The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
Open accessAbstract
Deficiencies in methods reporting in animal experimentation lead to difficulties in reproducing experiments; the authors propose a set of reporting standards to improve scientific communication and study design. Animal studies have contributed immensely to our understanding of diseases and assist the development of new therapies, but inadequate experimental reporting can sometimes render such studies difficult to reproduce and to translate into the clinic. This year, a US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop addressed this issue, and its conclusions are discussed in a Perspective piece in this issue of Nature. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum, studies should report on randomization, blinding, sample-size estimation and how the data were handled. The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In a hypothesis-testing study powered to detect an effect on the primary outcome measure, data on secondary outcomes are used to evaluate additional effects of the intervention, but subsequent statistical analysis of secondary outcome measures may be underpowered, making results and interpretation less reliable [88,93].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, greater use of measures to control risk of bias in animal experiments, such as randomization and blinding (Landis et al., 2012), was correlated with greater effect size decreases in replications.”
From Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical science (2025) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Other factors have been identified that could improve replicability, such as blinding, randomization, and sample size planning (Landis et al., 2012; Macleod and Mohan, 2019).”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The low replication success rates and small effect sizes we found reinforce prior calls for improving the rigor and transparency of preclinical research to improve the allocation of limited resources and to protect human participants from being enrolled in trials that are based on weak evidence”
From Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021) · cites this paper as Landis et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“By providing a comprehensive set of recommendations that are specifically tailored to the description of in vivo research, they help authors reporting animal experiments adhere to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) standards [43] and the minimum standards framework and checklist (Materials, Design, Analysis and Reporting [MDAR] [47]).”
From The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“The standards have been adopted by the National Institutes of Health (8,70).”
From Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data (2016) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 · Cited by 7,300
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.72351 · Cited by 6,277
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Guidelines for pre-clinical animal and cellular models of MuSK-myasthenia gravis
Phillips, W. D., Christadoss, P., Losen, M. H., Punga, A. R., Shigemoto, K., Verschuuren, J. J. G. M., & Vincent, A. C. (2014) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.12.013 · Cited by 30
Griffin, G., Clark, J. A. M., Zurlo, J., & Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. J. (2014) · Scientific and Technical Review (World Organisation for Animal Health) · doi:10.20506/rst.33.1.2283 · Cited by 31
Cramond, F., Irvine, C., Liao, J., Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., Currie, G. L., & Macleod, M. R. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1964-8 · Cited by 30
Self-citationThe WHAP Investigators, Szoeke, C. E. I., Coulson, M., Campbell, S., & Dennerstein, L. (2016) · Women s Midlife Health · doi:10.1186/s40695-016-0018-y · Cited by 29
Ethical challenges for a new generation of early-phase pediatric gene therapy trials
Iyer, A. A., Saade, D. N., Bharucha-Goebel, D. X., Foley, A. R., Averion, G. V., Paredes, E., Gray, S. J., Bönnemann, C. G., Grady, C., Hendriks, S., et al. (2021) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01245-3 · Cited by 29
Karp, N. A., Pearl, E. J., Stringer, E. J., Barkus, C., Ulrichsen, J. C., & du Sert, N. P. (2022) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001873 · Cited by 32
Howard, M. O., & Garland, E. L. (2015) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/681099 · Cited by 30
Knopp, K. L., Stenfors, C., Baastrup, C., Bannon, A. W., Calvo, M., Caspani, O., Currie, G. L., Finnerup, N. B., Huang, W., Kennedy, J. D., et al. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.01.006 · Cited by 29
Self-citationKasanmoentalib, E. S., Serón, M. V., Morgan, B. P., Brouwer, M. C., & van de Beek, D. (2015) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-015-0372-y · Cited by 29
Gong, B., Murray, K. D., & Trimmer, J. S. (2015) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2015.11.007 · Cited by 29
