Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation
Open accessAbstract
In mammals, DNA methylation occurs mainly at CpG dinucleotides. Methylation of the promoter suppresses gene expression, but the functional role of gene-body DNA methylation in highly expressed genes has yet to be clarified. Here we show that, in mouse embryonic stem cells, Dnmt3b-dependent intragenic DNA methylation protects the gene body from spurious RNA polymerase II entry and cryptic transcription initiation. Using different genome-wide approaches, we demonstrate that this Dnmt3b function is dependent on its enzymatic activity and recruitment to the gene body by H3K36me3. Furthermore, the spurious transcripts can either be degraded by the RNA exosome complex or capped, polyadenylated, and delivered to the ribosome to produce aberrant proteins. Elongating RNA polymerase II therefore triggers an epigenetic crosstalk mechanism that involves SetD2, H3K36me3, Dnmt3b and DNA methylation to ensure the fidelity of gene transcription initiation, with implications for intragenic hypomethylation in cancer.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Dnmt3b-mediated DNA methylation within gene bodies, recruited via H3K36me3, suppresses spurious intragenic RNA polymerase II entry and cryptic transcription initiation in mouse embryonic stem cells. The resulting aberrant transcripts can be degraded by the RNA exosome or capped, polyadenylated, exported, and ribosome-associated, with possible relevance to intragenic hypomethylation in cancer.
Key findings
- Dnmt3b knockout reduced gene-body 5-methylcytosine, especially on exons and introns, and increased intragenic transcription: 1,445 genes (18% of genes with RPKM > 1) showed an intermediate-exon/first-exon log2 ratio above 1.
- DECAP-seq identified 2,627 high-expression intragenic transcription start sites (RPM > 6) specific to Dnmt3b−/− cells, versus 780 shared and 936 WT-specific sites; Dnmt3b−/−-specific sites accounted for 2.76% of mapped reads, while shared sites accounted for 5.22%.
- SetD2 silencing reduced H3K36me3 and Dnmt3b gene-body binding and produced 3,560 high-confidence intragenic TSSs, of which 2,759 were specific to the knockdown and more than 2,000 overlapped with Dnmt3b−/− sites.
- Rescue experiments showed that wild-type Dnmt3b, but not the catalytically inactive V725G mutant or H3K36me3-binding mutants S277P and VW-RR, reduced the intermediate/first-exon ratio; cryptic RNAs were partly degraded by the RNA exosome, partly polyadenylated, and showed increased ribosome occupancy in intronic regions.
Methods
- Mouse E14 embryonic stem cells were used, with two independent Dnmt3b knockout lines generated by TALEN targeting of exon 17; SetD2, Dis3, and Rrp6 were silenced by shRNA, and Dnmt3b rescue used wild-type or mutant constructs.
- Genome-wide assays included ChIP-seq for Dnmt3b, RNA Pol II, H3K36me3, and other marks; whole-genome bisulfite sequencing; total, polyA+, and cytoplasmic RNA-seq; CAPIP-seq; DECAP-seq for single-base TSS mapping; and ART-seq ribosome profiling.
- Analyses mapped reads to an E14-specific mm9 variant and used TopHat/Cuffdiff, Bowtie, BSMAP, MACS, and custom scripts, with significance assessed by Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, hypergeometric, and correlation tests.
Limitations
- The paper has no dedicated limitations section; it notes that alternative splicing and repetitive-element activation events in Dnmt3b−/− cells were sporadic, with only 4 of 2,563 genes showing intragenic alternative-promoter reactivation.
- The cancer relevance is discussed as an implication rather than tested directly, and the production of aberrant proteins from cryptic transcripts is suggested by ribosome profiling rather than demonstrated.
- Evident from the text: the work is restricted to mouse ESCs and relies heavily on knockout/knockdown and overexpression systems, so the findings may not generalize to other cell types or in vivo tumor settings.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In DRB-treated cells, Dnmt3b-/- cells show a significant increase of RNA Pol II binding on intragenic regions compared with WT, especially on introns and exons of q3-q4 genes, using both pan and Ser5 antibodies.
“In contrast, we observed a significant increase of RNA Pol II binding on intragenic regions when comparing Dnmt3b -/-to WT cells treated with DRB.This was especially true on introns and exons of q3-q4 genes using both antibodies (Fig. 2c, d and Extended Data Fig. 4f)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dnmt3b-/- cells have a significantly higher ratio of intermediate exon RPKM to first exon RPKM starting from the second exon.
“Dnmt3b -/- cells displayed a significantly higher ratio starting from the second exon (Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Untreated Dnmt3b-/- cells show no significant changes in H3K36me3 and RNA Pol II genomic profiles compared with WT cells.
“We did not observe any significant changes in H3K36me3 and RNA Pol II genomic profiles when comparing untreated WT to Dnmt3b -/-cells (Fig. 2c, d and Extended Data Fig. 4d-f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Dnmt3b-/- cells, 1445 genes, representing 18% of genes with RPKM greater than 1, had a log2 ratio of intermediate exons versus first exon greater than 1.
“1445 genes (18% of total genes having RPKM > 1) had a log2 ratio of intermediate exons versus first exon > 1 (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dnmt3b loss does not cause general genome-wide reactivation of alternative promoters.
“Even though some alternative promoters' reactivation events take place in Dnmt3b -/-cells, the Dnmt3b loss did not show evidence of a general reactivation of these events at genome-wide level (Extended Data Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
CAPIP-seq showed significant enrichment of CAP signal in intermediate intronic and exonic regions of Dnmt3b-/- transcripts.
“Application of this technique to total RNA, showed a significant enrichment of CAP signal in intermediate intronic and exonic regions of Dnmt3b -/-transcripts (Extended Data Fig. 5f-g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DECAP-seq revealed a significant increase of transcription start sites in Dnmt3b-/- cells compared with WT on gene bodies of q3 and q4 genes.
