Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Strong genetic associations have been found for a number of psychiatric disorders. However, understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms remains challenging. RATIONALE: To address this challenge, the PsychENCODE Consortium has developed a comprehensive online resource and integrative models for the functional genomics of the human brain. RESULTS: The base of the pyramidal resource is the datasets generated by PsychENCODE, including bulk transcriptome, chromatin, genotype, and Hi-C datasets and single-cell transcriptomic data from ~32,000 cells for major brain regions. We have merged these with data from Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), ENCODE, Roadmap Epigenomics, and single-cell analyses. Via uniform processing, we created a harmonized resource, allowing us to survey functional genomics data on the brain over a sample size of 1866 individuals. From this uniformly processed dataset, we created derived data products. These include lists of brain-expressed genes, coexpression modules, and single-cell expression profiles for many brain cell types; ~79,000 brain-active enhancers with associated Hi-C loops and topologically associating domains; and ~2.5 million expression quantitative-trait loci (QTLs) comprising ~238,000 linkage-disequilibrium–independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms and of other types of QTLs associated with splice isoforms, cell fractions, and chromatin activity. By using these, we found that >88% of the cross-population variation in brain gene expression can be accounted for by cell fraction changes. Furthermore, a number of disorders and aging are associated with changes in cell-type proportions. The derived data also enable comparison between the brain and other tissues. In particular, by using spectral analyses, we found that the brain has distinct expression and epigenetic patterns, including a greater extent of noncoding transcription than other tissues. The top level of the resource consists of integrative networks for regulation and machine-learning models for disease prediction. The networks include a full gene regulatory network (GRN) for the brain, linking transcription factors, enhancers, and target genes from merging of the QTLs, generalized element-activity correlations, and Hi-C data. By using this network, we link disease genes to genome-wide association study (GWAS) variants for psychiatric disorders. For schizophrenia, we linked 321 genes to the 142 reported GWAS loci. We then embedded the regulatory network into a deep-learning model to predict psychiatric phenotypes from genotype and expression. Our model gives a ~6-fold improvement in prediction over additive polygenic risk scores. Moreover, it achieves a ~3-fold improvement over additive models, even when the gene expression data are imputed, highlighting the value of having just a small amount of transcriptome data for disease prediction. Lastly, it highlights key genes and pathways associated with disorder prediction, including immunological, synaptic, and metabolic pathways, recapitulating de novo results from more targeted analyses. CONCLUSION: Our resource and integrative analyses have uncovered genomic elements and networks in the brain, which in turn have provided insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders. Our deep-learning model improves disease risk prediction over traditional approaches and can be extended with additional data types (e.g., microRNA and neuroimaging). A comprehensive functional genomic resource for the adult human brain.: The resource forms a three-layer pyramid. The bottom layer includes sequencing datasets for traits, such as schizophrenia. The middle layer represents derived datasets, including functional genomic elements and QTLs. The top layer contains integrated models, which link genotypes to phenotypes. DSPN, Deep Structured Phenotype Network; PC1 and PC2, principal components 1 and 2; ref, reference; alt, alternate; H3K27ac, histone H3 acetylation at lysine 27.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The PsychENCODE Consortium assembled an adult brain functional genomics resource spanning 1,866 prefrontal cortex individuals, integrating transcriptomic, epigenomic, single-cell, Hi-C, and QTL data. Embedding the resulting regulatory network in an interpretable deep-learning model improved psychiatric trait prediction by about sixfold over polygenic risk scores and linked schizophrenia GWAS loci to candidate genes.
Key findings
- The resource contains 3,810 PsychENCODE datasets plus 1,662 external bulk datasets, with prefrontal cortex sampling from 1,866 individuals; single-cell RNA-seq covers 18,025 PsychENCODE cells and 14,012 external cells. It annotates 79,056 prefrontal cortex enhancers, 2,735 topologically associating domains, and about 90,000 enhancer-promoter interactions.
- Cell-type proportion variation explains more than 88% of cross-population bulk expression variation; estimated NEU+/− fractions matched reference samples with a median difference of 0.04. Cell fraction shifts were associated with sex, autism spectrum disorder (higher Ex5, lower oligodendrocytes), and age (increases in Ex3 and Ex4).
- QTL analyses identified about 2.5 million cis-eQTLs involving roughly 33,000 eGenes, including 1,341,182 eQTL SNPs from about 5.3 million tested and 238,194 independent SNPs after LD pruning. Additional findings include about 2,000 cQTLs plus 6,200 from CMC, 1,672 SNPs forming 4,199 fQTLs, 202,940 SNPs in residual eQTLs, and 2,477 multi-QTLs.
- The regulatory network linked 142 schizophrenia GWAS loci to 1,111 putative schizophrenia genes across 119 loci, with 321 high-confidence genes. The deep-learning model improved prediction by about sixfold (+22.9% versus +3.8% for genome alone) and achieved about a 3.1-fold improvement over logistic prediction for genotype-only inference; liability-scale variance explained was 32.8% for schizophrenia and 37.4% for bipolar disorder, but 11.3% for autism spectrum disorder.
Methods
- The study built a hierarchical resource by merging PsychENCODE adult brain data with ENCODE, CommonMind Consortium, GTEx, Roadmap, and single-cell datasets, processing RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, DNase-seq, ATAC-seq, and Hi-C through standardized pipelines.
- Analyses included bulk and single-cell transcriptome profiling, nonnegative matrix factorization, deconvolution of bulk expression into cell-type signatures and fractions, enhancer annotation using H3K27ac and H3K4me3, QTL mapping for expression, isoforms, chromatin, cell fractions, and residual expression, Hi-C-based regulatory linkage, transcription-factor target regression, GWAS variant-to-gene mapping, and a Deep Structured Phenotype Network.
- Key sample sizes include 1,866 prefrontal cortex individuals, 50 individuals for H3K27ac across prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, and cerebellum, 292 individuals for chromatin QTLs, and 18,025 plus 14,012 single cells from PsychENCODE and external sources.
Limitations
- The paper states that single-cell methods have limited sensitivity and missing values, making low-abundance transcripts and fine subcellular structures hard to quantify; it also assumes cell-type signature expression is relatively constant across individuals.
- The paper notes that cQTLs rely on one-dimensional chromatin signal and may miss three-dimensional architecture, that larger cohorts and additional chromatin assays are needed, and that the deep-learning model may help mainly polygenic traits rather than Mendelian or population-structure-correlated traits; liability estimates may be confounded by environmental variation.
- Evident from the text: raw genotype and sequencing data are restricted for privacy and require approval; the H3K27ac cohort of 50 individuals was primarily of European descent; enhancer variability across individuals and tissues is high, with only about 70% ± 15% of reference enhancers active per individual and saturation estimated after about 30 individuals.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 74 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The PFC datasets involve sampling from 1866 individuals.
“Overall, the datasets from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) involve sampling from 1866 individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All data were placed into a central publicly available resource that also integrates reprocessed data from ENCODE, CMC, GTEx, and Roadmap.
“All data have been placed into a central, publicly available resource that also integrates relevant reprocessed data from related projects, including ENCODE, the CommonMind Consortium (CMC), GTEx, and Roadmap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
PsychENCODE generated large-scale data including genotyping, bulk and single-cell RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and Hi-C.
“the PsychENCODE Consortium has generated large-scale data to provide insight into the brain and psychiatric disorders, including data derived through genotyping, bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq), assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq), and Hi-C (17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Akbarian S, The PsychENCODE project. Nat. Neurosci 18, 1707– 1712 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nn.4156; pmid: 26605881 26605881 PMC4675669 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The resource data represent a range of psychiatric disorders including SCZ, BPD, and ASD.
“These data represent a range of psychiatric disorders, including SCZ, bipolar disorder (BPD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The PsychENCODE Consortium produced a comprehensive online resource for adult brain covering 1866 individuals.
“the PsychENCODE Consortium has generated a comprehensive online resource for the adult brain across 1866 individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Using the resource, the authors identified functional elements, QTLs, and regulatory-network linkages specific to adult brain.
“By using this resource, we identified functional elements, quantitative-trait loci (QTLs), and regulatory-network linkages specific to the adult brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The resource contains 3810 genotype, transcriptome, chromatin, and Hi-C datasets from PsychENCODE and 1662 datasets from outside the consortium.
“In total, the resource contains 3810 genotype, transcriptome, chromatin, and Hi-C datasets from PsychENCODE and 1662 datasets obtained by using similar bulk assays merged from outside the consortium.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The authors combined elements and networks to build an integrated deep-learning model that predicts high-level traits from genotype via intermediate molecular phenotypes.
“we combined these elements and networks to build an integrated deep-learning model that predicts high-level traits from genotype via intermediate molecular phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A number of genes, such as DRD3, had expression levels that varied more across cell types than in bulk tissue measurements across individuals.
“In this matrix, a number of genes (e.g., the gene for dopamine receptor DRD3) had expression levels that varied more across cell types than they did in bulk tissue measurements across individuals in a population (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The authors assembled profiles of brain cell types including excitatory and inhibitory neurons, major nonneuronal types, and developmental cell types.
“Then we assembled profiles of brain cell types, including both excitatory and inhibitory neurons (denoted as Ex1 to Ex9 and In1 to In8, respectively, according to previous conventions), major nonneuronal types (e.g., microglia and astrocytes), and additional cell types associated with development (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
A very large fraction of the smaller GTEx and CMC brain eQTL sets was contained within the authors' set.
“a very large fraction of the smaller GTEx and CMC brain eQTL sets was contained within our set (as evident from overlap testing with the π1 statistic) (Fig. 4A) (36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Storey JD, Tibshirani R, Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 9440– 9445 (2003). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100; pmid: 12883005 12883005 PMC170937 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The authors identified about 2000 cQTLs in addition to 6200 identified from the CMC cohort.
“Overall, we identified ~2000 cQTLs in addition to 6200 identified from individuals within the CMC cohort (39).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Bryois J, Evaluation of chromatin accessibility in prefrontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia. Nat. Commun 9, 3121 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05379-y; pmid: 30087329 30087329 PMC6081462 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
All samples for adult brain regions tend to separate markedly from other tissues in terms of A-B compartment similarity and other metrics.
“we found that all the samples for adult brain regions tend to separate markedly from the other tissues in terms of A-B compartment similarity and other metrics (Fig. 5D and fig. S38).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The total number of overlapping QTLs was 2477, dubbed multi-QTLs.
“Overall, the total number of overlapping QTLs was 2477 (which we dub multi-QTLs) (Fig. 4F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of eGenes approaches the total number of genes estimated to be expressed in the brain.
“The number of eGenes, in fact, approaches the total number of genes estimated to be expressed in the brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For brain, intertissue comparisons exhibit more differences than intratissue ones.
“for the brain, intertissue comparisons exhibit more differences than intratissue ones (figs. S27 to S30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
NMF-17 is correlated with the Ex2 cell type with r = 0.63.
“component NMF-17 is correlated with the Ex2 cell type (correlation coefficient r = 0.63) (Fig. 2C and fig. S9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Only about 31% of interactions in adult Hi-C data were detected in the fetal dataset.
“Only ~31% of the interactions in our adult Hi-C data were detected in the fetal dataset (figs. S39 and S40) (13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Won H, Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain. Nature 538, 523– 527 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nature19847; pmid: 27760116 27760116 PMC5358922 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
The authors generated potential cell-type-specific regulatory networks.
“As functioning regulatory connections reflect cell type, we also generated potential cell-type–specific regulatory networks (Fig. 5, F and G, and fig. S44).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For unannotated regions, brain tissues such as cortex and CB have a greater extent of transcription than any other tissue.
“when we shift to unannotated regions, the ordering changes: Brain tissues, such as the cortex and CB, now have a greater extent of transcription than any other tissue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The paper reports construction of a complete regulatory network that connects enhancers, transcription factors, and target genes.
“Collectively, we generated a full regulatory network, linking enhancers, TFs, and target genes (fig. S42).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other genes associated with brain aging, such as EGR1 and CP, exhibit different trends.