Huie, J. R., Stück, E. D., Lee, K. H., Irvine, K., Beattie, M. S., Bresnahan, J. C., Grau, J. W., & Ferguson, A. R. (2015) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0091-15.2015 · Cited by 29
Critical Evaluation of Animal Models of Gastrointestinal Disorders
Johnson, A. C., & Meerveld, B. G. (2017) · Handbook of experimental pharmacology · doi:10.1007/164_2016_120 · Cited by 29
Kim, E. J., Jang, M., Lee, M. J., Choi, J. H., Lee, S. J., Kim, S. K., Jang, D. S., & Cho, I. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00673 · Cited by 29
Risk of bias reporting in the recent animal focal cerebral ischaemia literature
Bahor, Z., Liao, J., Macleod, M. R., Bannach‐Brown, A., McCann, S., Wever, K. E., Thomas, J., Ottavi, T., Howells, D. W., Rice, A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20160722 · Cited by 31
Self-citationKing, K. M., Pullmann, M. D., Lyon, A. R., Dorsey, S., & Lewis, C. C. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000417 · Cited by 36
Bardoxolone Methyl in Type 2 Diabetes and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
Chertow, G. M., & de Zeeuw, D. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc1400872 · Cited by 29
Wyndham, J. M., Weisenberg, N., McCarty, C. A., Goldman, G. T., Brown, M., & Borenstein, J. (2022) · doi:10.1126/aaas.ade8203 · Cited by 29
Hosbas Coskun, S., Wise, S. A., & Kuszak, A. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.786261 · Cited by 28
Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges
Mullane, K., & Williams, M. (2017) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2017.04.008 · Cited by 28
Ha, Y., Jo, H.-S., Kwon, T. W., Jeon, S. H., Moon, S., Jung, J. H., Kim, M. S., Nah, S.-Y., Lee, J. K., & Cho, I. (2025) · Journal of Ginseng Research · doi:10.1016/j.jgr.2025.02.002 · Cited by 28
Kenakin, T., Bylund, D. B., Toews, M. L., Mullane, K., Winquist, R. J., & Williams, M. J. (2013) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2013.10.024 · Cited by 28
Jang, M., Lee, M. J., Choi, J. H., Kim, E., Nah, S.-Y., Kim, H., Lee, S., Lee, S., Kim, Y. O., & Cho, I. (2015) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.007 · Cited by 28
Kinouchi, T., Kitazato, K. T., Shimada, K., Yagi, K., Tada, Y., Matsushita, N., Kurashiki, Y., Satomi, J., Sata, M., & Nagahiro, S. (2017) · Translational Stroke Research · doi:10.1007/s12975-017-0577-8 · Cited by 28
Preclinical Stroke Research and Translational Failure: A Bird’s Eye View on Preventable Variables
Singh, D., Wasan, H., & Reeta, K. H. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s10571-021-01083-6 · Cited by 28
Hylander, B. L., Repasky, E. A., & Sexton, S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12030371 · Cited by 28
The methodological quality of animal research in critical care: the public face of science
Bara, M., & Joffe, A. R. (2014) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/s13613-014-0026-8 · Cited by 29
Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0193-230620150000018008 · Cited by 29
Li, W., Ward, R., Valenzuela, J. P., Dong, G., Fagan, S. C., & Ergul, A. (2017) · Translational Stroke Research · doi:10.1007/s12975-017-0525-7 · Cited by 28
Yang, W., & Paschen, W. (2017) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x17723783 · Cited by 28
Bao, X., Zheng, Q., Tong, Q., Zhu, P.-C., Zhuang, Z., Zheng, G., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01445 · Cited by 28
Framework for advancing rigorous research
Koroshetz, W. J., Behrman, S., Brame, C. J., Branchaw, J. L., Brown, E. N., Clark, E. A., Dockterman, D., Elm, J. J., Gay, P. L., Green, K. M., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.55915 · Cited by 28
Self-citationCellular and molecular mechanisms of injury and spontaneous recovery
McGinn, M. J., & Povlishock, J. T. (2015) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52892-6.00005-2 · Cited by 31
Intersection of Systematic Review Methodology with the NIH Reproducibility Initiative
Thayer, K. A., Wolfe, M. S., Rooney, A. A., Boyles, A. L., Bucher, J. R., & Birnbaum, L. S. (2014) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1408671 · Cited by 29
Enhancing the Efficacy of Radiation Therapy: Premises, Promises, and Practicality
Coleman, C. N., Lawrence, T. S., & Kirsch, D. G. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.57.3865 · Cited by 28
A New Account of Replication in the Experimental Life Sciences
Guttinger, S. (2019) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/703555 · Cited by 27
Parabrachial Nucleus Activity in Nociception and Pain in Awake Mice
Smith, J. A., Ji, Y., Lorsung, R. M., Breault, M. S., Koenig, J. A., Cramer, N., Masri, R. M., & Keller, A. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0587-23.2023 · Cited by 27
Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Ineichen, B. V., Held, U., Salanti, G., Macleod, M. R., & Wever, K. E. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00347-x · Cited by 28