“DECAP-seq analysis in WT and Dnmt3b -/-cells revealed a significant increase of the transcription start sites (TSSs) in Dnmt3b -/-cells with respect to WT cells on the gene bodies of the q3 and q4 genes (Fig. 3a, b and Extended Data Fig. 6f, g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intron half-life is generally shorter than mRNA half-life.
“Introns half-life is generally lower with respect to the mRNAs half-life,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within 50 bp centered on Dnmt3b-dependent intragenic TSSs, there is statistically significant enrichment of CpG dinucleotide and several CpG-containing transcription factor binding motifs, including SP1 and ETS family members.
“Interestingly, within a region of 50 bp centred at the Dnmt3bdependent intragenic TSSs, we found a statistically significant enrichment of the CpG dinucleotide and several transcription factor binding motifs containing CpG sequence, including SP1 and members of the ETS family (Fig. 3g, h and Extended data Fig. 7a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intronic RNA inclusion in Dnmt3b-/- cells remained higher than in WT cells along the DRB time course.
“The intronic RNA inclusion in Dnmt3b -/-cells remained always higher than in WT cells along the time course (Fig. 5f)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dnmt3b and H3K36me3 show nearly the same distribution across genes grouped by expression quartile.
“Plots of Dnmt3b and H3K36me3 distribution on genes clustered in quartiles of expression revealing an almost identical distribution for both features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No putative intragenic promoter from the second through the twelfth showed general activation in Dnmt3b -/- cells.
“none of putative intragenic promoters (from the 2 nd to the 12 th ) showed general activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loss of Dnmt3b does not broadly activate alternative promoters.
“Extended Data Figure 3: Dnmt3b loss does not extensively affect alternative promoter activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intronic RNA half-life slightly increased in Dnmt3b-/- cells.
“and the intronic RNA half-life slightly increased in Dnmt3b -/-cells (Extended Data Fig. 11d, f)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PolyA+ and cytosolic DECAP-seq found significantly fewer intragenic TSSs than DECAP-seq from total RNA.
“We found a significant reduced number of intragenic TSSs in PolyA+ and cytosolic DECAP-seq with respect to DECAP-seq starting from total RNA (Extended Data Fig. 10p, q)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Transfection of Dnmt3b WT, but not mutant, into Dnmt3b -/- embryonic stem cells significantly increases DNA methylation at intragenic regions.
“An intragenic significant increase of DNA methylation has been observed in Dnmt3b WT (but not mutant) transfected Dnmt3b -/-ESCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SetD2 silencing increases the intermediate/first exon ratio to an extent comparable to that in Dnmt3b-/- versus WT cells.
“The intermediate/first exon ratio in SetD2 silenced with respect to the control cells estimated by total RNA-seq showed an increase of spurious transcripts that was comparable to the increase measured in Dnmt3b -/-versus WT cells (Fig. 4d, e and Extended Data Fig. 8 g, h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DECAP-seq revealed a significant increase of TSSs in SetD2-silenced cells compared with control on gene bodies of q3 and q4 genes.
“DECAP-seq revealed a significant increase of TSSs in SetD2 silenced cells with respect to control cells on the gene bodies of the transcripts belonging to the genes q3 and q4 (Extended Data Fig. 8i-k).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The intermediates/first exon ratio was higher in Dnmt3b-/- than WT cells at all DRB time points.
“Moreover, the intermediates/first exon ratio was higher in Dnmt3b -/-with respect to WT cells at all time points of DRB treatment (Fig. 5g, h)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dnmt3b-/- cells show a significant reduction of ribosome occupancy on the 5'-UTR.
“Active mRNA Translation sequencing (ART-seq) revealed that Dnmt3b -/-cells displayed a significant reduction of the ribosome occupancy on the 5'-UTR region”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dnmt3b -/- cells tend to express the first exon of genes less, regardless of which isoform is considered.
“We observed that the Dnmt3b -/-cells showed a general trend to have genes with the first exon less expressed independently from the isoform”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant changes in ribosome enrichment of the coding region were observed between WT and Dnmt3b-/- cells.
“while we did not observe significant changes in the ribosome enrichment of the coding region of the transcripts between WT and Dnmt3b -/-cells (Fig. 5i and Extended Data Fig. 11j).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among 2,563 genes with at least two annotated alternative promoters, only four showed intragenic promoter reactivation in Dnmt3b -/- cells.
“Analysis of the ratio of the expression between the 1 st promoter and the 2 nd downstream promoter identified 4 genes (on a total of 2563 genes) with a reactivation of the intragenic promoter in Dnmt3b -/-cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Whole transcriptome half-life did not show any significant difference between WT and Dnmt3b-/- cells.
“whereas the whole transcriptome half-life did not show any significant difference between WT and Dnmt3b -/-cells (Extended Data Fig. 11c, e, g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PolyA+ RNA-seq showed an increase of the intermediate/first exon ratio in Dnmt3b-/- cells.
“Although analysis of the polyA+ transcripts by RNA-seq (Extended Data Fig. 10l, m) showed an increase of the intermediate/first exon ratio in Dnmt3b -/-cells (Fig. 5a, b and Extended Data Fig. 10n, o)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dnmt3b-/- cells show a marked increase in ribosome occupancy of RNA intronic regions, especially on q3-q4 genes.
“together with a marked increase in the occupancy of RNA intronic regions, especially on q3-q4 genes (Fig. 5i, j and Extended Data Fig. 11j, k)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Dnmt3b is necessary to prevent intragenic spurious transcription initiation by repressing RNA Pol II entry downstream of canonical promoters.
“These data strongly support the hypothesis that Dnmt3b is necessary to prevent intragenic spurious transcription initiation by repressing RNA Pol II entry downstream the canonical promoters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Elongating RNA Pol II triggers an epigenetic crosstalk involving SetD2, H3K36me3, Dnmt3b, and DNA methylation that ensures fidelity of transcription initiation.