“Other genes known to be associated with brain aging, such as those for EGR1 (early growth response) and CP (ceruloplasmin), exhibit different trends (Fig. 2F and figs. S20 and S21) (21, 31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31] Tacutu R, Human ageing genomic resources: New and updated databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (D1), D1083– D1090 (2018). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1042; pmid: 29121237 29121237 PMC5753192 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The expression of ASD-associated gene CHD8 could be predicted with MSE = 0.034 (R2 = 0.77 over the population).
“we could predict the expression of the ASD-associated gene CHD8 with MSE = 0.034 (equivalent to coefficient of determination R2 = 0.77 over the population) (21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Elastic net regression assumes target gene expression is determined by a linear combination of expression levels of regulating TFs via regression coefficients.
- Findingown data
The authors found differences in unannotated noncoding and intergenic regions.
“we also found differences in unannotated noncoding and intergenic regions (fig. S30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The brain eQTL set showed higher π1 similarity to and SNP-eGene overlap with GTEx brain eQTLs than with those from other tissues.
“our brain eQTL set showed higher π1 similarity to and SNP-eGene overlap with GTEx brain eQTLs than with those from other tissues (Fig. 4B and fig. S31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors identified 1672 distinct SNPs constituting 4199 fQTLs.
“In total, we identified 1672 distinct SNPs constituting 4199 fQTLs (fig. S34).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A subset of regulatory connections could predict the expression of 8930 genes with MSE < 0.05.
“Overall, we found that a subset of regulatory connections could predict the expression of 8930 genes with a mean square error (MSE) of <0.05 (fig. S43).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Elastic net regression assumes target gene expression is determined by a linear combination of expression levels of regulating TFs via regression coefficients.
- Findingown data
Excitatory neurons Ex4 and Ex5 were associated with the most fQTLs (1060 and 896, respectively).
“The excitatory neurons Ex4 and Ex5 were associated with the most fQTLs (1060 and 896, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The authors annotated a reference set of 79,056 enhancers in the PFC.
“The PsychENCODE resource contains ~79,000 brain-active enhancers, sets of Hi-C linkages, and topologically associating domains;”
- Also stated in: § Enhancers · plain
“Overall, we annotated a reference set of 79,056 enhancers in the PFC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Enhancers · plain
- Findingown data
PFC was more similar to TC than CB, with about 90% versus 34% overlap in peaks.
“the PFC was more similar to the TC than the CB (~90% versus 34% overlap in peaks).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The regulatory network contains 43,181 proximal and 42,681 distal linkages involving 11,573 protein-encoding target genes.
“This includes 43,181 proximal and 42,681 distal linkages involving 11,573 protein-encoding target genes (TF–to–target gene via promoter for proximal versus via enhancer–target gene connection for distal) (Fig. 5A) (15, 21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Saliba AE, Westermann AJ, Gorski SA, Vogel J, Single-cell RNA-seq: Advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845– 8860 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nar/gku555; pmid: 25053837 25053837 PMC4132710 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
In total, 202,940 SNPs were involved in residual eQTLs.
“In total, this results in 202,940 SNPs involved in residual eQTLs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The cQTL overlap with eQTLs was larger than the fQTL overlap (π1 0.89 versus 0.11).
“we calculated π1 statistics and found that the cQTL overlap was larger than the fQTL overlap (0.89 versus 0.11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the cell-type-specific networks, the authors found well-known transcription factors associated with brain development, including NEUROG1, DLGAP2, and MEF2A for excitatory neurons and GAD1, GAD2, and LHX6 for inhibitory neurons.
“In these, we found a number of well-known TFs associated with brain development—e.g., NEUROG1, DLGAP2, and MEF2A for excitatory neurons and GAD1, GAD2, and LHX6 for inhibitory neurons (Fig. 5G) (43–46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [43] Fode C, A role for neural determination genes in specifying the dorsoventral identity of telencephalic neurons. Genes Dev. 14, 67– 80 (2000). pmid: 10640277 10640277 PMC316337 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Rasmussen AH, Rasmussen HB, Silahtaroglu A, The DLGAP family: Neuronal expression, function and role in brain disorders. Mol. Brain 10, 43 (2017). doi: 10.1186/s13041-017-0324-9; pmid: 28870203 28870203 PMC5583998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Erlander MG, Tillakaratne NJ, Feldblum S, Patel N, Tobin AJ, Two genes encode distinct glutamate decarboxylases. Neuron 7, 91– 100 (1991). doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90077-D; pmid: 2069816 2069816 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Liodis P, Lhx6 activity is required for the normal migration and specification of cortical interneuron subtypes. J. Neurosci 27, 3078– 3089 (2007). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3055-06.2007; pmid: 17376969 17376969 PMC6672459 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Particular excitatory and inhibitory neuron types, such as In6, have different fractions in male and female samples.
“particular types of excitatory and inhibitory neurons (such as In6) are present different fractions in male and female samples (Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Findingown data
QTLs involving SNPs distal to eGenes but linked by Hi-C interactions showed significantly stronger associations than those with SNPs directly in the eGene promoter or exons.
“QTLs involving SNPs distal to eGenes but linked by Hi-C interactions showed significantly stronger associations (as indicated by the QTL P value) than those with SNPs directly in the eGene promoter or exons (Fig. 5C and fig. S37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
H3K27ac chromatin levels at all regulatory positions were overall less distinguishable between brain and other tissues.
“The H3K27ac chromatin levels at all regulatory positions were, overall, less distinguishable between the brain and other tissues (Fig. 3C) (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
RCA revealed that brain separates from other tissues in the first component.
“For gene expression, RCA revealed that the brain separates from the other tissues in the first component (Fig. 3E and fig. S26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors' deconvolution results explained more variation than previous deconvolution approaches.
“Also, our results explained more variation than previous deconvolution approaches (fig. S13) (21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Findingown data
Fetus-linked genes were preferentially expressed in developmental cell types.
“the fetus-linked genes were preferentially expressed in developmental cell types (Fig. 5F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Testes and lung have the largest extent of transcription overall for protein-coding genes.
“testes and lung have the largest extent of transcription overall (the most genes transcribed) for protein-coding genes (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The per-person reconstruction accuracy varies by ±4% across the 1866 individuals.
“when calculated on a per-person basis, this quantity varies ±4% over the 1866 individuals in our cohort (figs. S11 and S12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Findingown data
The prefrontal cortex transcriptome appears substantially less predictive with respect to gender than age.
“However, even when the DSPN performance is low, it may still provide insights about intermediate phenotypes; for instance, in our analysis, the PFC transcriptome appears substantially less predictive with respect to gender (after removing the sex chromosome genes) than age, but this very fact highlights the similarity of the transcriptome between sexes (60).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The authors developed an interpretable deep-learning framework, the Deep Structured Phenotype Network (DSPN).
“In particular, we developed an interpretable deep-learning framework, the Deep Structured Phenotype Network (DSPN) (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The full interaction between genotype and phenotype involves many levels beyond those encapsulated by the regulatory network.
- Findingown data
The authors found aggregate associations between brain eQTLs and enhancers and many brain disorder GWAS variants, much more so than for non-brain diseases.
“In particular, we found aggregate associations between our brain eQTLs and enhancers and many brain disorder GWAS variants, much more so than for GWAS variants for non-brain diseases (Fig. 6F and table S9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Varying proportions of basic cell types (with different expression signatures) accounted for a large fraction of the expression variation across a population of individuals.
“Second, in terms of single-cell analysis, we found that varying proportions of basic cell types (with different expression signatures) accounted for a large fraction of the expression variation across a population of individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The expression levels characterizing a signature are fairly constant over a population of cells of a given cell type.
- Findingown data
Cross-disorder prioritized modules are associated with functional categories such as immune processes, synaptic activity, and splicing.
“In particular, we found that cross-disorder prioritized modules are associated with functional categories such as “immune processes,” “synaptic activity,” and “splicing,” consistent with the findings from more disease-focused analyses (Fig. 8C) (22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Gandal MJ, Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). 30545856 PMC6443102 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
A logistic predictor gained a 2.4-fold improvement when including the transcriptome versus using the genome alone (+9.3% vs +3.8% above a 50% random baseline).
“For instance, a logistic predictor was able to gain a 2.4-fold improvement when including the transcriptome versus using the genome alone (+9.3% for the transcriptome versus +3.8% for the genome, above a 50% random baseline).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prioritized schizophrenia and bipolar disorder modules are enriched for known GWAS SNPs.
“Also, we showed that prioritized SCZ and BPD modules are enriched for known GWAS SNPs (fig. S51) (for ASD, the lack of GWAS SNPs precludes similar analyses).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of these, 321 genes form a high-confidence subset backed by more than two lines of evidence.
“Of these, 321 constitute a “high-confidence” set supported by more than two evidence sources (e.g., QTLs and Hi-C) (Fig. 6, A and B, and fig. S45); examples include the CHRNA2 and CACNA1C genes (Fig. 6, B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The extra layers of structure in the DSPN allowed substantially better trait prediction than traditional additive models.
“Using the full model with the genome and transcriptome data provided, we demonstrated that the extra layers of structure in the DSPN allowed us to achieve substantially better trait prediction than traditional additive models (Fig. 7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors identified transcription factors regulating the schizophrenia genes, either directly or via an enhancer.
“Next, we identified the TFs regulating the SCZ genes (on the basis of our regulatory network, either directly or via an enhancer) (Fig. 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The DSPN is constructed via a series of intermediate models that add layers of structure.
“In contrast, the DSPN is constructed via a series of intermediate models that add layers of structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The authors developed a comprehensive resource for functional genomics of the adult brain by integrating PsychENCODE data with a broad range of publicly available datasets.
“We have developed a comprehensive resource for functional genomics of the adult brain by integrating PsychENCODE data with a broad range of publicly available datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors' best liability scores from just the genotype at QTL-associated variants are substantially below these bounds.
“Our best liability scores (from just the genotype at QTL-associated variants) are substantially below these bounds, implying that additional data would be beneficial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The transcription factors regulating schizophrenia genes include LHX9 and SOX7.
“These include LHX9 and SOX7, TFs critical for early cortical specification and neuronal apoptosis, respectively (48, 49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The DSPN combines a Deep Boltzmann Machine architecture with conditional and lateral connections derived from the regulatory network.
“This model combines a Deep Boltzmann Machine architecture with conditional and lateral connections derived from the regulatory network (50).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Salakhutdinov R, Hinton G, “ Deep Boltzmann machines,” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat 5, 448– 455 (2009).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The DSPN gained a larger, 6-fold improvement (+22.9% vs +3.8%).
“By contrast, the DSPN was able to gain a larger, 6-fold improvement (+22.9% versus +3.8%), which may reflect its ability to incorporate nonlinear interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The schizophrenia genes are highly expressed in neurons, particularly excitatory ones.
“Lastly, we integrated the SCZ genes with single-cell profiles and found that they are highly expressed in neurons, particularly excitatory ones, consistent with the recent findings (Fig. 6E) (47).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Pardiñas AF, Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat. Genet 50, 381– 389 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2; pmid: 29483656 29483656 PMC5918692 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The authors used sparse inter- and intralevel connectivity to integrate knowledge of QTLs, regulatory networks, and coexpression modules.
“Finally, we used sparse inter- and intralevel connectivity to integrate our knowledge of QTLs, regulatory networks, and coexpression modules from the sections above (Fig. 7B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
By integrating regulatory-network connectivity and latent factors, the DSPN improves trait prediction over traditional additive models.
“In particular, by integrating regulatory-network connectivity and latent factors, the DSPN improves trait prediction over traditional additive models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors were able to identify a substantial number of cQTLs.
“Moreover, we were able to identify a substantial number of cQTLs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 142 schizophrenia GWAS loci, the authors identified 1111 putative schizophrenia-associated genes covering 119 loci.
“In particular, for the 142 SCZ GWAS loci, we identified a set of 1111 putative SCZ-associated genes, covering 119 loci (the SCZ genes) (Fig. 6A) (47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Pardiñas AF, Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat. Genet 50, 381– 389 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2; pmid: 29483656 29483656 PMC5918692 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The majority of schizophrenia genes were not in linkage disequilibrium with the index SNPs (~67%, or 748 of 1111 genes with r2 < 0.6).
