Cited by 275Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Getting to the cores of autism

Open access
Iakoucheva, Lilia M., Muotri, Alysson R., Sebat, Jonathan·2019·Cell

Abstract

The genetic architecture of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is itself a diverse allelic spectrum that consists of rare de novo or inherited variants in hundreds of genes and common polygenic risk at thousands of loci. ASD susceptibility genes are interconnected at the level of transcriptional and protein networks, and many function as genetic regulators of neurodevelopment or synaptic proteins that regulate neural activity. So that the core underlying neuropathologies can be further elucidated, we emphasize the importance of first defining subtypes of ASDs based on the phenotypic signatures of genes in model systems and humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.037

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 141 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Recessive variants account for up to 30% of cases in consanguineous families.

    “Recessive variants account for a small fraction of idiopathic ASD (Gamsiz et al., 2013) and developmental delay, but they account for a larger proportion (up to 30%) of cases in consanguineous families (Martin et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Some ASD genetic risk comes from rare variants inherited from a mother or father.

    “A portion of genetic risk for ASD consists of rare variants that are inherited from a mother or father (Fig. 1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Large CNVs such as duplications of 15q11-13 and 16p11.2 and deletions of 15q11.2 can be transmitted from a parent with mild or no symptoms.

    “These include duplications of 15q11–13 and 16p11.2 and deletions of 15q11.2 (Doornbos et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Doornbos et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    A portion of ASD genetic architecture consists of rare coding variants with incomplete penetrance inherited from parents who do not meet ASD criteria.

    “Thus, a portion of the genetic architecture consists of rare coding variants with incomplete penetrance that are inherited from parents who do not meet criteria for ASD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    A combined sample of 35,584 individuals, including 11,986 with ASD, raised the number of high-confidence ASD genes to 102.

    “A recent study in a combined sample of 35,584 samples (11,986 with ASD), has brought the number of high confidence genes to 102 (Satterstrom et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Satterstrom et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    ASD genetic architecture includes rare de novo or inherited variants across hundreds of genes and common polygenic risk at thousands of loci.

    “The genetic architecture of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is itself a diverse allelic spectrum that consists of rare de novo or inherited variants in hundreds of genes and common polygenic risk at thousands of loci.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    De novo structural variants and protein-altering point mutations contribute to ASD risk.

    “Early studies established that de novo structural variants (SVs) (Brandler et al., 2016; Sebat et al., 2007) and protein-altering point mutations (Iossifov et al., 2012; Neale et al., 2012; O’Roak et al., 2012; Sanders et al., 2012) contribute to risk for ASD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brandler et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Sebat et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Iossifov et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TADA tests gene-disease association using frequencies of de novo and transmitted mutations observed in parent-offspring trios.

    “More recently, statistical methods such as the transmission and de novo association (TADA) (He et al., 2013) have been developed for testing the disease association of genes based on the frequency of de novo and transmitted mutations observed in parent-offspring trios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    De novo mutations in genes account for about 30% of ASD cases, including 25% of boys and 45% of girls.

    “It is estimated that de novo mutations of genes contribute in approximately 30% of cases, including 25% of boys and 45% of girls (Iossifov et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iossifov et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    About 70% of de novo mutations are paternal, and the total new mutation rate in offspring increases by 1-2 mutations per year with paternal age.

    “Thus, a majority (70%) of de novo mutations originate from the father and total rate of new mutations in offspring increase by 1–2 mutations per year with his age (Kong et al., 2012; Michaelson et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kong et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Michaelson et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    CNVs and common polygenic risk may differ in how they directly affect gene function.

    “Other types of ASD risk alleles, such as CNV or common polygenic risk, may differ in how they directly impact gene function (Fig 2B-C).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In individuals carrying de novo CNVs or gene mutations, psychiatric diagnoses vary and only a subset meet criteria for ASD.

    “In subjects who carry de novo CNVs or gene mutations, psychiatric diagnoses are variable and typically only a subset meet criteria for ASD (De Rubeis and Buxbaum, 2015; Malhotra and Sebat, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites De Rubeis and Buxbaum, 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Malhotra and Sebat, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bckdk knockout mice show abnormal brain amino acid profiles and neurobehavioral deficits that respond to dietary supplementation.