“Thus, elongating RNA Polymerase II triggers an epigenetic crosstalk that involves SetD2, H3K36me3, Dnmt3b, and DNA methylation to ensure gene transcription initiation fidelity with implications for intragenic hypomethylation in cancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In Dnmt3b-/- cells, a significant amount of RNA is transcribed starting within the gene body.
“This indicates that in Dnmt3b -/-cells, a significant amount of RNAs are transcribed starting within the gene body.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The specificity of RppH treatment for mapping capped 5' ends was validated by comparing RppH-treated RNA with untreated or PNK-treated RNA.
“We validated the specificity of this technique in a pilot experiment by comparing RppH treated RNA versus untreated or T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) treated RNA (Extended Data Fig. 6a-e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Dnmt3b-mediated inhibition of spurious transcription initiation depends on the presence of H3K36me3.
“Thus, Dnmt3bmediated inhibition of spurious transcription initiation is dependent on the presence of H3K36me3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Loss of Dnmt3b produces partial intragenic starting RNAs that have stability comparable to canonical mRNAs.
“Extended Data Figure 11: Loss of Dnmt3b generates partial intragenic starting RNAs that are as stable as canonical mRNAs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The increase in spurious RNA Pol II entry and the resulting cryptic RNAs might generate aberrant proteins.
“Thus, suggesting that the increment of RNA Pol II spurious entry and consequent transcription of cryptic RNAs might generate aberrant proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cryptic RNA transcripts are partly degraded by the RNA exosome complex.
“Extended Data Figure 10: Cryptic RNA transcripts are degraded in part by the RNA exosome complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Spurious RNAs, once polyadenylated, are as stable as full-length RNAs transcribed from canonical TSSs.
“revealing that the spurious RNAs, once polyadenylated, are as stable as the full length RNAs transcribed from canonical TSSs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A fraction of the cryptic transcripts generated in Dnmt3b-/- cells is degraded by the RNA exosome complex.
“Thus, indicating that a fraction of the cryptic transcripts generated in Dnmt3b -/-cells is degraded by the RNA exosome complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Intragenic transcripts in Dnmt3b-/- cells are at least in part polyadenylated.
“showing that the intragenic transcripts are, at least in part, polyadenylated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
RNA polymerase II, during transcription elongation, triggers a safeguard that maintains fidelity of transcription initiation.
“Pol II, through the transcription elongation process, triggers a safety mechanism to ensure its transcription initiation fidelity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDECAP-seq identified 2627 highly expressed TSSs with RPM greater than 6 specific to Dnmt3b-/- cells, 780 TSSs common to both cell lines, and 936 TSSs specific to WT cells.
“This analysis identified 2627 highly expressed TSSs (RPM > 6) specific of the Dnmt3b -/-cells, 780 TSSs common in both the cell lines and 936 specific of WT cells (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEndogenous Dnmt3b binds intragenically, especially on genes in the third and fourth expression quartiles, and this binding correlates with H3K36me3.
“ChIP-seq analysis revealed the intragenic binding of the endogenous Dnmt3b especially on the genes belonging to the third and fourth quartiles (q3-q4) of gene expression and correlated with H3K36me3 histone modification (Fig. 1a-c and Extended Data Fig 1g-q).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDnmt3b knockout in mouse ESCs causes a global reduction of genomic DNA methylation, with a significant decrease of 5mC on exons and introns.
“Whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) in WT or Dnmt3b -/-ESCs revealed a global reduction of genomic DNA methylation, with a significant decrease of the level of 5methylcytosine (5mC) on exons and introns (Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 1r).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDnmt3b binding and DNA methylation loss in Dnmt3b-/- cells correlate with H3K36me3 abundance.
“Genome splitting in deciles of H3K36me3 occupancy showed that both Dnmt3b binding and DNA methylation loss in Dnmt3b -/-cells markedly correlate with the abundance of H3K36me3 (Fig. 1e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntragenic TSSs in Dnmt3b-/- cells show loss of pyrimidine enrichment at position -1 and reduced purine enrichment at position +1 compared with canonical TSSs.
“Our data confirm this observation on canonical TSSs, while on intragenic TSSs we observed the loss of the pyrimidine enrichment at position -1 and a reduced enrichment of the purine at position +1 (Fig. 3f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntragenic TSSs identified in Dnmt3b-/- cells lie in regions with higher H3K36me3 and Dnmt3b binding, loss of methylation upon Dnmt3b depletion, and lower nucleosome occupancy than random intragenic regions.
“The intragenic TSSs identified in Dnmt3b -/-cells were within genomic regions with significantly higher H3K36me3 and Dnmt3b binding, showed loss of methylation upon Dnmt3b depletion, and lower nucleosome occupancy with respect to randomly chosen intragenic regions (Fig. 3e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlmost all highly expressed TSSs identified in Dnmt3b-/- cells are present in PolyA+ and cytosolic DECAP-seq fractions, but at significantly lower expression levels.
“Interestingly, almost all the highly expressed TSSs identified in Dnmt3b -/-cells can be found in the PolyA+ and cytosolic DECAP-seq fractions (Fig. 5c), even though, with a significantly lower level of expression with consequent reduction of the percentage of the total mapped reads (Fig. 5d, e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datamRNAs with fast decay are mainly linked to cell cycle and transcription, whereas slow-decay mRNAs are more linked to metabolism and translation.
“The analysis revealed that fast decay mRNAs are mainly involved in cell cycle and transcription biological processes, while slow decay mRNAs are more related to metabolism and translation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWT and catalytically inactive V725G Dnmt3b proteins show similar intragenic binding profiles, but only WT increases DNA methylation levels.