“The majority of SCZ genes were not even in LD with the index SNPs (~67%, or 748 of 1111 genes with r2 < 0.6) (fig. S45), consistent with the fact that regulatory relationships often do not follow linear genome organization (13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For most GWAS variants associated with neuropsychiatric disease, the molecular mechanisms affecting the brain are poorly understood.
“for most of these variants, we have little understanding of the molecular mechanisms affecting the brain (7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Cichon S, Genomewide association studies: History, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 540– 556 (2009). doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08091354; pmid: 19339359 19339359 PMC3894622 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Cell-type changes across individuals could contribute substantially to variation in individual bulk expression levels.
“This suggests that cell-type changes across individuals could contribute substantially to variation in individual bulk expression levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Study design and conductcitation
Single-cell RNA-seq data from PsychENCODE and other brain studies were uniformly processed with standard pipelines.
“we used standard pipelines to uniformly process single-cell RNA-seq data from PsychENCODE, in conjunction with other single-cell studies on the brain (14, 16, 20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] Lake BB, Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 352, 1586– 1590 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1204; pmid: 27339989 27339989 PMC5038589 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Darmanis S, A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7285– 7290 (2015). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507125112; pmid: 26060301 26060301 PMC4466750 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [20] Lake BB, Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. Nat. Biotechnol 36, 70– 80 (2018). doi: 10.1038/nbt.4038; pmid: 29227469 29227469 PMC5951394 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Expression values of biomarker genes for the same cell type were correlated between the TPM and UMI formats.
“Moreover, the expression values of biomarker genes for the same cell type were correlated between two formats (figs. S6 and S7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Hi-C and single-cell sequencing had not been fully integrated at scale with brain genomics data.
“new methodologies, such as Hi-C and single-cell sequencing, have yet to be fully integrated at scale with brain genomics data (13–16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [13] Won H, Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain. Nature 538, 523– 527 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nature19847; pmid: 27760116 27760116 PMC5358922 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Lake BB, Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 352, 1586– 1590 (2016). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1204; pmid: 27339989 27339989 PMC5038589 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Saliba AE, Westermann AJ, Gorski SA, Vogel J, Single-cell RNA-seq: Advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845– 8860 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nar/gku555; pmid: 25053837 25053837 PMC4132710 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Darmanis S, A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7285– 7290 (2015). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507125112; pmid: 26060301 26060301 PMC4466750 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
An appreciable number of eQTLs were enriched on the promoter of a different gene from the one regulated, suggesting Epromoter activity.
“an appreciable number of eQTLs were enriched on the promoter of a different gene from the one regulated, suggesting the activity of an Epromoter, a regulatory element with dual promoter and enhancer functions (41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Dao LTM, Genome-wide characterization of mammalian promoters with distal enhancer functions. Nat. Genet 49, 1073– 1081 (2017). doi: 10.1038/ng.3884; pmid: 28581502 28581502 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Enhancer-binding TFs with high regression coefficients provide a third set of putative enhancer-to-gene links.
“the enhancer-binding TFs with high regression coefficients—implying a high chance for TF regulation of the target genes via particular bound enhancers—provide a third set of putative enhancer-to-gene links.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Elastic net regression assumes target gene expression is determined by a linear combination of expression levels of regulating TFs via regression coefficients.
- Interpretationown data
An unsupervised analysis derived solely from bulk data can roughly recapitulate single-cell signatures, partially corroborating them.
“This demonstrates that an unsupervised analysis derived solely from bulk data can roughly recapitulate the single-cell signatures, partially corroborating them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Interpretationreasoning
The lower distinguishability of chromatin likely reflects that there are proportionately fewer brain-active regulatory elements than protein-coding genes (6% versus 60%).
“As the total number of human regulatory elements is much larger than the number of brain-active enhancers (~1.3 million versus ~79,000), our results likely reflect the fact that there are proportionately fewer brain-active regulatory elements than protein-coding genes (6% versus 60%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Estimated fractions of NEU+/- cells matched experimentally determined fractions from reference brain samples, with median difference 0.04.
“As a validation, our estimated fractions of NEU+/− cells matched the experimentally determined fractions from reference brain samples (median difference = 0.04) (fig. S10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Interpretationreasoning
The DSPN may be able to capture the effects of rare variants, such as those implicated in autism spectrum disorder, through their influence on intermediate phenotypes.
“Finally, although our focus has been on common SNPs, the DSPN may be able to capture the effects of rare variants, such as those known to be implicated in ASD (51), through their influence on intermediate phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Anttila V, Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360, eaap8757 (2018). doi: 10.1126/science.aap8757; pmid: 29930110 29930110 PMC6097237 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
These estimates may be confounded by trait-associated variation that is environmental in origin.
“However, these estimates may be confounded by trait-associated variation that is environmental in origin (fig. S47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Nonlinear predictors can exceed these limits.
“By contrast, nonlinear predictors can exceed these limits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Current single-cell techniques suffer from low sensitivity and dropouts, making it challenging to reliably quantify low-abundance transcripts.
“In addition, current single-cell techniques suffer from low sensitivity and dropouts; thus, it remains challenging to reliably quantify low-abundance transcripts (15, 53).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Saliba AE, Westermann AJ, Gorski SA, Vogel J, Single-cell RNA-seq: Advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845– 8860 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nar/gku555; pmid: 25053837 25053837 PMC4132710 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [53] Liu S, Trapnell C, Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: Recent advances and remaining challenges. F1000Res. 5, 10.12688/f1000research.7223.1 (2016). pmid: 26949524 PMC4758375 26949524 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results demonstrate the usefulness of even a limited amount of functional genomic information for unraveling gene-disease relationships.
“Overall, these results demonstrate the usefulness of even a limited amount of functional genomic information for unraveling gene-disease relationships and show that the structure learned from such data can be used to make more accurate predictions of observed traits, even on samples for which intermediate phenotypes are imputed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
This is particularly the case for specific brain cell substructures, such as axons and dendrites.
“This is particularly the case for specific brain cell substructures, such as axons and dendrites (15).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Saliba AE, Westermann AJ, Gorski SA, Vogel J, Single-cell RNA-seq: Advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845– 8860 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nar/gku555; pmid: 25053837 25053837 PMC4132710 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
A key aspect of the DSPN is its interpretability.
“A key aspect of the DSPN is its interpretability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Regulatory relationships often do not follow linear genome organization.
“The majority of SCZ genes were not even in LD with the index SNPs (~67%, or 748 of 1111 genes with r2 < 0.6) (fig. S45), consistent with the fact that regulatory relationships often do not follow linear genome organization (13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Won H, Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain. Nature 538, 523– 527 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nature19847; pmid: 27760116 27760116 PMC5358922 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Prior studies estimated that common SNPs explain 25.6, 20.5, and 19% of the genetic variance for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism spectrum disorder, respectively.
“Prior studies have estimated that common SNPs explain 25.6, 20.5, and 19% of the genetic variance for SCZ, BPD, and ASD, respectively (51).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Anttila V, Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360, eaap8757 (2018). doi: 10.1126/science.aap8757; pmid: 29930110 29930110 PMC6097237 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The DSPN's larger improvement may reflect its ability to incorporate nonlinear interactions.
“By contrast, the DSPN was able to gain a larger, 6-fold improvement (+22.9% versus +3.8%), which may reflect its ability to incorporate nonlinear interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The DSPN takes into account dependencies between gene expression levels not modeled by univariate eQTL methods.
“Moreover, it takes into account dependencies between gene expression levels not modeled by univariate eQTL methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These estimates may be taken as theoretical upper bounds for additive models, given unlimited common-variant data.
“These may be taken as theoretical upper bounds for additive models, given unlimited common-variant data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The structure learned from such data can be used to make more accurate predictions of observed traits, even on samples for which intermediate phenotypes are imputed.
“Overall, these results demonstrate the usefulness of even a limited amount of functional genomic information for unraveling gene-disease relationships and show that the structure learned from such data can be used to make more accurate predictions of observed traits, even on samples for which intermediate phenotypes are imputed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Integrative analyses demonstrate the usefulness of functional genomics for unraveling molecular mechanisms in the brain.
“In summary, our integrative analyses demonstrate the usefulness of functional genomics for unraveling molecular mechanisms in the brain (21, 61), and the results of these analyses suggest directions for further research into the etiology of brain disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [61] Li M, Integrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks. Science 362, eaat7615 (2018). 30545854 PMC6413317 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The separation between univariate eQTL detection and multivariate integrative modeling allows direct comparison of their eQTLs with those from previous analyses, such as the CMC study.
“This separation we make between univariate eQTL detection and multivariate integrative modeling allows us to compare our eQTLs directly with those from previous analyses, such as the CMC study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Even when DSPN performance is low, it may still provide insights about intermediate phenotypes.
“However, even when the DSPN performance is low, it may still provide insights about intermediate phenotypes; for instance, in our analysis, the PFC transcriptome appears substantially less predictive with respect to gender (after removing the sex chromosome genes) than age, but this very fact highlights the similarity of the transcriptome between sexes (60).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This fact highlights the similarity of the transcriptome between sexes.
“However, even when the DSPN performance is low, it may still provide insights about intermediate phenotypes; for instance, in our analysis, the PFC transcriptome appears substantially less predictive with respect to gender (after removing the sex chromosome genes) than age, but this very fact highlights the similarity of the transcriptome between sexes (60).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Evgrafov OV, Gene expression in patient-derived neural progenitors provide insights into neurodevelopmental aspects of schizophrenia. bioRxiv 209197 [ Preprint]. 26 10 2017. doi: 10.1101/209197 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 44
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe resource has single-cell RNA-seq data for 18,025 cells from PsychENCODE and 14,012 cells from outside sources.
“The resource also has single-cell RNA-seq data for 18,025 cells from PsychENCODE and 14,012 cells from outside sources (20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Lake BB, Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. Nat. Biotechnol 36, 70– 80 (2018). doi: 10.1038/nbt.4038; pmid: 29227469 29227469 PMC5951394 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe resource enables construction of a gene regulatory network linking GWAS variants to genes, including 321 genes for schizophrenia.
“It also allows building of a gene regulatory network, linking genome-wide association study variants to genes (e.g., 321 for schizophrenia).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many GWAS variants associated with neuropsychiatric disease lie in noncoding regions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntegration of the resource shows that variation in cell-type proportions largely explains cross-population expression variation, with over 88% reconstruction accuracy.
“Integration shows that varying cell-type proportions largely account for the cross-population variation in expression (with >88% reconstruction accuracy).”
- Also stated in: § Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell · hedged
“weighted combinations of single-cell signatures could account for most of the population-level expression variation, with an accuracy of >88% (Fig. 2D)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
- Also stated in: § Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors identified noncoding regions of transcription and sets of differentially expressed and coexpressed genes.
“Using these data, we identified noncoding regions of transcription and sets of differentially expressed and coexpressed genes (21, 22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22] Gandal MJ, Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). 30545856 PMC6443102 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEmbedding the network into an interpretable deep-learning model improves disease prediction by about sixfold compared with polygenic risk scores and identifies key genes and pathways in psychiatric disorders.
“We embed this network into an interpretable deep-learning model, which improves disease prediction by ~6-fold versus polygenic risk scores and identifies key genes and pathways in psychiatric disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many GWAS variants associated with neuropsychiatric disease lie in noncoding regions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe cell-type profiles were in two formats, TPM and UMI counts.
“Depending on the underlying sequencing and quantification, our profiles were of two fundamentally different formats, transcripts per kilobase million (TPM) and unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn average, only about 70% ± 15% (about 54,000) of reference enhancers were active in an individual in the cohort, and 68% were active in more than half the cohort.
“On average, only ~70% ± 15% (~54,000) of the enhancers in the reference brain were active in an individual in the cohort, and a similar fraction of the reference enhancers was active in more than half the cohort (68%) (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFZD9 expression levels were associated with a neighboring noncoding SNP via an eQTL, and the same SNP was associated with the proportion of Ex3 cells via an fQTL.
“We found that the expression levels of this gene were associated with a neighboring noncoding SNP via an eQTL, and this same SNP was associated with the proportion of Ex3 cells via an fQTL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataeQTLs tended to be enriched at promoters, cQTLs at enhancers and TF-binding sites, and fQTLs were spread over many different elements.
