Cited by 195Williams Syndrome ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersPluripotent Stem Cells Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome

Open access

Abstract

Williams syndrome is a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by an uncommon hypersociability and a mosaic of retained and compromised linguistic and cognitive abilities. Nearly all clinically diagnosed individuals with Williams syndrome lack precisely the same set of genes, with breakpoints in chromosome band 7q11.23 (refs 1-5). The contribution of specific genes to the neuroanatomical and functional alterations, leading to behavioural pathologies in humans, remains largely unexplored. Here we investigate neural progenitor cells and cortical neurons derived from Williams syndrome and typically developing induced pluripotent stem cells. Neural progenitor cells in Williams syndrome have an increased doubling time and apoptosis compared with typically developing neural progenitor cells. Using an individual with atypical Williams syndrome, we narrowed this cellular phenotype to a single gene candidate, frizzled 9 (FZD9). At the neuronal stage, layer V/VI cortical neurons derived from Williams syndrome were characterized by longer total dendrites, increased numbers of spines and synapses, aberrant calcium oscillation and altered network connectivity. Morphometric alterations observed in neurons from Williams syndrome were validated after Golgi staining of post-mortem layer V/VI cortical neurons. This model of human induced pluripotent stem cells fills the current knowledge gap in the cellular biology of Williams syndrome and could lead to further insights into the molecular mechanism underlying the disorder and the human social brain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature19067

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Chailangkarn, T., Trujillo, C. A., Freitas, B. C., Hrvoj-Mihic, B., Herai, R. H., Yu, D. X., Brown, T. T., Marchetto, M. C., Bardy, C., McHenry, L., Stefanacci, L., Järvinen, A., Searcy, Y. M., DeWitt, M., Wong, W., Lai, P., Ard, M. C., Hanson, K. L., Romero, S., Jacobs, B., Dale, A. M., Dai, L., Korenberg, J. R., Gage, F. H., Bellugi, U., Halgren, E., Semendeferi, K., & Muotri, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • Colorado College (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
  • Semendeferi, Katerina
  • Muotri, Alysson R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-08
Volume
536
Issue
7616
Pages
338-343
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2510152931
Cited by
195
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 4
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od006495-01)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P01 NICHD033113)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020002, R01MH095741, R01MH103134, U19MH107367, U19MH106434, R01MH094753, R56MH109587, R01MH100175)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (T32DC007361)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
Williams syndrome, induced pluripotent stem cells, neural progenitor cells, cortical neurons, FZD9, haploinsufficiency, apoptosis, dendritic morphology, synapses, calcium oscillations, neuronal network connectivity, social brain, neurodevelopmental disorders, 7q11.23 deletion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Calcium, Cell Differentiation, Cerebral Cortex, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7, Dendrites, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Phenotype, Synapses, Reproducibility of Results, Apoptosis, Williams Syndrome, Cell Shape, Frizzled Receptors, Young Adult, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Haploinsufficiency, Neural Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review