“Both the Dnmt3b proteins showed similar intragenic binding profiles (Fig. 4g, h and Extended Data Fig. 9b, c), although only the cells expressing the WT protein showed an increase of DNA methylation levels (Extended Data Fig. 9d, e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Dnmt3b-/- cells, few events of alternative splicing and activation of repetitive elements occur, and these regulations were sporadic in the model.
“We tested these hypotheses and, in agreement with the literature, we found few events of alternative splicing and activation of repetitive elements actually occurring in Dnmt3b -/-cells (data not shown). However, these regulations were sporadic in our model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [32] Maunakea, A. K., Chepelev, I., Cui, K. & Zhao, K. Intragenic DNA methylation modulates alternative splicing by recruiting MeCP2 to promote exon recognition. Cell Res. 23, 1256–1269 (2013) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Yearim, A. et al. HP1 is involved in regulating the global impact of DNA methylation on alternative splicing. Cell Reports 10, 1122–1134 (2015) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Jones, P. A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 484–492 (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSetD2-silenced cells have 3560 high-confidence intragenic TSSs with RPM greater than 6, of which 2759 are specific to SetD2 knockdown and more than 2000 are shared with Dnmt3b-/- TSSs.
“This analysis revealed 3560 high confident (RPM > 6) intragenic TSSs in SetD2 silenced cells, of which 2759 were specific of the SetD2 knockdown and more than 2000 were in common with the TSSs identified in Dnmt3b -/-cells (Extended Data Fig. 8l-o and 9a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe percentage of total mapped reads specific for Dnmt3b-/- TSSs was 2.76%, while the percentage for common TSSs was 5.22%.
“The percentage of the total mapped reads specific for Dnmt3b -/-TSSs was 2.76%, while the percentage of common TSSs was 5.22%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSetD2 knockdown drastically reduces H3K36me3 in both WT and Dnmt3b-/- cells and causes loss of Dnmt3b intragenic binding in WT cells.
“SetD2 knockdown resulted in a drastic reduction of H3K36me3 both in WT and Dnmt3b -/-cells and loss of Dnmt3b intragenic binding in WT cells (Fig. 4a-c and Extended Data Fig. 8a-f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth Dnmt3b mutants show impaired Dnmt3b binding and DNA methylation relative to rescue with the WT enzyme.
“Specific impairment of Dnmt3b binding and DNA methylation is observed in both the mutants compared to the rescue by using WT Dnmt3b enzyme.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDnmt3b WT, but not the V725G mutant, significantly raises global DNA 5mC (p = 0.003) according to dot-blot quantification from three biological replicates.
“Dot intensity quantification from three biological replicates revealed that Dnmt3b WT (but not the V725G mutant) significantly (p=0.003)increases global DNA 5mC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTotal RNA-seq showed a significant reduction of the intermediates/first exon ratio in cells expressing WT Dnmt3b, but not in those expressing the Dnmt3b V725G mutant.
“Total RNA-seq (Extended Data Fig. 9f, g) revealed a significant reduction of the intermediates/first exon ratio in the cells expressing the WT Dnmt3b enzyme, but not in those expressing Dnmt3bV725G mutant (Fig. 4i, j).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDnmt3b mutants unable to bind H3K36me3, S277P and VW-RR, show lower intragenic binding, reduced DNA methylation activity, and fail to reduce the intermediates/first exon ratio.
“These Dnmt3b mutants showed lower intragenic binding with reduced DNA methylation activity (Extended Data Fig. 9i, j) and were unable to reduce the intermediates/first exon ratio (Extended Data Fig. 10a-d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSilencing Dis3 and Rrp6 components of the RNA exosome complex does not change the total number of intragenic TSSs but significantly increases their expression level.
“Silencing of the Dis3 and Rrp6 component of the RNA exosome complex did not show changes in the total number of intragenic TSSs (Extended Data Fig. 10e-g), but a significant increase of their expression level (Extended Data Fig. 10h-k).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDNA methylation within gene bodies that depends on Dnmt3b protects the gene body against spurious entry by RNA Pol II and against cryptic transcription initiation.
“Here, we show that the Dnmt3b-dependent intragenic DNA methylation protects the gene body from RNA Polymerase II spurious entry and cryptic transcription initiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSpurious transcripts can either be degraded by the RNA exosome complex or be capped, polyadenylated, and delivered to ribosomes to produce aberrant proteins.
“Furthermore, the spurious transcripts can be either degraded by the RNA exosome complex or capped, polyadenylated, and delivered to the ribosome to produce aberrant proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe ability of Dnmt3b to prevent spurious transcription requires both its catalytic activity and its recruitment to gene bodies by H3K36me3.
“Using different genome-wide approaches, we demonstrate that this Dnmt3b function is dependent on its enzymatic activity and recruitment on the gene body by H3K36me3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDnmt3b preferentially binds to gene bodies through interaction with the histone modification H3K36me3.
“Recent studies have reported that Dnmt3b binds preferentially to the gene bodies by interacting with the histone modification H3K36me3 10,11 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Baubec, T. et al. Genomic profiling of DNA methyltransferases reveals a role for DNMT3B in genic methylation. Nature 520, 243–247 (2015) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Morselli, M. et al. In vivo targeting of de novo DNA methylation by histone modifications in yeast and mouse. eLife 4, e06205 (2015) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGlobal DNA hypomethylation, especially on intragenic regions, is a general feature of most tumours.
“Indeed, the global DNA hypomethylation, especially occurring on intragenic regions, is a general feature of most tumours [35][36][37] .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [35] Jones, P. A. & Baylin, S. B. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 415–428 (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Gaudet, F. et al. Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation. Science 300, 489–492 (2003) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Feinberg, A. P. & Vogelstein, B. Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature 301, 89–92 (1983) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA fraction of spurious transcripts is degraded, and not all cryptic transcripts undergo polyadenylation and nuclear export.