Self-citationSingh, S. T., Pan, C., Wood, R. W., Yeh, C., Yeh, S., Sha, K., Krolewski, J. J., & Nastiuk, K. L. (2015) · BMC Urology · doi:10.1186/s12894-015-0091-9 · Cited by 27
Choi, J. H., Lee, M. J., Jang, M., Kim, E., Shim, I., Kim, H., Lee, S., Lee, S., Kim, Y. O., & Cho, I. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138592 · Cited by 27
In Pursuit of Greater Reproducibility and Credibility of Early Clinical Biomarker Research
McShane, L. (2017) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12449 · Cited by 28
The Research Reproducibility Crisis and Economics of Science
Maniadis, Z., & Tufano, F. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12526 · Cited by 28
Storey, J., Gobbetti, T., Olzinski, A. R., & Berridge, B. R. (2021) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar/ilac004 · Cited by 27
Issues for new antiepilepsy drug development
Simonato, M., French, J. A., Galanopoulou, A. S., & O'Brien, T. J. (2013) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32835efe29 · Cited by 27
O'Brien, T. J., Ben-Menachem, E., Bertram, E., Collins, S., Kokaia, M., Lerche, H., Klitgaard, H., Staley, K., Vaudano, E. A., Walker, M., et al. (2013) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12300 · Cited by 26
Wali, B., Ishrat, T., Stein, D. G., & Sayeed, I. (2016) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.02.024 · Cited by 27
Panchision, D. M. (2016) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.2295 · Cited by 27
Yarborough, M. A., Bredenoord, A. L., D’Abramo, F., Joyce, N. C., Kimmelman, J., Ogbogu, U., Sena, E. S., Strech, D., & Dirnagl, U. (2018) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006343 · Cited by 28
Synergizing Mouse and Human Studies to Understand the Heterogeneity of Obesity
Gordon‐Larsen, P., French, J. E., Moustaïd‐Moussa, N., Voruganti, V. S., Mayer‐Davis, E. J., Bizon, C., Cheng, Z., Stewart, D. A., Easterbrook, J. W., & Shaikh, S. R. (2021) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmab040 · Cited by 29
Hunniford, V. T., Grudniewicz, A., Fergusson, D. A., Montroy, J., Grigor, E., Lansdell, C., Lalu, M. M., & On behalf of The Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76300 · Cited by 26
Critically Evaluating Animal Research
Knight, A. (2019) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004391192_015 · Cited by 27
Ji, Y., Rizk, A. M., Voulalas, P. J., Aljohani, H., Akerman, S., Dussor, G. O., Keller, A., & Masri, R. M. (2019) · Neurobiology of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ynpai.2019.100031 · Cited by 26
Predicting Response to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Using High-Throughput Genomics
Geeleher, P., Loboda, A. P., Lenkala, D., Wang, F., LaCroix, B. L., Karovic, S., Wang, J., Nebozhyn, M., Chisamore, M. J., Hardwick, J. S., et al. (2015) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djv247 · Cited by 26
Aslam, R., Gibbons, D., & Ghezzi, P. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00090 · Cited by 26
Variation across Species and Levels: Implications for Model Species Research
Striedter, G. F. (2019) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000499664 · Cited by 28
Getting personal with the “reproducibility crisis”: interviews in the animal research community
Fitzpatrick, B. G., Koustova, E., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Lab Animal · doi:10.1038/s41684-018-0088-6 · Cited by 26
Menke, J., Eckmann, P., Ozyurt, I. B., Roelandse, M., Anderson, N., Grethe, J., Gamst, A., & Bandrowski, A. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/37324 · Cited by 25
Vickrey, B. G., Brott, T. G., & Koroshetz, W. J. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.113.001196 · Cited by 25
Self-citationImproving the Drug Development Process
Djulbegović, B., Hozo, I., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.283742 · Cited by 25
Targeted pharmacological treatment of autism spectrum disorders: fragile X and Rett syndromes
Wang, H., Pati, S. B. B., Pozzo‐Miller, L. D., & Doering, L. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00055 · Cited by 28
Girolamo, N. D., & Reynders, R. M. (2016) · Draw Science · doi:10.7717/peerj.1649 · Cited by 26
Bespalov, A., & Steckler, T. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.10.018 · Cited by 27
Bonafiglia, J. T., Islam, H., Preobrazenski, N., & Gurd, B. J. (2021) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2021.03.005 · Cited by 30
Kousholt, B. S., Præstegaard, K. F., Stone, J., Thomsen, A. F., Johansen, T. T., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. J., & Wegener, G. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275962 · Cited by 26
From methods to monographs: fostering a culture of research quality
Crawford, D. C., Hoye, M. L., & Silberberg, S. D. (2023) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0247-23.2023 · Cited by 25
Self-citationBeronius, A., Hanberg, A., Zilliacus, J., & Rudén, C. (2014) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2014.08.005 · Cited by 25