    “Bckdk knockout mice show abnormal brain amino acid profiles and neurobehavioral deficits that respond to dietary supplementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Novarino et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Features of Angelman, Phelan McDermid, and Smith-Magenis syndromes can be recapitulated by point mutations in UBE3A, SHANK3, and RAI1 respectively.

    “For example, clinical features of Angelman, Phelan McDermid and Smith-Magenis Syndromes, which are caused by large deletions of multiple genes, can be recapitulated by point mutations in UBE3A (Fang et al., 1999) and SHANK3 (Bonaglia et al., 2006) and RAI1 (Slager et al., 2003) respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fang et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bonaglia et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Slager et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pizzo et al. tested RNA knockdown of 16p11.2 genes on more than 20 Drosophila phenotypes and found that combinations of multiple genes elicit varied effects on eye, wing, and nervous system development.

    “Pizzo et al, tested the effect of RNA-knockdown of genes on >20 classic phenotypes used to assess development in Drosophila (Pizzo et al., 2018). This study found that combinations of multiple 16p11.2 genes could elicit a variety of effects on development of the eye, wing and nervous system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pizzo et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sanders et al. found no increased rate of de novo protein-truncating mutations inside large CNVs containing more than seven genes, but a significantly increased rate within smaller CNVs.

    “Sanders et al. examined rates of gene mutations within large CNVs and without and found no evidence for an increased rate of de novo protein truncation mutations inside of large CNVs that contained >7 genes, whereas there was a significantly increased rate of de novo mutation within smaller CNVs (Sanders et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanders et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The authors' group found that the 16p11.2 CNV has significant effects on craniofacial structure conserved in human, mouse, and zebrafish, and several genes affect skull growth.

    “Our group has studied the effects of 16p11.2 genes on craniofacial development, and found that the CNV has significant effects on craniofacial structure that are conserved in human, mouse, zebrafish, and several genes have significant effects on growth of the skull (Qiu et al.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Qiu et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A PRS for a specific trait represents genetic effects from thousands of points within a regulatory network and propagates broadly through trans effects.

    “Thus a PRS that is defined for a specific trait represents genetic effects that originate from thousands of different points within a genetic regulatory network (Fig 2C) and propagate even more broadly through effects mediated in trans through downstream regulatory genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    RNA targets of FMRP and CELF4 are significantly enriched for ASD genes, and ASD candidate genes are enriched among their common targets.

    “RNA targets of both FMRP (Darnell et al., 2011) and CELF4 (Wagnon et al., 2012) were reported to be significantly enriched for ASD genes, and ASD candidate genes were further enriched among the common targets of FMRP and CELF4 (Wagnon et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Darnell et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wagnon et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of 18,381 ASD cases and 27,969 controls found credible evidence for five risk loci and seven additional loci shared with other psychiatric disorders.

    “A recent meta-analysis of 18,381 ASD cases and 27,969 controls has found credible evidence for five risk loci and seven additional loci shared with other psychiatric disorders (Grove et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grove et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TBR1 encodes a transcription factor that binds DNA and regulates gene expression in the developing brain.

    “For example, TBR1 encodes a transcription factor that binds DNA and regulates gene expression in the developing brain (Bedogni et al., 2010; Hevner et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bedogni et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hevner et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    FMRP is a seminal example of an ASD-associated RNA-binding protein; other ASD-associated RBPs include CELF4, ELAVL3, and GIGYF1.

    “A seminal example is the Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) (Darnell et al., 2011), and other RBPs that are associated with ASD include CELF4 (Wagnon et al., 2012), ELAVL3 (Ince-Dunn et al., 2012) and GIGYF1 (Peter et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Darnell et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wagnon et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ince-Dunn et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Polygenic risk consists of thousands of small effects that segregate independently in the population.

    “Polygenic risk consist of thousands of small effects that segregate independently in the population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Identifying specific neuropathologies common among multiple ASD etiologies could help define biological processes that influence social behavior.

    “To the extent that there exist specific neuropathologies that are common among multiple ASD etiologies, identifying these could help to define the biological processes that influence social behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A major prediction of the omnigenic model is that most trait heritability is explained by peripheral genetic effects propagated through regulatory networks, while core gene variation explains a small fraction.

    “One of the major predictions of the omnigenic model is that a majority of trait heritability is explained by peripheral genetic effects that are propagated through genetic regulatory networks and genetic variation in core genes explains a small fraction of the overall heritability (Liu et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Psychopathology emerges from dysfunction at the level of neural circuitry, and circuit function arises through development in which multiple biological processes are tightly regulated.