“confirming that a fraction of the spurious transcripts is actually degraded and indicating that not all cryptic transcripts undergo polyadenylation and nuclear export.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPartial internal RNAs generated by loss of transcription initiation fidelity could impact multiple biological processes and favour tumour cell heterogeneity and neoplastic predisposition.
“Partial internal RNAs generated by the loss of transcription initiation fidelity, could impact on multiple biological processes impairing molecular mechanisms such as regulation of the gene expression, miRNA targeting, truncated proteins generation and others, thus favouring (stochastic) tumour cell heterogeneity and neoplastic predisposition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe intragenic transcription initiation result was confirmed on technical and biological replicates and by RT-qPCR on a subset of genes.
“Analysis performed on technical and biological replicates, and validation by RT-qPCR on a subset of genes confirmed this result (Extended Data Fig. 2c-e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataComparative methylation analyses used only CpGs covered at least 5x in both WT and Dnmt3b-/- cells.
“Methylation calling was performed using the methratio.pyscript provided with the BSMAP tool and comparative analyses were performed by using only CpG covered at least 5x in both wt and Dnmt3b -/-cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBoth RppH-treated and untreated samples had a double peak near 130 bp from adapter dimers, but only the RppH-treated sample showed the higher enrichment corresponding to decapped RNA fragments.
“RppH treated and untreated samples showed a double peak around 130bp corresponding to the dimers of adapter, but only the RppH treated sample showed a higher enrichment (in the red box) corresponding to the decapped RNA fragments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLoss or mutation of SETD2 and the consequent loss of H3K36me3 is a key event in promoting cancer growth and malignancy.
“Moreover, several recent studies reported the loss/mutation of SETD2 and the consequent loss of H3K36me3 histone mark as a key event in promoting cancer growth and malignancy [38][39][40] .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [38] Kanu, N. et al. SETD2 loss-of-function promotes renal cancer branched evolution through replication stress and impaired DNA repair. Oncogene 34, 5699–5708 (2015) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Fontebasso, A. M. et al. Mutations in SETD2 and genes affecting histone H3K36 methylation target hemispheric high-grade gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 125, 659–669 (2013) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Duns, G. et al. Histone methyltransferase gene SETD2 is a novel tumor suppressor gene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 70, 4287–4291 (2010) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOnly reexpression of WT Dnmt3b rescues the loss of spurious intragenic transcription initiation in Dnmt3b-/- cells, demonstrating that Dnmt3b-dependent DNA methylation prevents cryptic intragenic transcription.
“Thus, only the reexpression of the WT Dnmt3b was able to rescue the loss of spurious intragenic transcription initiation in Dnmt3b -/-cells demonstrating that Dnmt3bdependent DNA methylation is responsible for preventing the occurrence of cryptic intragenic transcription.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTwo independent Dnmt3b knockout ESC lines were generated to exclude experimental artefacts from different genetic backgrounds or prolonged culturing.
“we generated two independent Dnmt3b knockout cell lines from mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) line E14 to exclude experimental artefacts due to different genetic backgrounds, or prolonged cell culturing (Extended Data Fig. 1a-f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe gene ontology result matches earlier observations in mouse embryonic stem cells, supporting the validity of the experiment.
“This result is in agreement with that previously observed in mESCs 54,55 , thus suggesting the bona fide of the experiment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [54] Sharova, L. V. et al. Database for mRNA half-life of 19 977 genes obtained by DNA microarray analysis of pluripotent and differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA Res. 16, 45–58 (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] Schwanhäusser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe cells used were mycoplasma free.
“The cells were mycoplasma free.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe ChIP-seq results were confirmed by ChIP-qPCR on selected genomic regions and by co-immunoprecipitation of Dnmt3b with H3K36me3 in wild-type and Dnmt3b -/- embryonic stem cells.
“The ChIP-seq data were validated by ChIP-qPCR, using several biological replicates, on target genomic regions and by not cross-linked co-immunoprecipitation experiments between Dnmt3b and H3K36me3 in WT or Dnmt3b -/-ESCs (Extended Data Fig.1o, p).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDnmt3b-dependent DNA methylation on the gene body prevents aberrant transcription initiation events and is necessary to guarantee mRNA transcription initiation fidelity.
“We now demonstrate that Dnmt3b-dependent DNA methylation on the gene body is responsible for the prevention of aberrant transcription initiation events necessary to guarantee the mRNA transcription initiation fidelity (Extended Data Fig. 12a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMock embryonic stem cells correlated more strongly with Dnmt3b mutant-transfected cells (r = 0.99) than with Dnmt3b WT-transfected cells (r = 0.95), suggesting that DNA methylation activity is the main driver of transcriptome changes caused by Dnmt3b.
“Of note, Mock ESCs showed higher correlation with Dnmt3b mutant transfected ESCs (r = 0.99) with respect that Dnmt3b WT transfected ESCs (r = 0.95), thus suggesting that DNA methylation enzymatic activity is the major driver of the Dnmt3b-dependent transcriptome alterations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDECAP-seq replicates showed high overlap in the number of intragenic TSSs and read distribution.
“The number of intragenic TSSs and the reads distribution was similar in both the DECAP-seq replicates showing high overlap (Extended Data Fig. 6k-m)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Dnmt3b ChIP-seq antibody immunoprecipitated endogenous Dnmt3b cross-linked to chromatin and showed no background signal in Dnmt3b-/- cells.
“To investigate the distribution of the endogenous Dnmt3b we tested different antibodies and found one that was able to immunoprecipitate the endogenous Dnmt3b cross-linked to chromatin, which showed no background signal in Dnmt3b -/-(Extended Data Fig. 1g-i”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDECAP-seq is cap- and strand-specific, as indicated by a sharp TSS peak appearing only on the relevant DNA strand.
“A pronounced sharp peak (red arrow) is present on the TSS only on the respective gene strand, thus reflecting both the cap-and strandnessspecificity of the method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRppH in Thermopol buffer can remove the 5' pyrophosphate and cap from RNA, leaving a 5' monophosphate.