“As expected, eQTLs tended to be enriched at promoters, and cQTLs, at enhancers and transcription factor (TF)–binding sites; fQTLs were spread over many different elements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAggregating data across the cohort resulted in 37,761 H3K27ac peaks in PFC, 42,683 in TC, and 26,631 in CB, each present in more than half of individuals.
“Aggregating data across the cohort resulted in a total of 37,761 H3K27ac “peaks” (enriched regions) in the PFC, 42,683 in the TC, and 26,631 in the CB—where each peak is present in more than half of the individuals surveyed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors found 1,341,182 eQTL SNPs from about 5.3 million total SNPs tested in 1-Mb windows, constituting 238,194 independent SNPs after LD pruning.
“We found 1,341,182 eQTL single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from ~5.3 million total SNPs tested in 1-Mb windows around genes, constituting 238,194 independent SNPs after linkage-disequilibrium (LD) pruning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn individuals with ASD, the fraction of Ex5 was higher and that of oligodendrocytes lower, with some increase for microglia and astrocytes.
“in individuals with ASD, the fraction of Ex5 was higher and that of oligodendrocytes, lower, with some commensurate increase for microglia and astrocytes (Fig. 2E and fig. S18) (24, 29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [24] Gandal MJ, Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap. Science 359, 693– 697 (2018). doi: 10.1126/science.aad6469; pmid: 29439242 29439242 PMC5898828 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Rubenstein JL, Merzenich MM, Model of autism: Increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav. 2, 255– 267 (2003). doi: 10.1034/j.1601-183X.2003.00037.x; pmid: 14606691 14606691 PMC6748642 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWeighted combinations of single-cell signatures account for most population-level expression variation, with accuracy over 88%.
“weighted combinations of single-cell signatures could account for most of the population-level expression variation, with an accuracy of >88% (Fig. 2D) (1 − ||B − CW||2/||B||2 > 88%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe top NMF components of bulk expression variation were consistently associated with single-cell signatures.
“we decomposed the bulk gene expression matrix by using nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) (B ≈ VH, where B, V, and H represent matrices) and determined whether the top components (NMF-TCs), capturing the majority of covariance (columns of V) (Fig. 2B), were consistently associated with the single-cell signatures (Fig. 2C) (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the PFC, the authors identified about 2.5 million cis-eQTLs involving about 33,000 eGenes, with about 17,000 noncoding and about 16,000 coding, at FDR < 0.05.
“In the PFC, we identified ~2.5 million cis-eQTLs involving ~33,000 eGenes (expressed genes) [~17,000 noncoding and ~16,000 coding, with a false discovery rate of <0.05] (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors identified 2735 TADs and about 90,000 enhancer-promoter interactions.
“In total, we identified 2735 topologically associating domains (TADs) and ~90,000 enhancer-promoter interactions (fig. S36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith increasing age, fractions Ex3 and Ex4 significantly increased and fractions of some nonneuronal types decreased.
“with increasing age, the fractions Ex3 and Ex4 significantly increased and the fractions of some nonneuronal types decreased (Fig. 2F and fig. S19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFetus-linked genes were highly expressed in adult neurons, whereas adult-linked ones were preferentially expressed in glia.
“They were also highly expressed in adult neurons, whereas the adult-linked ones were preferentially expressed in glia, reflecting known cell-type composition (Fig. 5, D and F) (42).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] de la Torre-Ubieta L, Won H, Stein JL, Geschwind DH, Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics. Nat. Med 22, 345– 361 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nm.4071; pmid: 27050589 27050589 PMC5072455 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdult brain Hi-C datasets clustered together, while the fetal brain Hi-C dataset was distinct.
“whereas Hi-C datasets for the adult brain clustered together, the Hi-C dataset for the fetal brain was distinct (Fig. 5D and fig. S39).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFetus-linked genes were more highly expressed prenatally and adult-linked ones postnatally.
“we found fetus-linked genes to be more highly expressed prenatally and adult-linked ones postnatally (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAbout 75% of enhancer-promoter interactions occurred within the same TAD, and genes with more enhancers tended to have higher expression.
“As expected, ~75% of enhancer-promoter interactions occurred within the same TAD, and genes with more enhancers tended to have higher expression (Fig. 5B and fig. S36).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe cumulative number of active regions increased for the first 20 individuals sampled but saturated at the 30th.
“This increased for the first 20 individuals sampled but saturated at the 30th.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe authors provide an expanded regulatory network with slightly different parameterization.
“Lastly, for broad utility on the resource website, we also provide an expanded regulatory network with slightly different parameterization (fig. S42).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors developed a comprehensive deep-learning model, the DSPN, and used it to illustrate how functional genomics data could improve the link between genotype and phenotype.
“Third, we developed a comprehensive deep-learning model, the DSPN, and used it to illustrate how functional genomics data could improve the link between genotype and phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The full interaction between genotype and phenotype involves many levels beyond those encapsulated by the regulatory network.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe authors take an unbiased view of all 5024 modules and higher-order groupings and prioritize a subset of ~180 modules and groupings for each psychiatric disorder, showing these to be enriched in specific functional categories and to intersect substantially with modules from more disease-focused analyses.
“Broadly, we take an unbiased view of all 5024 modules and higher-order groupings constructed from these and then prioritize a subset of ~180 modules and groupings for each psychiatric disorder, showing these to be enriched in specific functional categories and to intersect substantially with the modules from more disease-focused analyses (Fig. 8, B and C, and fig. S49) (22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Gandal MJ, Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). 30545856 PMC6443102 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 1111 schizophrenia genes (and the 321 high-confidence subset) resembled known schizophrenia-associated genes in several ways, showing enrichment for translational regulators, cholinergic receptors, calcium channels, synaptic genes, schizophrenia differentially expressed genes, and loss-of-function-intolerant genes.
“As expected, they shared many characteristics with known SCZ-associated genes, being enriched in translational regulators, cholinergic receptors, calcium channels, synaptic genes, SCZ differentially expressed genes, and loss-of-function-intolerant genes (fig. S45) (47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Pardiñas AF, Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat. Genet 50, 381– 389 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2; pmid: 29483656 29483656 PMC5918692 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe schizophrenia genes represent an increase from the 22 genes reported in an earlier QTL study and a larger number than can be linked by genomic proximity (176).
“Overall, the SCZ genes represent an increase from the 22 genes reported in an earlier QTL study and a larger number than can be linked simply by genomic proximity (176) (Fig. 6A) (11, 47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Fromer M, Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Nat. Neurosci 19, 1442– 1453 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nn.4399; pmid: 27668389 27668389 PMC5083142 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [47] Pardiñas AF, Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat. Genet 50, 381– 389 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2; pmid: 29483656 29483656 PMC5918692 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBy using a generative architecture, the DSPN can impute intermediate phenotypes and provide forward predictions from genotypes to traits.
“By using a generative architecture, we ensure that the model is able to impute intermediate phenotypes, as well as provide forward predictions from genotypes to traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe authors identified a set of eQTLs several times as large as those in previous studies, targeting a saturating proportion of protein-coding genes.
“First, in terms of QTLs, we identified a set of eQTLs several times as large as those in previous studies, targeting a saturating proportion of protein-coding genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe variance explained by the full DSPN model exceeds that explained by common SNPs in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (32.8 and 37.4% respectively; autism spectrum disorder 11.3% slightly lower).
“By contrast, the variance explained by the full DSPN model exceeds that explained by common SNPs in SCZ and BPD, possibly reflecting the influence of rare variants and epistatic interactions (32.8 and 37.4% respectively—the variance of 11.3% for ASD is slightly lower).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationOther prioritized modules include well-characterized genes such as MIAT, RBFOX1, and ANK2 (schizophrenia); RELA, NFkB2, and NIPBL (autism); and HOMER1 (bipolar disorder).
“Other prioritized modules include well-characterized genes such as MIAT, RBFOX1, and ANK2 (SCZ); RELA, NFkB2, and NIPBL (ASD); and HOMER1 (BPD), consistent with the results of (22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Gandal MJ, Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). 30545856 PMC6443102 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataModules associated with aging are enriched in Ex4 neuronal cell-type genes, synaptic and longevity functions, and the gene NRGN.
“Finally, we identify modules associated with aging, finding that they are enriched in Ex4 neuronal cell-type genes, synaptic and longevity functions, and the gene NRGN—all consistent with differential expression analysis (Fig. 8D and fig. S20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe DSPN includes layers for intermediate molecular phenotypes, predefined gene groupings, higher layers for inferred groupings, and a top layer for observed traits.
“We included layers for intermediate molecular phenotypes associated with specific genes (i.e., their gene expression and chromatin state) and predefined gene groupings (cell-type marker genes and coexpression modules), multiple higher layers for inferred groupings (hidden nodes), and a top layer for observed traits (psychiatric disorders and other brain phenotypes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors determined which modules were prioritized and the sets of genes associated with latent nodes at each hidden layer.
“Using it, we determined which modules were prioritized, as well as the sets of genes associated with latent nodes that were found at each hidden layer (Fig. 8A and table S10) (15, 21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Saliba AE, Westermann AJ, Gorski SA, Vogel J, Single-cell RNA-seq: Advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845– 8860 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nar/gku555; pmid: 25053837 25053837 PMC4132710 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe DSPN allows joint inference and imputation of intermediate phenotypes and observed traits from genotype alone, achieving a ~3.1-fold improvement over a logistic predictor.
“Moreover, the DSPN allows us to perform joint inference and imputation of intermediate phenotypes (i.e., transcriptome and epigenome) and observed traits from just the genotype alone, achieving a ~3.1-fold improvement over a logistic predictor in this context (Fig. 7C and fig. S46).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFor schizophrenia, the authors find enrichments for pathways and genes known to be associated with the disease, including glutamatergic-synapse pathway genes such as GRIN1; calcium-signaling pathway and astrocyte-marker genes; and complement cascade pathway genes such as C4A, C4B, and CLU.
“For SCZ, which is the best characterized of the three disorders, we find enrichments for pathways and genes known to be associated with the disease, including glutamatergic-synapse pathway genes, such as GRIN1; calcium-signaling pathway and astrocyte-marker genes; and complement cascade pathway genes such as C4A, C4B, and CLU (Fig. 8D) (22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Gandal MJ, Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). 30545856 PMC6443102 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationPsychENCODE developed a reference brain project on the PFC using matched assays on the same brain tissues, which was used to develop an anchoring annotation.
“PsychENCODE has developed a reference brain project on the PFC by using matched assays on the same set of brain tissues, which we used to develop an anchoring annotation (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationENCODE and Roadmap Epigenomics identified noncoding regions acting as enhancers and promoters.
“the ENCODE and Roadmap Epigenomics (Roadmap) projects have identified noncoding regions acting as enhancers and promoters (8–10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Battle A, Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550, 204– 213 (2017). doi: 10.1038/nature24277; pmid: 29022597 29022597 PMC5776756 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Kundaje A, Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317– 330 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature14248; pmid: 25693563 25693563 PMC4530010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] ENCODE Project Consortium, An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57– 74 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11247; pmid: 22955616 22955616 PMC3439153 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningRNA-seq data from PsychENCODE, GTEx, and Roadmap were uniformly processed with the standardized ENCODE pipeline, making expression data and subsequent results comparable with previous work.
“we took a conservative approach and used the standardized and established ENCODE pipeline to uniformly process RNA-seq data from PsychENCODE, GTEx, and Roadmap (figs. S2 and S3).”
- Also stated in: § Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell · plain
“This consistency makes our expression data and subsequent results (including eQTLs and single-cell analyses) comparable with previous work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGTEx has associated many noncoding variants with expression quantitative-trait loci.
“the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project has associated many noncoding variants with expression quantitative-trait loci (eQTLs)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Battle A, Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550, 204– 213 (2017). doi: 10.1038/nature24277; pmid: 29022597 29022597 PMC5776756 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Kundaje A, Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317– 330 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature14248; pmid: 25693563 25693563 PMC4530010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] ENCODE Project Consortium, An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57– 74 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11247; pmid: 22955616 22955616 PMC3439153 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Psychiatric Genomics Consortium has identified 142 GWAS loci associated with schizophrenia.