    “Psychopathology emerges from dysfunction at the level of neural circuitry, and circuit function arises through a process of development in which multiple biological processes are tightly regulated (Polleux et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Polleux et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The rigid dichotomy of core and peripheral genes is the most difficult aspect of the omnigenic model to reconcile.

    “With respect to psychiatric traits, the most difficult aspect of the model to reconcile in our view is the rigid dichotomy of core and peripheral genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Knockdown of CHD8 in adult mice leads to disruption of Wnt signaling and abnormal neural progenitor cell proliferation.

    “For example, knockdown of CHD8 in adult mice leads to a disruption of Wnt signaling and abnormal NPC proliferation (Durak et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Durak et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Relationships between genes and biological processes could be defined based on phenotype profiles across a common battery of assays.

    “Thus relationships between genes and biological processes could be defined based on the phenotype profiles of multiple genes across a common battery of assays.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    iPSCs are attractive human models for complex diseases, and iPSC lines have been generated for a variety of monogenic ASD diseases.

    “Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are attractive human models for understanding complex diseases, and iPSC lines have been generated for a variety monogenic ASD diseases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    mTOR inhibitors have been proposed as treatments for syndromes with mTOR signaling disruption, and Everolimus has been approved for seizures in tuberous sclerosis.

    “Subsequently, inhibitors of mTOR have been proposed as treatments for such syndromes and one drug Everolimus has been approved for treatment of seizures in tuberous sclerosis (French et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites French et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The omnigenic model posits that complex traits are so polygenic that core genes with direct effects are difficult to distinguish from many peripheral genes acting indirectly.

    “This model posits that the genetic basis of complex traits is polygenic to such an extent that it becomes difficult to distinguish “core” genes that have direct effects on a trait from the many “peripheral” genes that act indirectly and which may have a distant relationship to the core biological processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyle et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Common polygenic heritability of ASD is significantly enriched in genes and enhancer marks expressed in the developing brain, with similar enrichment of cortical cell types.

    “Recently, common polygenic heritability of ASD was found to be significantly enriched in genes and enhancer marks that are expressed in the developing brain, with a similar enrichment of cortical cell types (Grove et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grove et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pathways implicated in ASD include synaptic transmission, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, ion transport, and cell adhesion.

    “Pathways implicated from above studies included synaptic transmission, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, ion transport, and cell adhesion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genes within ASD CNVs are highly connected with each other and with other ASD genes.

    “Studies of large CNVs in ASD have shown that genes within ASD CNVs are highly connected with each other (Corominas et al., 2014) and with other ASD genes (Pinto et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Corominas et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pinto et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dysregulation of MAPK signaling has been reported in transgenic mice carrying the 16p11.2 microdeletion and in other mouse models of social impairment.

    “The dysregulation of MAPK signaling has also been reported in transgenic mice carrying the ASD-associated microdeletion of 16p11.2 (Blizinsky et al., 2016; Pucilowska et al., 2015) and in other mouse models of social impairment (Faridar et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Blizinsky et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pucilowska et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Faridar et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ASD genes as a group are preferentially expressed in late mid-fetal prefrontal cortex, concentrated in layer 5/6 cortical projection neurons.

    “Analysis of spatiotemporal expression of genes has revealed that ASD genes as a group are preferentially expressed in late mid-fetal prefrontal cortex, with a concentration in layer 5/6 cortical projection neurons (Willsey et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Willsey et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MAPK and Rho GTPase signaling have been implicated by gene set enrichment analysis of ASD-associated CNVs.

    “MAPK (Pinto et al., 2010) and Rho GTPase (Lin et al., 2015) signaling has been implicated by gene set enrichment analysis of CNVs associated with ASD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pinto et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lin et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A master regulator of gene expression could be as near the center of the hypothetical ASD gene network as any neurotransmitter receptor or voltage-gated sodium channel.

    “Given that the regulation of neurodevelopment is central to ASD pathogenesis, we might argue that a master regulator of gene expression could be as near to the center of the hypothetical ASD gene network as any neurotransmitter receptor or voltage-gated sodium channel.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If multiple clinical entities within ASD have distinct neurobiological bases, defining the genetic and clinical components of the autism spectrum is necessary for mechanistic understanding.