“in Thermopol buffer is able to mediate decapping and pyrophosphate removal from the 5´ end of RNA to leave a 5´ monophosphate RNA (5'-P).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites S1
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The function of gene body DNA methylation in highly expressed genes has not yet been clarified.
“while the functional role of gene body DNA methylation in highly expressed genes has yet to be clarified.”
“the function of gene body DNA methylation has not yet been clarified.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Silencing SetD2 in mammalian cells causes cryptic transcription initiation in a large fraction of active genes.
“Silencing of SetD2 in mammalian cells leads to cryptic transcription initiation of a large fraction of active genes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Silencing Dis3 and Rrp6 impairs RNA exosome degradation of cryptic transcripts.
“Silencing of the Dis3 and Rrp6 component of the RNA exosome complex did not show changes in the total number of intragenic TSSs (Extended Data Fig. 10e-g), but a significant increase of their expression level (Extended Data Fig. 10h-k).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loss of DNMT3B in mouse embryonic stem cells results in spurious initiation of alternative promoters.
“loss of DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B) in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells was shown to result in spurious initiation of alternative promoters21.”
From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
The Analysis of intragenic spurious transcription section reports increased cryptic initiation within gene bodies in Dnmt3b-knockout embryonic stem cells. It also says some alternative promoters were reactivated, but found no general reactivation; Extended Data Figure 3 identifies only 4 of 2,563 genes with such reactivation. The claim conflates the broader spurious-initiation finding with the much narrower alternative-promoter finding. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSETD2 deposits H3K36me3 after Pol2 passage, which in turn recruits DNMT3B to maintain a repressive chromatin state.
“The methyltransferase SETD2 deposits H3K36me355 after Pol2 passage56, which in turn recruits DNMT3B21 to maintain a repressive chromatin state57.”
From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
The gene body coverage of H3K36me3 coincides with the DNMT3B coverage.
“As H3K36me3 recruits DNMT3B21, the gene body coverage of H3K36me3 (Supplementary Fig. 6b) coincides with the DNMT3B coverage”
From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Genome-wide perturbation strategies are associated with pleiotropic phenotypes and inevitably confound interpretation of results.
“Although discoveries regarding 5mC function and regulation have been made with genome-wide perturbation strategies, these methods are associated with pleiotropic phenotypes and inevitably confound the interpretation of results (35).”
From Dynamic DNA methylation: In the right place at the right time (2018) · cites this paper as [35]
Genes in the A compartment had lower methylation at TSS but higher methylation at gene bodies than genes in the B compartment.
“We observed that genes in the A compartment had lower methylation at transcription starting site (TSS) but higher methylation at gene bodies than genes in the B compartment (Extended Data Fig. 11b), consistent with the distinct roles of DNA methylations at different regions47.”
From Subtype-specific 3D genome alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · see citing works
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · see citing works
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668 · see citing works
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A., & Li, E. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81656-6 · Cited by 6,143 · see citing works
Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond
Jones, P. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3230 · Cited by 6,061 · see citing works
The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer
Jones, P. A., & Baylin, S. B. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg816 · Cited by 5,648 · see citing works
Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells
Mikkelsen, T. S., Ku, M., Jaffe, D. B., Issac, B., Lieberman, E., Giannoukos, G., Alvarez, P., Brockman, W., Kim, T.-K., Koche, R. P., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06008 · Cited by 4,129 · see citing works
Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq
Trapnell, C., Hendrickson, D. G., Sauvageau, M., Goff, L., Rinn, J. L., & Pachter, L. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2450 · Cited by 3,492 · see citing works
Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts
Feinberg, A. P., & Vogelstein, B. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/301089a0 · Cited by 2,430 · see citing works
Ingolia, N. T., Lareau, L. F., & Weissman, J. S. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
Function and information content of DNA methylation
Schübeler, D. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14192 · Cited by 2,060 · see citing works
The DNA methyltransferases of mammals
Bestor, T. H. (2000) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/9.16.2395 · Cited by 2,045 · see citing works
Nascent RNA Sequencing Reveals Widespread Pausing and Divergent Initiation at Human Promoters
Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. J., & Lis, J. T. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162228 · Cited by 1,986 · see citing works
Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters
Maunakea, A. K., Nagarajan, R. P., Bilenky, M., Ballinger, T. J., D’Souza, C., Fouse, S. D., Johnson, B. E., Hong, C., Nielsen, C., Zhao, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09165 · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation
Gaudet, F., Hodgson, J. G., Eden, A., Jackson-Grusby, L., Dausman, J., Gray, J. W., Leonhardt, H., & Jaenisch, R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083558 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution
Carninci, P., Sandelin, A., Lenhard, B., Katayama, S., Shimokawa, K., Ponjavic, J., Semple, C. A. M., Taylor, M. S., Engström, P. G., Frith, M. C., et al. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1789 · Cited by 1,350 · see citing works
Carrozza, M. J., Li, B., Florens, L. A., Suganuma, T., Swanson, S. K., Lee, K. K., Shia, W.-J., Anderson, S., Yates, J. R., Washburn, M. P., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.023 · Cited by 1,297 · see citing works
BSMAP: whole genome bisulfite sequence MAPping program
Xi, Y., & Li, W. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-232 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Understanding the language of Lys36 methylation at histone H3
Wagner, E. J., & Carpenter, P. B. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3274 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
DNA methylation, methyltransferases, and cancer
Robertson, K. D. (2001) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204341 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Genomic profiling of DNA methyltransferases reveals a role for DNMT3B in genic methylation
Baubec, T., Colombo, D. F., Wirbelauer, C., Schmidt, J., Burger, L., Krebs, A. R., Akalin, A., & Schübeler, D. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14176 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
The RNA polymerase II core promoter: a key component in the regulation of gene expressionPreprint