“the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) has identified 142 GWAS loci associated with schizophrenia (SCZ) (6)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Geschwind DH, Flint J, Genetics and genomics of psychiatric disease. Science 349, 1489– 1494 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8954; pmid: 26404826 26404826 PMC4694563 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBoth TPM and UMI profiles share common neuronal and major nonneuronal cell types and are used interchangeably in analyses.
“Both formats share common neuronal and major nonneuronal cell types and are used interchangeably in various analyses in this study (fig. S5 and tables S3 and S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInitial brain-specific functional genomics work provided greater insight but could be enhanced with larger sample sizes.
“Initial work focusing on brain-specific functional genomics has provided greater insight but could be enhanced with larger sample sizes (11, 12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Fromer M, Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Nat. Neurosci 19, 1442– 1453 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nn.4399; pmid: 27668389 27668389 PMC5083142 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Colantuoni C, Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature 478, 519– 523 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nature10524; pmid: 22031444 22031444 PMC3510670 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRCA captures local structure while maintaining meaningful distances globally.
“RCA is a compromise (21): It captures local structure while maintaining meaningful distances globally.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationH3K27ac data from PFC, TC, and CB were uniformly processed on a cohort of 50 individuals, primarily of European descent and sequenced to similar depths.
“we uniformly processed the H3K27ac data from the PFC, temporal cortex (TC), and cerebellum (CB) on a cohort of 50 individuals, primarily of European descent and sequenced to similar depths (21) (fig. S24).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Interpretationown dataPooling PFC enhancers from about 30 individuals is sufficient to cover nearly all possible PFC enhancer regions, estimated at about 120,000.
“Thus, we hypothesize that pooling PFC enhancers from ~30 individuals is sufficient to cover nearly all possible PFC enhancer regions, estimated at ~120,000.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe difference in similarity between PFC/TC and CB is consistent with previous reports and suggests potentially different cell-type composition in CB and cortex.
“This difference is consistent with previous reports and suggests potentially different cell-type composition in the CB and the cortex (33, 34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Sun W, Histone acetylome-wide association study of autism spectrum disorder. Cell 167, 1385– 1397.e11 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.031; pmid: 27863250 27863250 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Purves D, Neuroscience (Oxford Univ., ed. 6, 2018).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis estimate identified substantially more eQTLs and associated eGenes than previous studies, reflecting the large sample size.
“This estimate identified substantially more eQTLs and associated eGenes than previous studies, reflecting our large sample size (8, 11, 21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Battle A, Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550, 204– 213 (2017). doi: 10.1038/nature24277; pmid: 29022597 29022597 PMC5776756 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Fromer M, Gene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Nat. Neurosci 19, 1442– 1453 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nn.4399; pmid: 27668389 27668389 PMC5083142 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDeletion variants upstream of FZD9 had previously been associated with cell fraction changes related to Williams syndrome.
“deletion variants upstream of FZD9 had previously been associated with cell fraction changes related to Williams syndrome (40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Chailangkarn T, A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome. Nature 536, 338– 343 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nature19067; pmid: 27509850 27509850 PMC4995142 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLHX9 is critical for early cortical specification and SOX7 for neuronal apoptosis.
“These include LHX9 and SOX7, TFs critical for early cortical specification and neuronal apoptosis, respectively (48, 49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [48] Mangale VS, Lhx2 selector activity specifies cortical identity and suppresses hippocampal organizer fate. Science 319, 304– 309 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1151695; pmid: 18202285 18202285 PMC2494603 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] Wang C, SOX7 interferes with β-catenin activity to promote neuronal apoptosis. Eur. J. Neurosci 41, 1430– 1437 (2015). doi: 10.1111/ejn.12910; pmid: 25847511 25847511 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors kept their eQTL methods very standard, closely following the GTEx paradigm.
“In this study, we kept our eQTL methods very standard, closely following the GTEx paradigm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataAdditional data would be beneficial.
“Our best liability scores (from just the genotype at QTL-associated variants) are substantially below these bounds, implying that additional data would be beneficial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe authors expect the DSPN will improve accuracy mainly for complex traits with a highly polygenic architecture, but not necessarily for traits strongly determined by few variants or closely correlated with population structure.
“We expect that the DSPN will improve accuracy mainly for complex traits with a highly polygenic architecture, but not necessarily for traits that are strongly determined by only a few variants, such as Mendelian disorders, or are closely correlated with population structure, such as ethnicity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe transcriptome carries additional information, which the DSPN is able to extract.
“This result clearly manifests that the transcriptome carries additional information, which the DSPN is able to extract.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It is unclear how changes in cell proportions contribute to variation in tissue-level gene expression across a population.
“However, it is unclear how these changes in cell proportions can contribute to the variation in tissue-level gene expression observed across a population of individuals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
None of GTEx, ENCODE, and Roadmap focused on the human brain.
“However, none of these projects have focused their efforts on the human brain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many GWAS variants associated with neuropsychiatric disease lie in noncoding regions.
“Many of these variants lie in noncoding regions”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Elastic net regression assumes target gene expression is determined by a linear combination of expression levels of regulating TFs via regression coefficients.
“Elastic net regression assumes that target gene expression is determined by a linear combination of the expression levels of its regulating TFs, via regression coefficients (using sparsified L1 and L2 regularization).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.
“Brain tissue is composed of a variety of basic cell types.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The full interaction between genotype and phenotype involves many levels beyond those encapsulated by the regulatory network.
“The full interaction between genotype and phenotype involves many levels, beyond those encapsulated by the regulatory network.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The expression levels characterizing a signature are fairly constant over a population of cells of a given cell type.
“However, this assumes that the expression levels characterizing a signature are fairly constant over a population of cells of a given cell type.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional classification methods such as logistic regression predict phenotype directly from genotype, without using intermediates such as the transcriptome.
“Traditional classification methods such as logistic regression predict phenotype directly from genotype, without using intermediates such as the transcriptome (Fig. 7A).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cell type annotations were supported by expression patterns of curated marker genes.
“Annotations were supported by expression patterns of curated marker genes16,17 (Extended Data Fig. 1e; Supplementary Table S2).”
From APOE4 impairs myelination via cholesterol dysregulation in oligodendrocytes (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
In “Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell” (page not provided), the paper describes brain cell-type profiles and expression signatures comprising marker genes, and reports that biomarker-gene expression for the same cell type correlated across two data formats. Our copy does not say the marker genes were curated or that their expression patterns were used to support the cell-type annotations. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredmiR-QTLs were enriched in PsychEncode bulk prefrontal cortex enhancers (Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio = 1.32, 95% CI = [1.20,1.45], p = 1.3 × 10−8).
“miR-QTLs were enriched in this set of enhancers (Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio = 1.32, 95% CI = [1.20,1.45], p = 1.3 × 10−8)”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
The Enhancers section (page unavailable) identifies a reference set of 79,056 prefrontal cortex enhancers, supporting the identification of the enhancer set. The QTL analysis section discusses enrichment of other QTL types at genomic elements, but our copy does not report miR-QTL enrichment or the stated odds ratio, confidence interval, and p-value. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHeritability for all psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits was strongly enriched in neuronal enhancers and promoters, and much less so in PsychENCODE bulk brain enhancers.
“We found a strong enrichment of heritability for variants within neuronal enhancers and promoters for all psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits (Fig. 1D), which was substantially lower in PsychENCODE bulk brain enhancers (Fig. 1D) (13).”
From Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
Promoters of genes that mark a given cell type tended to show the matching H3K27ac profile.
“Promoters associated with cell type signature genes preferentially exhibited corresponding H3K27ac profiles”
From Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
The Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell section describes cell-type expression signatures and marker genes, while the Enhancers section describes H3K27ac profiles. Neither passage reports whether promoters of those marker genes preferentially exhibit H3K27ac profiles corresponding to the same cell type. I searched for the stated promoter–signature-gene relationship and cell-type-specific promoter acetylation; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNinety-four percent of bulk brain enhancers from PsychENCODE overlapped with enhancers found in the sorted nuclei.
“Most bulk brain enhancer regions identified by PsychENCODE overlapped with the nuclei cell type enhancers (94%) (13).”
From Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
The Enhancers section describes a reference set of 79,056 brain enhancers, but it does not report their overlap with enhancers from sorted nuclei. Searches for “94%,” “sorted nuclei enhancers,” and “cell type enhancers overlap bulk” found no passage establishing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
MAGMA assigns SNPs to nearest genes, which has the pitfall that non-coding SNPs can regulate distal genes via long-range (>10 kb) regulatory interactions.
“MAGMA assigns SNPs to the nearest genes, which has two major pitfalls. First, it is becoming increasingly recognized that non-coding SNPs can regulate distal genes via long range (>10 kb) regulatory interactions, whereby distal enhancers are brought into contact with the gene promoter3,4.”
From A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Using a DLPFC eQTL resource, 56% of intronic SNPs and 76% of intergenic SNPs did not show any association with nearest genes.
“we additionally used an eQTL resource from the human DLPFC3, from which we found 56% of intronic SNPs and 76% of intergenic SNPs did not show any association with nearest genes (Extended Data Fig. 1a, Methods).”
From A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Consistent with previous findings, a substantial overlap was detected between H-MAGMA and eQTL-based gene mapping tools.
“Consistent with the previous finding3,11, we detected a substantial overlap.”
From A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Exon-level chromatin interactions have gene regulatory potential.
“our previous study comparing Hi-C data with eQTLs have demonstrated the gene regulatory potential of exon-level interactions3”
From A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Coloc identified 255 schizophrenia-associated genes whose eQTLs co-localize with schizophrenia genome-wide significant loci.
“Coloc identified 255 SCZ-associated genes (coloc SCZ genes) whose eQTLs co-localize with SCZ genome-wide significant (GWS) loci (PP4>(PP0+PP1+PP2+PP3)).”
From A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Brain Hi-C data detected a direct interaction between the cross-disorder association region and NOX4 in adult and fetal brain (p = 3.2 × 10^-16 and 9.3 × 10^-6).
“Brain Hi-C data (Wang et al., 2018; Won et al., 2016) detected a direct interaction of the cross-disorder association region with NOX4 in both adult and fetal brain (interaction p = 3.2 3 10 16 and 9.3 3 10 6 , respectively).”
From Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2018
60 TWAS-prioritized genes overlapped with 321 high-confidence SCZ risk genes from the companion manuscript.
“Moreover, 60 TWAS prioritized genes overlapped with the list of 321 ‘high confidence’ SCZ risk genes identified in the companion manuscript (18), identified using gene regulatory networks and a deep learning approach (OR 34.7, p<10−60, Fisher’s exact test).”
From Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [18]
Of 61 disease-associated co-expression modules, 41 demonstrated cell type enrichments.
“It is notable that of these 61 co-expression modules with a disease-association, 41 demonstrate cell type enrichments, consistent with the strong cell type disease-related signal observed using both supervised and unsupervised methods in our companion paper (18).”
From Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [18]
Interpretable neural networks have been applied to determine how genotype governs brain phenotypes by embedding a regulatory network into a multilayer neural network model including intermediate phenotypes, gene groupings, and observed traits such as psychiatric disorders.
“The concept of interpretable neural networks has also been applied to determine how genotype governs brain phenotypes, by embedding a regulatory network into a multilayer neural network model including intermediate phenotypes (such as gene expression), gene groupings, and observed traits such as psychiatric disorders (Wang et al., 2018).”