ABC transporter-driven pharmacoresistance in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Jablonski, M., Miller, D. S., Pasinelli, P., & Trotti, D. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.060 · Cited by 25
Testing Agents for Prevention or Reversal of Type 1 Diabetes in Rodents
Grant, C. W., Moran-Paul, C., Duclos, S., Guberski, D. L., Arreaza-Rubín, G., & Spain, L. M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072989 · Cited by 25
Snyder, H. M., Shineman, D. W., Friedman, L. G., Hendrix, J. A., Khachaturian, A. S., Guillou, I. L., Pickett, J., Refolo, L. M., Sancho, R. M., & Ridley, S. H. (2016) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.001 · Cited by 25
Data Standardization and Quality Management
Lapchak, P. A., & Zhang, J. H. (2017) · Translational Stroke Research · doi:10.1007/s12975-017-0531-9 · Cited by 25
Gonzalez‐Rothi, E. J., Streeter, K., Hanna, M. H., Stamas, A. C., Reier, P. J., Baekey, D. M., & Fuller, D. D. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00913.2016 · Cited by 25
Jang, M., Lee, S. E., & Cho, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00157 · Cited by 25
Embracing Transparency Through Data Sharing
Boué, S., Byrne, M., Hayes, A. W., Hoeng, J., & Peitsch, M. C. (2018) · International Journal of Toxicology · doi:10.1177/1091581818803880 · Cited by 26
Bolan, F., Louca, I., Heal, C., & Cunningham, C. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00924 · Cited by 25
Zhu, P.-C., Tong, Q., Zhuang, Z., Wang, Z.-H., Deng, L.-H., Zheng, G., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.01292 · Cited by 25
Niedecker, R. W., Kloc, M. L., Holmes, G. L., & Barry, J. M. (2021) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.16927 · Cited by 25
Preclinical data reproducibility for R&D—the challenge for neuroscience
Steckler, T. (2015) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-014-3836-3 · Cited by 25
Bayon, Y., Bohner, M., Eglin, D., Procter, P., Richards, R. G., Weber, J., & Zeugolis, D. I. (2016) · Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10856-016-5759-5 · Cited by 25
Macleod, M. R., & The NPQIP Collaborative group (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/187245 · Cited by 27
Self-citationSantana, F. D. F. V., Lozi, A. A., Gonçalves, R. V., Silva, J. D., & da Matta, S. L. P. (2023) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2023.116710 · Cited by 24
Dexmedetomidine ameliorates nocifensive behavior in humanized sickle cell mice
Calhoun, G., Wang, L., Almeida, L. E. F., Kenyon, N. J., Afsar, N. M., Nouraie, M. S., Finkel, J. C., & Quezado, Z. (2015) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.02.027 · Cited by 24
dos Reis, S. R. R., Pinto, S. R., de Menezes, F. D., Martínez‐Máñez, R., Ricci‐Júnior, E., Alencar, L. M. R., Helal‐Neto, E., de Barros, A. O. D. S., Lisboa, P. C., & Santos‐Oliveira, R. (2020) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-019-2754-9 · Cited by 24
An Unappreciated Challenge to Oncology Drug Discovery: Pitfalls in Preclinical Research
Begley, C. G. (2013) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.466 · Cited by 24
Improving the predictive value of interventional animal models data
Zeiss, C. J. (2014) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.015 · Cited by 25
Lapchak, P. A., & Boitano, P. D. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.04.039 · Cited by 24
Not All Mice Are the Same: Standardization of Animal Research Data Presentation
Omary, M. B., Cohen, D. E., El-Omar, E. M., Jalan, R., Low, M. J., Nathanson, M. H., Peek, R. M., & Turner, J. R. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.034 · Cited by 24
Yosten, G. L. C., Adams, J. C., Bennett, C. N., Bunnett, N. W., Scheman, R., Sigmund, C. D., Yates, B. J., Zucker, I. H., & Samson, W. K. (2018) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00274.2018 · Cited by 24
Lightweight Distributed Provenance Model for Complex Real–world Environments
Wittner, R., Mascia, C., Gallo, M., Frexia, F., Müller, H., Plass, M., Geiger, J., & Holub, P. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01537-6 · Cited by 24
Sarapultsev, A., Komelkova, M. V., Lookin, O. N., Khatsko, S. L., Gusev, E., Трофимов, А. Н., Tokay, T., & Hu, D. (2024) · Pathophysiology · doi:10.3390/pathophysiology31040051 · Cited by 23
Sizemore, G., Lucke-Wold, B. P., Rosen, C. L., Simpkins, J. W., Bhatia, S., & Sun, D. (2018) · OBM Neurobiology · doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.1802009 · Cited by 23
Sex as a Biological Variable in Preclinical Modeling of Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury
McCabe, J. T., & Tucker, L. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.541050 · Cited by 24
Zhu, P.-C., Shen, J., Qian, R.-Y., Xu, J., Liu, C., Hu, W., Zhang, Y., & Lv, L.-C. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1165212 · Cited by 23
Flaws in animal studies exploring statins and impact on meta‐analysis
Moja, L., Pecoraro, V. L., Ciccolallo, L., Dall’Olmo, L., Virgili, G., & Garattini, S. K. (2014) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.12264 · Cited by 23
Evidence-based translational medicine.