Butler, J. E. F., & Kadonaga, J. T. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1026202 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Sharova, L. V., Sharov, A. A., Nedorezov, T., Piao, Y., Shaik, N., & Ko, M. S. H. (2009) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dsn030 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Maunakea, A. K., Chepelev, I., Cui, K., & Zhao, K. (2013) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2013.110 · Cited by 552 · see citing works
Dynamic histone H3 methylation during gene induction: HYPB/Setd2 mediates all H3K36 trimethylation
Edmunds, J. W., Mahadevan, L. C., & Clayton, A. L. (2008) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601967 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
New concepts in DNA methylation
Jeltsch, A., & Jurkowska, R. Z. (2014) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2014.05.002 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
The bacterial enzyme RppH triggers messenger RNA degradation by 5′ pyrophosphate removal
Deana, A., Čelešnik, H., & Belasco, J. G. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06475 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
DNA Methylation and Demethylation in Mammals
Chen, Z., & Riggs, A. D. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r110.205286 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Fontebasso, A. M., Schwartzentruber, J., Khuong-Quang, D.-A., Liu, X.-Y., Sturm, D., Korshunov, A., Jones, D., Witt, H., Kool, M., Albrecht, S., et al. (2013) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1095-8 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Chapter 17 Messenger RNA Half‐Life Measurements in Mammalian Cells
Chen, C. A., Ezzeddine, N., & Shyu, A. (2008) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(08)02617-7 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Yoh, S. M., Lucas, J., & Jones, K. A. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1720008 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Li, J., Pu, M., Hirasawa, R., Li, B.-Z., Huang, Y.-N., Zeng, R., Jing, N.-H., Chen, T., Li, E., Sasaki, H., et al. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01380-07 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Duns, G., van den Berg, E., van Duivenbode, I., Osinga, J., Hollema, H., Hofstra, R. M. W., & Kok, K. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0120 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
HP1 Is Involved in Regulating the Global Impact of DNA Methylation on Alternative Splicing
Yearim, A., Gelfman, S., Shayevitch, R., Melcer, S., Glaich, O., Mallm, J., Nissim‐Rafinia, M., Cohen, A.-H., Rippe, K., Meshorer, E., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.038 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Sp1 binding is inhibited by mCpmCpG methylation
Clark, S. J., Harrison, J., & Molloy, P. L. (1997) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00164-9 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Neri, F., Dettori, D., Incarnato, D., Křepelová, A., Rapelli, S., Maldotti, M., Parlato, C., Paliogiannis, P., & Oliviero, S. (2014) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2014.356 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citationYankulov, K., Yamashita, K., Roy, R., Egly, J., & Bentley, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.41.23922 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Molecular Enzymology of the Catalytic Domains of the Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b DNA Methyltransferases
Gowher, H., & Jeltsch, A. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m202148200 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Neri, F., Křepelová, A., Incarnato, D., Maldotti, M., Parlato, C., Galvagni, F., Matarese, F., Stunnenberg, H. G., & Oliviero, S. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.056 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationKanu, N., Gronroos, E. C., Martinez, P., Burrell, R. A., Goh, X. Y., Bártková, J., Maya‐Mendoza, A., Mistrík, M., Rowan, A., Patel, H., et al. (2015) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2015.24 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Neri, F., Incarnato, D., Krepelova, A., Rapelli, S., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., Parlato, C., & Oliviero, S. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r91 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationCarvalho, S., Raposo, A. C., Martins, F. B., Grosso, A. R., Sridhara, S. R. C., Rino, J., Carmo‐Fonseca, M., & de Almeida, S. F. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1472 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
In vivo targeting of de novo DNA methylation by histone modifications in yeast and mouse
Morselli, M., Pastor, W. A., Montanini, B., Nee, K., Ferrari, R., Fu, K., Bonora, G., Rubbi, L., Clark, A. T., Ottonello, S., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.06205 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
BOCHNIG, P., Reuter, R., Bringmann, P., et al. (1987) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13439.x · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Neri, F., Incarnato, D., Křepelová, A., Rapelli, S., Anselmi, F., Parlato, C., Medana, C., Bello, F. D., & Oliviero, S. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.008 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationIncarnato, D., Neri, F., Anselmi, F., & Oliviero, S. (2014) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0491-2 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome-wide technology for determining RNA stability in mammalian cells
Tani, H., & Akimitsu, N. (2012) · RNA Biology · doi:10.4161/rna.22036 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Maderious, A., & Chen‐Kiang, S. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.19.5931 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Hogart, A., Lichtenberg, J., Ajay, S. S., Anderson, S., NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, Margulies, E. H., & Bodine, D. M. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.132878.111 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Douet, V., Heller, M. B., & Saux, O. L. (2006) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.151 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
GA-binding Protein-dependent Transcription Initiator Elements
Yu, M.-Y., Yang, X., Schmidt, T., Chinenov, Y., Wang, R., & Martin, M. E. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.46.29060 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Uchiumi, F., Miyazaki, S., & Tanuma, S.-I. (2011) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0674-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Incarnato, D., Neri, F., Diamanti, D., & Oliviero, S. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt629 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationIncarnato, D., Křepelová, A., & Neri, F. (2014) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.06.007 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing
Horvath, S., & Raj, K. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3 · Cited by 3,095 · see citing works
The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease
Greenberg, M., & Bourc’his, D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0159-6 · Cited by 2,160 · see citing works
Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants
Zhang, H., Lang, Z., & Zhu, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
The DNA methyltransferase family: a versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation
Lyko, F. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.80 · Cited by 1,475 · see citing works
DNA methylation: a historical perspective
Mattei, A. L., Bailly, N., & Meissner, A. (2022) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2022.03.010 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