From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2018
Cites
clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y., & He, Q.-Y. (2012) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118 · Cited by 36,259 · see citing works
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089 · see citing works
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051 · see citing works
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072 · see citing works
Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles
Newman, A. M., Liu, C. L., Green, M. R., Gentles, A. J., Feng, W., Xu, Y., Hoang, C. D., Diehn, M., & Alizadeh, A. A. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3337 · Cited by 12,116 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692 · see citing works
Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories
Wilson, P. W. F., D’Agostino, R. B., Levy, D., Belanger, A. M., Silbershatz, H., & Kannel, W. B. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837 · Cited by 9,581 · see citing works
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212 · see citing works
The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Weinstein, J. N., Collisson, E. A., Mills, G. B., Shaw, K. R. M., Ozenberger, B. A., Ellrott, K., Shmulevich, I., Sander, C., & Stuart, J. M. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2764 · Cited by 9,092 · see citing works
Shrestha, S., & Offer, S. M. (2016) · Medical Epigenetics · doi:10.1159/000444713 · Cited by 8,949 · see citing works
Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje, A., Meuleman, W., Ernst, J., Bilenky, M., Yen, A., Heravi-Moussavi, A., Kheradpour, P., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14248 · Cited by 6,368 · see citing works
Self-citationA General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2005) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1128 · Cited by 5,684 · see citing works
The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans
The GTEx Consortium, Ardlie, K. G., Deluca, D. S., Segrè, A. V., Sullivan, T. J., Young, T. R., Gelfand, E. T., Trowbridge, C. A., Maller, J. B., Tukiainen, T., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1262110 · Cited by 5,062 · see citing works
Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
The International Schizophrenia Consortium (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08185 · Cited by 4,821 · see citing works
GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions
McLean, C. Y., Bristor, D., Hiller, M., Clarke, S. L., Schaar, B. T., Lowe, C. B., Wenger, A. M., & Bejerano, G. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1630 · Cited by 4,502 · see citing works
Meta-Analysis of 74,046 Individuals Identifies 11 New Susceptibility Loci for Alzheimer’s Disease
(EADI), E. A. D. I., Lambert, J.-C., (GERAD), G. A. E. R. I. A. D., Alzheimer's Disease Genetic Consortium (ADGC), (CHARGE), C. F. H. A. A. R. I. G. E., Ibrahim-Verbaas, C. A., Harold, D., Naj, A. C., Sims, R., Bellenguez, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2802 · Cited by 4,336 · see citing works
Giambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383 · Cited by 4,261 · see citing works
FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L., & Noble, W. S. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 · Cited by 4,247 · see citing works
Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods
Das, S., Forer, L., Schönherr, S., Sidore, C., Locke, A. E., Kwong, A., Vrieze, S. I., Chew, E. Y., Levy, S., McGue, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3656 · Cited by 4,190 · see citing works
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues
GTEx Consortium (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24277 · Cited by 4,036 · see citing works
Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J., & Futreal, P. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07943 · Cited by 3,458 · see citing works
eQTLGen, Wray, N. R., 23andMe, the Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Ripke, S., Mattheisen, M., Trzaskowski, M., Byrne, E. M., Abdellaoui, A., Adams, M. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3 · Cited by 3,005 · see citing works
Self-citationModel of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems
Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00037.x · Cited by 2,768 · see citing works
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., & Kundaje, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.02685 · Cited by 2,761 · see citing works
Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
ReproGen Consortium, Finucane, H. K., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, The RACI Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Gusev, A., Trynka, G., Reshef, Y., Loh, P.-R., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3404 · Cited by 2,604 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, J. Z., van Sommeren, S., Huang, H., Ng, S. C., Alberts, R., Takahashi, A., Ripke, S., Lee, J. C., Jostins, L., Shah, T., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3359 · Cited by 2,603 · see citing works
Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for ADHD
(2017) · doi:10.1101/145581 · Cited by 2,203 · see citing works
Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization
Brunet, J.-P., Tamayo, P., Golub, T. R., & Mesirov, J. P. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308531101 · Cited by 2,183 · see citing works
Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain
Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Li, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10523 · Cited by 2,084 · see citing works
Self-citationAnalysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain
The Brainstorm Consortium, Anttila, V., Bulik-Sullivan, B., Finucane, H. K., Walters, R. K., Bras, J., Duncan, L., Escott-Price, V., Falcone, G. J., Gormley, P., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap8757 · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
Self-citationthe DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium, Morris, A. P., Voight, B. F., Teslovich, T. M., Ferreira, T., Segrè, A. V., Steinthorsdottir, V., Strawbridge, R. J., Khan, H., Grallert, H., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2383 · Cited by 1,912 · see citing works
Self-citationInternational Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), Nalls, M. A., Parkinson's Study Group (PSG) Parkinson's Research: The Organized GENetics Initiative (PROGENI), 23andMe, GenePD, NeuroGenetics Research Consortium (NGRC), Hussman Institute of Human Genomics (HIHG), Investigator, T. A. J. D., (CHARGE), C. F. H. A. A. R. I. G. E., North American Brain Expression Consortium (NABEC), et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3043 · Cited by 1,895 · see citing works
Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R
Langfelder, P., Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm563 · Cited by 1,892 · see citing works
Transcriptomic Analysis of Autistic Brain Reveals Convergent Molecular Pathology
Voineagu, I., Wang, X., Johnston, P., Lowe, J. K., Tian, Y., Horvath, S., Mill, J., Cantor, R. M., Blencowe, B. J., & Geschwind, D. H. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10110 · Cited by 1,874 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease
Cardiogenics, Schunkert, H., the CARDIoGRAM Consortium, König, I. R., Kathiresan, S., Reilly, M. P., Assimes, T. L., Holm, H., Preuss, M., Stewart, A. F. R., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.784 · Cited by 1,866 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. L., & Wills, Q. F. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777 · Cited by 1,852 · see citing works
Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity
Weirauch, M. T., Yang, A. W. H., Albu, M., Coté, A. G., Montenegro‐Montero, A., Drewe, P., Najafabadi, H. S., Lambert, S. A., Mann, I. K., Cook, K. B., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation
Dixon, J. R., Jung, I., Selvaraj, S., Shen, Y., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. E., Lee, A. Y., Ye, Z., Kim, A., Rajagopal, N., Xie, W., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14222 · Cited by 1,646 · see citing works
GERAD1 Consortium, Pardiñas, A. F., CRESTAR Consortium, Holmans, P., Pocklington, A. J., Escott-Price, V., Ripke, S., Carrera, N., Legge, S. E., Bishop, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Self-citationSavage, J. E., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., de Leeuw, C. A., Nagel, M., Awasthi, S., Barr, P. B., Coleman, J. R. I., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6 · Cited by 1,443 · see citing works
Self-citationA survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level
Darmanis, S., Sloan, S. A., Zhang, Y., Enge, M., Caneda, C., Shuer, L. M., Hayden Gephart, M. G., Barres, B. A., & Quake, S. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507125112 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
Prediction of lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease by risk factor burden at 50 years of age
Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Leip, E. P., Larson, M. G., D’Agostino, R. B., Beiser, A., Wilson, P. W. F., Wolf, P. A., & Levy, D. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.548206 · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment
Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A., Lee, J. J., Pers, T. H., Rietveld, C. A., Turley, P., Chen, G.-B., Emilsson, V., Meddens, S. F. W., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17671 · Cited by 1,297 · see citing works
Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder
Gandal, M. J., Zhang, P., Hadjimichael, E., Walker, R. L., Chen, C., Liu, S., Won, H., van Bakel, H., Varghese, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8127 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo genes encode distinct glutamate decarboxylases
Erlander, M. G., Tillakaratne, N. J. K., Feldblum, S., Patel, N., & Tobin, A. J. (1991) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(91)90077-d · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap
Gandal, M. J., Haney, J. R., Parikshak, N. N., Leppa, V., Ramaswami, G., Hartl, C., Schork, A. J., Appadurai, V., Buil, A., Werge, T. M., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad6469 · Cited by 1,095 · see citing works
Self-citationGene expression elucidates functional impact of polygenic risk for schizophrenia
Fromer, M., Roussos, P., Sieberts, S. K., Johnson, J. S., Kavanagh, D. H., Perumal, T. M., Ruderfer, D. M., Oh, E. C., Topol, A., Shah, H. R., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4399 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, H., Courtois, E. T., Sengupta, D., Tan, Y., Chen, K. H., Goh, J. J. L., Kong, S. L., Chua, C., Hon, L. K., Tan, W. S., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3818 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects
Marshall, C. R., Howrigan, D. P., Merico, D., Thiruvahindrapuram, B., Wu, W., Greer, D. S., Antaki, D., Shetty, A., Holmans, P. A., Pinto, D., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3725 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain
Lake, B. B., Chen, S., Sos, B. C., Fan, J., Kaeser, G. E., Yung, Y. C., Duong, T. E., Gao, D., Chun, J., Kharchenko, P. V., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4038 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
van Erp, T. G. M., Walton, E., Hibar, D. P., Schmaal, L., Jiang, W., Glahn, D. C., Pearlson, G. D., Yao, N., Fukunaga, M., Hashimoto, R., et al. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.04.023 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
On Consistency and Sparsity for Principal Components Analysis in High Dimensions
Johnstone, I. M., & Lu, A. Y. (2009) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.0121 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome
Schmitt, A. D., Hu, M., Jung, I., Xu, Z., Qiu, Y., Tan, C. L., Li, Y., Lin, S., Lin, Y., Barr, C. L., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.061 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges
Saliba, A.-E., Westermann, A. J., Gorski, S. A., & Vogel, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku555 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Advancing the understanding of autism disease mechanisms through genetics
de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Won, H., Stein, J. L., & Geschwind, D. H. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4071 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks
Li, M., Santpere, G., Imamura Kawasawa, Y., Evgrafov, O. V., Gulden, F. O., Pochareddy, S., Sunkin, S. M., Li, Z., Shin, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7615 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional organization of the transcriptome in human brain
Oldham, M. C., Konopka, G., Iwamoto, K., Langfelder, P., Kato, T., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2207 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman Ageing Genomic Resources: new and updated databases
Tacutu, R., Thornton, D., Johnson, E., Budovsky, A., Barardo, D., Craig, T., Diana, E., Lehmann, G., Toren, D., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1042 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
A large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system
Quail, M. A., Kozarewa, I., Smith, F., Scally, A., Stephens, P. J., Durbin, R. M., Swerdlow, H., & Turner, D. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1270 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Genome-wide changes in lncRNA, splicing, and regional gene expression patterns in autism
Parikshak, N. N., Swarup, V., Belgard, T. G., Irimia, M., Ramaswami, G., Gandal, M. J., Hartl, C., Leppa, V., Ubieta, L. D. L. T., Huang, J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20612 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Self-citationTemporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex
Colantuoni, C., Lipska, B. K., Ye, T., Hyde, T. M., Tao, R., Leek, J. T., Colantuoni, E. A., Elkahloun, A. G., Herman, M. M., Weinberger, D. R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10524 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Self-citationFode, C., Ma, Q., Casarosa, S., Ang, S.-L., Anderson, D. J., & Guillemot, F. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.1.67 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Prioritizing GWAS Results: A Review of Statistical Methods and Recommendations for Their Application
Cantor, R. M., Lange, K. L., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2010) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.017 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19847 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping DNA methylation across development, genotype and schizophrenia in the human frontal cortex
Jaffe, A. E., Gao, Y., Deep-Soboslay, A., Tao, R., Hyde, T. M., Weinberger, D. R., & Kleinman, J. E. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4181 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Self-citationStudy, S. S., Singh, T., Study, I., Study, D., UK10 K Consortium, Kurki, M. I., Curtis, D., Purcell, S. M., Crooks, L., McRae, J., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4267 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Self-citationAn xQTL map integrates the genetic architecture of the human brain's transcriptome and epigenome