Howells, D., & Macleod, M. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.113.000469 · Cited by 26
Self-citationReproducibility Issues: Avoiding Pitfalls in Animal Inflammation Models
Laman, J. D., Kooistra, S. M., & Clausen, B. E. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6786-5_1 · Cited by 23
Preclinical progenitor cell therapy in traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis
Jackson, M. L., Srivastava, A. K., & Cox, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.078 · Cited by 23
Choi, J. H., Jang, M., Lee, J.-I., Chung, W., & Cho, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01444 · Cited by 23
Rufiange, M., Rousseau‐Blass, F., & Pang, D. (2019) · Veterinary Record Open · doi:10.1136/vetreco-2018-000322 · Cited by 24
Ramirez, F. D., Jung, R. G., Motazedian, P., Perry‐Nguyen, D., Santo, P. D., MacDonald, Z., Clancy, A. A., Labinaz, A., Promislow, S., Simard, T., et al. (2019) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.119.026564 · Cited by 23
Relevance relations for the concept of reproducibility
Harald Atmanspacher, A., Lambert, L. B., Folkers, G., & Schubiger, P. A. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.1030 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Landis, S. C., Amara, S. G., Asadullah, K., Austin, C. P., Blumenstein, R., Bradley, E. W., Crystal, R. G., Darnell, R. B., Ferrante, R. J., Fillit, H., Finkelstein, R., Fisher, M., Gendelman, H. E., Golub, R. M., Goudreau, J. L., Gross, R. A., Gubitz, A. K., Hesterlee, S. E., Howells, D. W., Huguenard, J., Kelner, K., Koroshetz, W., Krainc, D., Lazic, S. E., Levine, M. S., Macleod, M. R., McCall, J. M., Moxley III, R. T., Narasimhan, K., Noble, L. J., Perrin, S., Porter, J. D., Steward, O., Unger, E., Utz, U., & Silberberg, S. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Bayer (Germany) (DE)
- CHDI Foundation (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- American Medical Association (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
- American Association For The Advancement of Science (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Western General Hospital (GB)
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Therapy Development Institute (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silberberg, Shai D.
- ORCID
- Amara, Susan G.
- Crystal, Ronald G.
- Darnell, Robert B.
- Fillit, Howard
- Fisher, Marc
- Gendelman, Howard E.
- Goudreau, John L.
- Gross, Robert A.
- Howells, David W.
- Huguenard, John
- Koroshetz, Walter
- Krainc, Dimitri
- Lazic, Stanley E.
- Macleod, Malcolm R.
- Porter, John D.
- Steward, Oswald
- Unger, Ellis
- Utz, Ursula
- Silberberg, Shai D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 490
- Issue
- 7419
- Pages
- 187-191
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3511845
- OpenAlex
- W2137516955
- Cited by
- 1,196
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 149.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 NS999999, 5t32ns007280-35)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P30MH062261, T32MH020016)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS-007280, P01NS012151, R01NS041574, R01NS034774, R01NS006477)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024160)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- animal experimentation, preclinical research, reporting guidelines, reproducibility, sample size determination, randomization, blinding, data handling, translational research, grant applications, peer review
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Publishing, Random Allocation, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