    “To the extent that there exist multiple clinical entitities within ASD that have a distinct neurobiological basis, defining the genetic and clinical components of the autism spectrum is necessary to achieving a mechanistic understanding of it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutations in RAS/MAPK signaling genes form Rasopathies, which are frequently associated with ASD features.

    “Mutations in a set of genes involved in RAS/MAPK signaling form a set of syndromes known as “Rasopathies”, which are frequently associated with features of ASD (Adviento et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adviento et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Multiple core genes and regulators tightly connected in a genetic regulatory network might have correlated phenotype profiles underlying predisposition to ASD.

    “In principle, multiple core genes and regulators that are tightly connected in a genetic regulatory network might also have correlated phenotype profiles that underlie their predisposition to ASD (Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Mutations of distantly related genes or reciprocal deletions/duplications of the same genes could have contrasting molecular and cellular phenotypes.

    “Conversely, mutations of distantly related genes or reciprocal deletions or duplications of the same genes could have contrasting molecular and cellular phenotypes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genotype-phenotype correlation has been proposed for clinical subtyping of common disease, and factor analysis of phenotype data has been proposed to define homogeneous clinical subtypes of ASD.

    “Genotype-phenotype correlation has been proposed for clinical subtyping of common disease (Luo et al., 2018), and factor analysis of phenotype data has been proposed as a means to define homogenous clinical subtypes of ASD (Georgiades et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Luo et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Georgiades et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Modules of core genes could be defined based on trait correlations similar to detection of modules based on gene co-expression.

    “Modules of core genes could be defined based on their trait correlations in a manner not unlike the detection of modules based on gene co-expression (Langfelder and Horvath).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Langfelder and Horvath

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mutations disrupting ARID1B result in activation of Wnt signaling and dysregulation of B-catenin transcription.

    “Mutations that disrupt ARID1B result in activation of Wnt signaling and dysregulation of B-catenin transcription (Vasileiou et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vasileiou et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent efforts have been initiated to systematize phenotyping of model systems and apply a standard battery of assays to gene mutations on a single isogenic background.

    “Recent efforts have been initiated to systematize the phenotyping of model systems and to apply a standard battery of assays to gene mutations on a single isogenic background (Deneault et al., 2018) and https://bit.ly/2Tc0lQ4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deneault et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Developmentally co-regulated modules of gene expression in fetal brain are enriched in ASD risk genes, with layer 2-4 and glutamatergic projection neurons showing strongest enrichment.

    “Another study has identified several developmentally co-regulated modules of gene expression in fetal brain that are enriched in ASD risk genes, with layer 2–4 and glutamatergic projection neurons showing strongest enrichment (Parikshak et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Parikshak et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Brain organoids are three-dimensional self-assembled multicellular structures that mimic the organization, transcriptional and epigenetic signature of a developing human brain.

    “An attractive approach to systematically record multiple phenotypes within a single system is to use brain organoids, three-dimensional self-assembled multi-cellular structures that mimic the organization, transcriptional and epigenetic signature of a developing human brain (Lancaster et al.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lancaster et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased dendrite length and synaptogenesis have been reported in neuron models of Williams syndrome and SHANK2, highlighting that different mutations of the same or different genes can have opposing effects on a cellular phenotype.

    “An increase in dendrite length and synaptogenesis has also been reported in neuron models of Williams syndrome (Chailangkarn et al., 2016) and SHANK2 (Zaslavsky et al., 2019), further highlight how different mutations of the same gene or different genes can have opposing effects on a cellular phenotype”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chailangkarn et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zaslavsky et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cellular models of reciprocal 16p11.2 deletions and duplications recapitulate mirror effects on cell proliferation and reveal mirror effects on synaptic density.

    “Cellular models of reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p11.2 recapitulate mirror effects on cell proliferation and reveal mirror effects on synaptic density (Deshpande et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deshpande et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    iPSC models of rare microcephaly syndromes show loss of neuronal progenitor cells and premature neural differentiation.

    “IPSC models of rare microcephaly syndromes have been shown to undergo loss of neuronal progenitor cells and premature neural differentiation (Lancaster et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lancaster et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neurons derived from this ASD cohort formed fewer excitatory synapses and matured into defective neuronal networks with less bursting.

    “Neurons derived from this cohort formed fewer excitatory synapses and matured into defective neuronal networks with less bursting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marchetto et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The authors attribute the progress of ASD research in the post-genomics era to transformative sequencing technologies and to large genomic datasets created by NIH and private funders.