Ng, B., White, C. C., Klein, H.-U., Sieberts, S. K., McCabe, C., Patrick, E., Xu, J., Yu, L., Gaiteri, C., Bennett, D. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4632 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Akbarian, S., Liu, C., Knowles, J. A., Vaccarino, F. M., Farnham, P. J., Crawford, G. E., Jaffe, A. E., Pinto, D., Dracheva, S., Geschwind, D. H., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4156 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Self-citationGenomewide Association Studies: History, Rationale, and Prospects for Psychiatric Disorders
Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Coordinating Committee (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08091354 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Genetics and genomics of psychiatric disease
Geschwind, D. H., & Flint, J. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8954 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Self-citationA voice region in the monkey brain
Petkov, C. I., Kayser, C., Steudel, T., Whittingstall, K., Augath, M. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2043 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Genetic Control of Individual Differences in Gene-Specific Methylation in Human Brain
Zhang, D., Cheng, L., Badner, J. A., Chen, C., Chen, Q., Luo, W., Craig, D. W., Redman, M., Gershon, E. S., & Liu, C. (2010) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.02.005 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Self-citationLiodis, P., Denaxa, M., Grigoriou, M., Akufo-Addo, C., Yanagawa, Y., & Pachnis, V. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3055-06.2007 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
A comprehensive transcriptional map of primate brain development
Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Ding, S., Sunkin, S. M., Smith, K. A., Ng, L., Szafer, A., Dalley, R. A., Royall, J. J., Lemon, T. A., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18637 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
A complete tool set for molecular QTL discovery and analysis
Delaneau, O., Ongen, H., Brown, A. A., Fort, A., Panousis, N. I., & Dermitzakis, E. T. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15452 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Extensive Variation in Chromatin States Across Humans
Kasowski, M., Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, S., Grubert, F., Zaugg, J. B., Kundaje, A., Liu, Y., Boyle, A. P., Zhang, Q. C., Zakharia, F., Spacek, D. V., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242510 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Pedersen, C. B., Bybjerg-Grauholm, J., Pedersen, M. G., Grove, J., Agerbo, E., Bækvad-Hansen, M., Poulsen, J. B., Hansen, C. S., McGrath, J. J., Als, T. D., et al. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.196 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Genetic Control of Chromatin States in Humans Involves Local and Distal Chromosomal Interactions
Grubert, F., Zaugg, J. B., Kasowski, M., Ursu, O., Spacek, D. V., Martin, A. R., Greenside, P., Srivas, R., Phanstiel, D. H., Pekowska, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.048 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Lhx2 Selector Activity Specifies Cortical Identity and Suppresses Hippocampal Organizer Fate
Mangale, V. S., Hirokawa, K. E., Satyaki, P. R. V., Gokulchandran, N., Chikbire, S., Subramanian, L., Shetty, A. S., Martynoga, B., Paul, J., Mai, M. V., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151695 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Histone Acetylome-wide Association Study of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Sun, W., Poschmann, J., Cruz-Herrera del Rosario, R., Parikshak, N. N., Hajan, H. S., Kumar, V., Ramasamy, R., Belgard, T. G., Elanggovan, B., Wong, C. C. Y., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.031 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Self-citationTranscriptome and epigenome landscape of human cortical development modeled in organoids
Amiri, A., Coppola, G., Scuderi, S., Wu, F., Roychowdhury, T., Liu, F., Pochareddy, S., Shin, Y., Safi, A., Song, L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat6720 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide characterization of mammalian promoters with distal enhancer functions
Dao, L. T. M., Galindo-Albarrán, A. O., Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Andrieu-Soler, C., Medina-Rivera, A., Souaid, C., Charbonnier, G., Griffon, A., Vanhille, L., Stephen, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3884 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Molecular and cellular reorganization of neural circuits in the human lineage
Sousa, A. M. M., Zhu, Y., Raghanti, M. A., Kitchen, R. R., Onorati, M., Tebbenkamp, A. T. N., Stutz, B., Meyer, K. A., Li, M., Kawasawa, Y. I., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3456 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationThe DLGAP family: neuronal expression, function and role in brain disorders
Rasmussen, A. H., Rasmussen, H. B., & Silahtaroglu, A. (2017) · Molecular Brain · doi:10.1186/s13041-017-0324-9 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptome sequencing: recent advances and remaining challenges
Liu, S., & Trapnell, C. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.7223.1 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationKessler, R. C., Avenevoli, S., Costello, E. J., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Heeringa, S. G., Merikangas, K. R., Pennell, B., Sampson, N. A., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2009) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.279 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Kelley, K. W., Nakao-Inoue, H., Molofsky, A. V., & Oldham, M. C. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0216-z · Cited by 198 · see citing works
A human neurodevelopmental model for Williams syndrome
Chailangkarn, T., Trujillo, C. A., Freitas, B. C., Hrvoj-Mihic, B., Herai, R. H., Yu, D. X., Brown, T. T., Marchetto, M. C., Bardy, C., McHenry, L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19067 · Cited by 195 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Perhaps connected to this, deletion variants upstream of FZD9 had previously been associated with cell fraction changes related to Williams syndrome (40).”
BackgroundEndophenotypes in psychiatric genetics
Walters, J., & Owen, M. J. (2007) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4002068 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Evaluation of chromatin accessibility in prefrontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia
Bryois, J., Garrett, M. E., Song, L., Safi, A., Giusti-Rodriguez, P., Johnson, G. D., Shieh, A. W., Buil, A., Fullard, J. F., Roussos, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05379-y · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationJaffe, A. E., Shin, J., Collado-Torres, L., Leek, J. T., Tao, R., Li, C., Gao, Y., Jia, Y., Maher, B. J., Hyde, T. M., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3898 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Dijk, D., Nainys, J., Sharma, R., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/111591 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Functional assessment of human enhancer activities using whole-genome STARR-sequencing
Liu, Y., Yu, S., Dhiman, V. K., Brunetti, T., Eckart, H., & White, K. P. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1345-5 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure of the nuclear exosome captured on a maturing preribosome
Schuller, J. M., Falk, S., Fromm, L., Hurt, E., & Conti, E. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar5428 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machines for Structured Output PredictionPreprint
Mnih, V., Larochelle, H., & Hinton, G. E. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.3748 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
HiC-spector: a matrix library for spectral and reproducibility analysis of Hi-C contact maps
Yan, K., Yardımcı, G. G., Yan, C., Noble, W. S., & Gerstein, M. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx152 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationExpression Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping With Multivariate Sparse Partial Least Squares Regression
Chun, H., & Keleş, S. (2009) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.100362 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Bearden, C. E., & Thompson, P. M. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.033 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Sensitive detection of chromatin-altering polymorphisms reveals autoimmune disease mechanisms
del Rosario, R. C.-H., Poschmann, J., Rouam, S. L., Png, E., Khor, C. C., Hibberd, M. L., & Prabhakar, S. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3326 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Kundaković, M., Jiang, Y. P., Kavanagh, D. H., Dincer, A., Brown, L. M., Pothula, V., Zharovsky, E., Park, R., Jacobov, R., Magro, I. L., et al. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.03.1048 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, H., Shang, X., & Zhu, H. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw818 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
McKinney, B. C., Lin, C.-W., Oh, H., Tseng, G. C., Lewis, D. A., & Sibille, E. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.107 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Integrated Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Multivariate eQTL Mapping
Scott‐Boyer, M., Imholte, G., Tayeb, A., et al. (2012) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1515/1544-6115.1760 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
<scp>SOX</scp>7 interferes with β‐catenin activity to promote neuronal apoptosis
Wang, C., Qin, L., Min, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhu, L., Zhu, J., & Yu, S. (2015) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12910 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Evgrafov, O. V., Armoskus, C., Wrobel, B. B., Spitsyna, V. N., Souaiaia, T., Herstein, J. S., Walker, C. P., Nguyen, J. D., Camarena, A., Weitz, J. R., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1101/209197 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, A. P. (1879) · Nature · doi:10.1038/019483a0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Births and Deaths in the Civil Population of France in the War-Time
Kellogg, V. L. (1919) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.50.1291.304 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- D. Purves Neuroscience (Oxford Univ. ed. 6 2018).
- R. Salakhutdinov G. Hinton “Deep Boltzmann machines ” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat. 5 448–455 (2009).
- K. Simonyan Ph.D. dissertation University of Oxford (2013).
- J. Grove S. Ripke T. Damm Als M. Mattheisen R. Walters H. Won J. Pallesen E. Agerbo O. A. Andreassen R. Anney R. Belliveau F. Bettella J. D. Buxbaum J. Bybjerg-Grauholm M. Bækved-Hansen F. Cerrato K. Chambert J. H. Christensen C. Churchhouse K. Dellenvall D. Demontis S. De Rubeis B. Devlin S. Djurovic A. Dumont J. Goldstein C. S. Hansen M. E. Hauberg M. V. Hollegaard S. Hope D. P. Howrigan H. Huang C. Hultman L. Klei J. Maller J. Martin A. R. Martin J. Moran M. Nyegaard T. Nærland D. S. Palmer A. Palotie C. B. Pedersen M. G. Pedersen T. Poterba J. B. Poulsen B. St. Pourcain P. Qvist K. Rehnström A. Reichenberg J. Reichert E. Robinson K. Roeder P. Roussos E. Saemundsen S. Sandin F. K. Satterstrom G. D. Smith H. Stefansson K. Stefansson S. Steinberg C. Stevens P. F. Sullivan P. Turley G. B. Walters X. Xu ASD Working Group of the PGC BUPGEN Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the PGC 23andMe Research Team D. Geschwind M. Nordentoft D. M. Hougaard T. Werge O. Mors P. B. Mortensen B. M. Neale M. J. Daly A. D. Børglum Common risk variants identified in autism spectrum disorder. bioRxiv 224774 [Preprint]. 27 November 2017. .10.1101/224774 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia
Trubetskoy, V., Pardiñas, A. F., Qi, T., Panagiotaropoulou, G., Awasthi, S., Bigdeli, T. B., Bryois, J., Chen, C.-Y., Dennison, C. A., Hall, L. S., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04434-5 · Cited by 2,964 · see citing works
Self-citationVõsa, U., Claringbould, A., Westra, H.-J., Bonder, M. J., Deelen, P., Zeng, B., Kirsten, H., Saha, A., Kreuzhuber, R., Yazar, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00913-z · Cited by 2,607 · see citing works
Self-citationGenomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders
Lee, P. H., Anttila, V., Won, H., Feng, Y.-C. A., Rosenthal, J., Zhu, Z., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Nivard, M. G., Grotzinger, A. D., Posthuma, D., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.020 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
“We used an array of functional genomics resources, including brain eQTL and Hi-C data (Wang et al., 2018; Won et al., 2016) to prioritize potential candidate genes to the identi-fied regions (STAR Methods; Figure 2B).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTranscriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder
Gandal, M. J., Zhang, P., Hadjimichael, E., Walker, R. L., Chen, C., Liu, S., Won, H., van Bakel, H., Varghese, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8127 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Self-citationWightman, D. P., Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Shadrin, A. A., Bahrami, S., Holland, D., Rongve, A., Børte, S., Winsvold, B. S., Drange, O. K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00921-z · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Self-citationThe genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex
Grasby, K. L., Jahanshad, N., Painter, J. N., Colodro-Conde, L., Bralten, J., Hibar, D. P., Lind, P. A., Pizzagalli, F., Ching, C. R. K., McMahon, M. A. B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay6690 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks
Li, M., Santpere, G., Imamura Kawasawa, Y., Evgrafov, O. V., Gulden, F. O., Pochareddy, S., Sunkin, S. M., Li, Z., Shin, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7615 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association
Nott, A., Holtman, I. R., Coufal, N. G., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Yu, M., Hu, R., Han, C. Z., Pena, M., Xiao, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay0793 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Defining the genetic, genomic, cellular, and diagnostic architectures of psychiatric disorders
Sullivan, P. F., & Geschwind, D. H. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.015 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Self-citationChia, R., Sabir, M. S., Bandres-Ciga, S., Saez-Atienzar, S., Reynolds, R. H., Gustavsson, E., Walton, R. L., Ahmed, S., Viollet, C., Ding, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00785-3 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Self-citationAPOE4 impairs myelination via cholesterol dysregulation in oligodendrocytes
Blanchard, J. W., Akay, L. A., Davila-Velderrain, J., von Maydell, D., Mathys, H., Davidson, S. M., Effenberger, A., Chen, C.-Y., Maner-Smith, K., Hajjar, I., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05439-w · Cited by 493 · see citing works
“Annotations were supported by expression patterns of curated marker genes 16,17 (Extended Data Fig.”
Self-citationDeep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review
Su, C., Xu, Z., Pathak, J., & Wang, F. (2020) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-020-0780-3 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Karlsson Linnér, R., Mallard, T. T., Barr, P. B., Sanchez-Roige, S., Madole, J. W., Driver, M. N., Poore, H. E., de Vlaming, R., Grotzinger, A. D., Tielbeek, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00908-3 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Self-citationSey, N. Y. A., Hu, B., Mah, W., Fauni, H., McAfee, J. C., Rajarajan, P., Brennand, K. J., Akbarian, S., & Won, H. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0603-0 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationTau Activation of Microglial cGAS–IFN Reduces MEF2C‐mediated Cognitive Resilience
Udeochu, J. C., Amin, S., Huang, Y., Fan, L., Torres, E. R. S., Carling, G. K., Liu, B., McGurran, H., Coronas-Samano, G., Kauwe, G., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01315-6 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Biological embedding of experience: a primer on epigenetics
Aristizabal, M. J., Anreiter, I., Halldorsdottir, T., Odgers, C. L., McDade, T. W., Goldenberg, A., Mostafavi, S., Kobor, M. S., Binder, E. B., Sokolowski, M. B., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820838116 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
de Klein, N., Tsai, E. A., Vochteloo, M., Baird, D., Huang, Y., Chen, C.-Y., van Dam, S., Oelen, R., Deelen, P., Bakker, O. B., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01300-6 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes
Armand, E. J., Li, J., Xie, F., Luo, C., & Mukamel, E. A. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.010 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Quantum computing at the frontiers of biological sciences
Emani, P. S., Warrell, J., Anticevic, A., Bekiranov, S., Gandal, M., McConnell, M. J., Sapiro, G., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Baker, J. T., Bastiani, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01004-3 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationSayed, F. A., Kodama, L., Fan, L., Carling, G. K., Udeochu, J. C., Le, D., Li, Q., Zhou, L., Wong, M. Y., Horowitz, R., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abe3947 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationWalker, K. A., Chen, J., Shi, L., Yang, Y., Fornage, M., Zhou, L., Schlosser, P., Surapaneni, A., Grams, M. E., Duggan, M. R., et al. (2023) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adf5681 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationFortelny, N., & Bock, C. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02100-5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Ramaswami, G., Won, H., Gandal, M. J., Haney, J., Wang, J. C., Wong, C. C. Y., Sun, W., Prabhakar, S., Mill, J., & Geschwind, D. H. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18526-1 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic determinants of survival in progressive supranuclear palsy: a genome-wide association study
Jabbari, E., Koga, S., Valentino, R. R., Reynolds, R. H., Ferrari, R., Tan, M. M. X., Rowe, J. B., Dalgard, C. L., Scholz, S. W., Dickson, D. W., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30394-x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders
Hu, B., Won, H., Mah, W., Park, R. B., Kassim, B., Spiess, K., Kozlenkov, A., Crowley, C. A., Pochareddy, S., The PsychENCODE Consortium, et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24243-0 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationImaging transcriptomics of brain disorders
Arnatkeviciute, A., Fulcher, B. D., Bellgrove, M. A., & Fornito, A. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.10.002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Li, Z., Farias, F. H. G., Dube, U., Del-Aguila, J. L., Mihindukulasuriya, K. A., Fernandez, M. V., Ibanez, L., Budde, J. P., Wang, F., Lake, A. M., et al. (2020) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-019-02066-0 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping the multiscale structure of biological systems
Schaffer, L. V., & Ideker, T. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.012 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Review of multi-omics data resources and integrative analysis for human brain disorders
Dong, X., Liu, C., & Dozmorov, M. (2021) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elab024 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationConsens, M. E., Chen, Y., Menon, V., Wang, Y., Schneider, J. A., De Jager, P. L., Bennett, D. A., Tripathy, S. J., & Felsky, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.903175 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationMah, W., & Won, H. (2020) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2019.03.007 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationChandrashekar, P. B., Alatkar, S., Wang, J., Hoffman, G. E., He, C., Jin, T., Khullar, S., Bendl, J., Fullard, J. F., Roussos, P., et al. (2023) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-023-01248-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationFIREcaller: Detecting frequently interacting regions from Hi-C data
Crowley, C., Yang, Y., Qiu, Y., Hu, B., Abnousi, A., Lipiński, J., Plewczyński, D., Wu, D., Won, H., Ren, B., et al. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.12.026 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationMicali, N., Kim, S.-K., Diaz-Bustamante, M., Stein-O’Brien, G., Seo, S., Shin, J.-H., Rash, B. G., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Olivares, N. A., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107599 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence for dementia genetics and omics
Bettencourt, C., Skene, N., Bandres‐Ciga, S., Anderson, E., Winchester, L. M., Foote, I. F., Schwartzentruber, J., Botia, J. A., Nalls, M., Singleton, A., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13427 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Vattathil, S. M., Gerasimov, E. S., Canon, S. M., Lori, A., Tan, S. S. M., Kim, P. J., Liu, Y., Lai, E. C., Bennett, D. A., Wingo, T. S., et al. (2024) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-024-00778-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
EADB, Bellenguez, C., Castillo Morales, A., Amin, N., van der Lee, S. J., Muntaner, M., Parveen, K., Küçükali, F., Grenier-Boley, B., Heikkinen, S., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02583-1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wang, D., Liu, S., Warrell, J., Won, H., Shi, X., Navarro, F. C. P., Clarke, D., Gu, M., Emani, P., Yang, Y. T., Xu, M., Gandal, M. J., Lou, S., Zhang, J., Park, J. J., Yan, C., Rhie, S. K., Manakongtreecheep, K., Zhou, H., Nathan, A., Peters, M., Mattei, E., Fitzgerald, D., Brunetti, T., Moore, J., Jiang, Y., Girdhar, K., Hoffman, G. E., Kalayci, S., Gümüş, Z. H., Crawford, G. E., PsychENCODE Consortium, Roussos, P., Akbarian, S., Jaffe, A. E., White, K. P., Weng, Z., Sestan, N., Geschwind, D. H., Knowles, J. A., Gerstein, M. B., Ashley-Koch, A. E., Crawford, G. E., Garrett, M. E., Song, L., Safi, A., Johnson, G. D., Wray, G. A., Reddy, T. E., Goes, F. S., Zandi, P., Bryois, J., Jaffe, A. E., Price, A. J., Ivanov, N. A., Collado-Torres, L., Hyde, T. M., Burke, E. E., Kleiman, J. E., Tao, R., Shin, J. H., Akbarian, S., Girdhar, K., Jiang, Y., Kundakovic, M., Brown, L., Kassim, B. S., Park, R. B., Wiseman, J. R., Zharovsky, E., Jacobov, R., Devillers, O., Flatow, E., Hoffman, G. E., Lipska, B. K., Lewis, D. A., Haroutunian, V., Hahn, C.-G., Charney, A. W., Dracheva, S., Kozlenkov, A., Belmont, J., DelValle, D., Francoeur, N., Hadjimichael, E., Pinto, D., van Bakel, H., Roussos, P., Fullard, J. F., Bendl, J., Hauberg, M. E., Mangravite, L. M., Peters, M. A., Chae, Y., Peng, J., Niu, M., Wang, X., Webster, M. J., Beach, T. G., Chen, C., Jiang, Y., Dai, R., Shieh, A. W., Liu, C., Grennan, K. S., Xia, Y., Vadukapuram, R., Wang, Y., Fitzgerald, D., Cheng, L., Brown, M., Brown, M., Brunetti, T., Goodman, T., Alsayed, M., Gandal, M. J., Geschwind, D. H., Won, H., Polioudakis, D., Wamsley, B., Yin, J., Hadzic, T., De La Torre Ubieta, L., Swarup, V., Sanders, S. J., State, M. W., Werling, D. M., An, J.-Y., Sheppard, B., Willsey, A. J., White, K. P., Ray, M., Giase, G., Kefi, A., Mattei, E., Purcaro, M., Weng, Z., Moore, J., Pratt, H., Huey, J., Borrman, T., Sullivan, P. F., Giusti-Rodriguez, P., Kim, Y., Sullivan, P., Szatkiewicz, J., Rhie, S. K., Armoskus, C., Camarena, A., Farnham, P. J., Spitsyna, V. N., Witt, H., Schreiner, S., Evgrafov, O. V., Knowles, J. A., Gerstein, M., Liu, S., Wang, D., Navarro, F. C. P., Warrell, J., Clarke, D., Emani, P. S., Gu, M., Shi, X., Xu, M., Yang, Y. T., Kitchen, R. R., Gürsoy, G., Zhang, J., Carlyle, B. C., Nairn, A. C., Li, M., Pochareddy, S., Sestan, N., Skarica, M., Li, Z., Sousa, A. M. M., Santpere, G., Choi, J., Zhu, Y., Gao, T., Miller, D. J., Cherskov, A., Yang, M., Amiri, A., Coppola, G., Mariani, J., Scuderi, S., Szekely, A., Vaccarino, F. M., Wu, F., Weissman, S., Roychowdhury, T., & Abyzov, A.
- Affiliations
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
- Yale University (US)
- Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
- Duke University (US)
- Sage Bionetworks (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- Emani, Prashant
- Lou, Shaoke
- Park, Jonathan J.
- Yan, Chengfei
- Manakongtreecheep, Kasidet
- Zhou, Holly
- Nathan, Aparna
- Kalayci, Selim
- Gümüş, Zeynep H.
- Gerstein, Mark B.
- Song, Lingyun
- Safi, Alexias
- Johnson, Graham D.
- Wray, Gregory A.
- Reddy, Timothy E
- Goes, Fernando S.
- Zandi, Peter
- Bryois, Julien
- Price, Amanda J.
- Ivanov, Nikolay A.
- Hyde, Thomas M.
- Tao, Ran
- Shin, Joo Heon
- Park, Royce B.
- Wiseman, Jennifer R
- Zharovsky, Elizabeth
- Lewis, David A.
- Haroutunian, Vahram
- Charney, Alexander W.
- Dracheva, Stella
- Kozlenkov, Alexey
- Francoeur, Nancy
- Hadjimichael, Evi
- Pinto, Dalila
- Fullard, John F.
- Bendl, Jaroslav
- Hauberg, Mads E.
- Mangravite, Lara M
- Peng, Junmin
- Wang, Xusheng
- Webster, Maree J.
- Chen, Chao
- Jiang, Yi
- Dai, Rujia
- Shieh, Annie W.
- Liu, Chunyu
- Xia, Yan
- Wang, Yongjun
- Cheng, Lijun
- Brown, Miguel
- Wamsley, Brie
- Yin, Jiani
- Swarup, Vivek
- Sanders, Stephan J.
- State, Matthew W.
- Werling, Donna M.
- An, Joon-Yong
- Sheppard, Brooke
- Willsey, A. Jeremy
- Giase, Gina
- Kefi, Amira
- Purcaro, Michael
- Pratt, Henry
- Huey, Jack
- Borrman, Tyler
- Kim, Yunjung
- Szatkiewicz, Jin
- Camarena, Adrian
- Farnham, Peggy J.
- Spitsyna, Valeria N.
- Witt, Heather
- Schreiner, Shannon
- Evgrafov, Oleg V.
- Kitchen, Robert R.
- Gürsoy, Gamze
- Carlyle, Becky C.
- Nairn, Angus C.
- Li, Mingfeng
- Pochareddy, Sirisha
- Li, Zhen
- Santpere, Gabriel
- Choi, Jinmyung
- Zhu, Ying
- Gao, Tianliuyun
- Miller, Daniel J.
- Cherskov, Adriana
- Yang, Mo
- Amiri, Anahita
- Coppola, Gianfilippo
- Mariani, Jessica
- Scuderi, Soraya
- Szekely, Anna
- Vaccarino, Flora M.
- Wu, Feinan
- Roychowdhury, Tanmoy
- Abyzov, Alexej
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2018-12-14
- Volume
- 362
- Issue
- 6420
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC6413328
- OpenAlex
- W2904763455
- Semantic Scholar
- 4e256382e2064492e75427c83911feac91758671
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 34.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH094714, R01 MH110927, R01 MH105472)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- PsychENCODE, mental illness, gene regulatory networks, expression quantitative trait loci, topologically associating domains, chromatin looping, brain cell types, schizophrenia, polygenic risk prediction, brain aging, enhancers, single-cell transcriptomics, chromatin accessibility, disease prediction model, brain-expressed genes, gene co-expression modules
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Mental Disorders, Brain, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Quantitative Trait Loci, Epigenesis, Genetic, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genome-Wide Association Study, Epigenomics, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review