    “We attribute this success to the arrival of game-changing sequencing technologies and the creation of large genomic datasets via National Institutes of Health and privately funded resources (Fischbach and Lord, 2010; RK et al., 2017; Spark Consortium, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fischbach and Lord, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites RK et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Spark Consortium, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Human cortical neurons from Rett Syndrome patients with MECP2 loss-of-function displayed reduced arborization and lower glutamatergic synaptic puncta, leading to neural network defects.

    “Human cortical neurons displayed reduced arborization and lower glutamatergic synaptic puncta, leading to defects on neural networks (Marchetto et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marchetto et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Different gene mutations can have different or opposite effects on cellular phenotypes, suggesting that ASD might result from different types of neuropathology.

    “Furthermore, results from recent studies highlight how different gene mutations can have different (sometimes opposite) effects on cellular phenotypes, which highlight how ASD might result from different types of neuropathology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among ASD genes affecting head size, CHD8 and PTEN mutations are associated with macrocephaly, while DYRK1A and CDKL5 mutations are associated with microcephaly.

    “Among the ASD genes that have effects on head size, mutations in CHD8 (Bernier et al.) and PTEN (Butler et al., 2005) are associated with macrocephaly and mutations of DYRK1A (Courcet et al., 2012) and CDKL5 (Archer et al., 2006) are associated with microcephaly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bernier et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Butler et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Courcet et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Long-term maturation of neural networks on brain organoids can lead to EEG-like oscillatory waves that could be directly compared to EEG signals from ASD individuals.

    “Long-term maturation of the neural networks on brain organoids can lead to EEG-like oscillatory waves that could be directly compared to EEG signals from ASD individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Macrocephaly is characteristic of some genetic subtypes of ASD, while microcephaly is associated with other genetic disorders within ASD.

    “As genetic findings have emerged, it has become evident that macrocephaly is a characteristic of some genetic subtypes of ASD while the opposite phenotype (microcephaly) is associated with other genetic disorders within ASD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Human iPSC-derived neural progenitor cells from ASD subjects with early developmental brain enlargement displayed rapid proliferation, consistent with altered cell-cycle regulation underlying neuroanatomical traits.

    “Human iPSC-derived Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from subjects with ASD and early developmental brain enlargement displayed rapid proliferation, consistent with altered cell-cycle regulation underlying neuroanatomical traits (Marchetto et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marchetto et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brain organoid models have recapitulated cell proliferation effects in microcephaly and have been used to study neural migration defects in Timothy syndrome.

    “Brain organoid models have been shown to recapitulate cell proliferation effects in microcephaly (Thomas et al., 2017) and have been used to study neural migration defects in Timothy syndrome, a rare ASD form caused by mutations in the Cav1.2 calcium channel gene (Birey et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Thomas et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Birey et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

56 of 56
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The growing list of ASD susceptibility genes does not by itself provide a mechanistic understanding of ASD.

    “However, this growing “parts list” does not translate immediately into a mechanistic understanding of ASD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A large number of genes that increase susceptibility to ASD are already known.

    “With hundreds of ASD susceptibility genes now identified”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No molecular pathways are currently known to be uniquely associated with ASD when disrupted.

    “although no molecular pathways are currently known to be uniquely associated with ASD when disrupted.49”

    From Insufficient Evidence for “Autism-Specific” Genes (2020) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • CNTNAP5 conflicts with the cited study's CNTN5

    Minor

    The text identifies CNTNAP5 as a gene in the cited neuronal-model study, but the cited reference names CNTN5 instead.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Satterstrom, 2018, Novel genes for autism implicate both excitatory and inhibitory cell lineages in risk, bioRxiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iakoucheva, L. M., Muotri, A. R., & Sebat, J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Sebat, Jonathan
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
178
Issue
6
Pages
1287-1298
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971462245
Cited by
260
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (345469, 606768, R01MH108528, R21MH104766, R01MH109885)
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH108528, R21MH104766, R01MH109885, R01MH113715, U01MH109501, R21MH113179)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, genetic architecture, de novo mutations, inherited mutations, polygenic risk, transcriptional regulatory networks, protein networks, brain development, synaptic proteins, ASD subtypes, phenotypic signatures, animal models
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Gene Regulatory Networks, Neurogenesis, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review