Eukaryotic core promoters and the functional basis of transcription initiation
Haberle, V., & Stark, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0028-8 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Dynamic DNA methylation: In the right place at the right time
Luo, C., Hajkova, P., & Ecker, J. R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat6806 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
DNA Methylation Clocks in Aging: Categories, Causes, and Consequences
Field, A. E., Robertson, N., Wang, T., Havas, A. P., Ideker, T., & Adams, P. D. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.008 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
The impact of cellular metabolism on chromatin dynamics and epigenetics
Reid, M. A., Dai, Z., & Locasale, J. W. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3629 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Born to run: control of transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II
Chen, F. X., Smith, E. R., & Shilatifard, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0010-5 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Aging Hallmarks and the Role of Oxidative Stress
Maldonado, E., Morales-Pison, S., Urbina, F., & Solari, A. (2023) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox12030651 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
DNA methylation loss in late-replicating domains is linked to mitotic cell division
Zhou, W., Dinh, H. Q., Ramjan, Z., Weisenberger, D. J., Nicolet, C. M., Shen, H., Laird, P. W., & Berman, B. P. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0073-4 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
DNA hypermethylation in disease: mechanisms and clinical relevance
Ehrlich, M. (2019) · Epigenetics · doi:10.1080/15592294.2019.1638701 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Role of Mammalian DNA Methyltransferases in Development
Chen, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-103019-102815 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Defining Driver DNA Methylation Changes in Human Cancer
Pfeifer, G. P. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19041166 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Chen, L., Chen, J., Huang, Y.-J., Gu, Y., Qiu, J., Qian, H., Shao, C., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Li, H., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.029 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
The DNA methylation landscape in cancer
Skvortsova, K., Stirzaker, C., & Taberlay, P. C. (2019) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190037 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
TERT—Regulation and Roles in Cancer Formation
Dratwa, M., Wysoczańska, B., Łacina, P., Kubik, T., & Bogunia‐Kubik, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.589929 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Metabolic and Epigenetic Coordination of T Cell and Macrophage Immunity
Phan, A. T., Goldrath, A. W., & Glass, C. K. (2017) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.016 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Cellular and epigenetic drivers of stem cell ageing
Ermolaeva, M., Neri, F., Ori, A., & Rudolph, K. L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0020-3 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationTranscriptional and epigenomic landscapes of CNS and non-CNS vascular endothelial cells
Sabbagh, M. F., Heng, J. S., Luo, C., Castanon, R. G., Nery, J. R., Rattner, A., Goff, L. A., Ecker, J. R., & Nathans, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36187 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
He, L. S., Huang, H., Bradai, M., Zhao, C., You, Y., Ma, J., Zhao, L., Lozano‐Durán, R., & Zhu, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28940-2 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Prenatal stress and epigenetics
Cao-Lei, L., de Rooij, S. R., King, S., Matthews, S. G., Metz, G. A. S., Roseboom, T. J., & Szyf, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.016 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
The interplay between DNA and histone methylation: molecular mechanisms and disease implications
Li, Y., Chen, X., & Lu, C. (2021) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202051803 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
SETD2 Restricts Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Integrating EZH2 and AMPK Signaling Pathways
Yuan, H., Han, Y., Wang, X., Li, N., Liu, Q., Yin, Y., Wang, H., Pan, L., Li, L., Song, K., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.05.022 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Epigenome-associated phenotypic acclimatization to ocean acidification in a reef-building coral
Liew, Y. J., Zoccola, D., Li, Y., Tambutté, É., Venn, A. A., Michell, C., Cui, G., Deutekom, E. S., Kaandorp, J. A., Voolstra, C. R., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar8028 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Ginno, P. A., Gaidatzis, D., Feldmann, A., Hoerner, L., Imanci, D., Burger, L., Zilbermann, F., Peters, A. H. F. M., Edenhofer, F., Smallwood, S. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16354-x · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Subtype-specific 3D genome alteration in acute myeloid leukaemia
Xu, J., Song, F., Lyu, H., Kobayashi, M., Zhang, B., Zhao, Z., Hou, Y., Wang, X., Luan, Y., Jia, B., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05365-x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
The Roles of Human DNA Methyltransferases and Their Isoforms in Shaping the Epigenome
Gujar, H., Weisenberger, D. J., & Liang, G. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10020172 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Enhancer DNA methylation: implications for gene regulation
Angeloni, A., & Bogdanović, O. (2019) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190030 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Environmental Toxicants: Epigenetics as an Underlying Mechanism
Tran, N. Q. V., & Miyake, K. (2017) · International Journal of Genomics · doi:10.1155/2017/7526592 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
MLL2 conveys transcription-independent H3K4 trimethylation in oocytes
Hanna, C., Taudt, A., Huang, J.-H., Gahurová, L., Kranz, A., Andrews, S. R., Dean, W., Stewart, A., Colomé-Tatché, M., & Kelsey, G. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-017-0013-5 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Histone Marks in the ‘Driver’s Seat’: Functional Roles in Steering the Transcription Cycle
Gates, L. A., Foulds, C. E., & O’Malley, B. W. (2017) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2017.10.004 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Evolution of DNA Methylome Diversity in Eukaryotes
de Mendoza, A., Lister, R., & Bogdanović, O. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.003 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Mammalian DNA methyltransferases: new discoveries and open questions
Gowher, H., & Jeltsch, A. (2018) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20170574 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Role of gene body methylation in acclimatization and adaptation in a basal metazoan
Dixon, G., Liao, Y., Bay, L. K., & Matz, M. V. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1813749115 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Jeziorska, D. M., Murray, R. J. S., De Gobbi, M., Gaentzsch, R., Garrick, D., Ayyub, H., Chen, T., Li, E., Telenius, J., Lynch, M., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1703087114 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Dahlet, T., Lleida, A. A., Adhami, H. A., Dumas, M., Bender, A., Ngondo, R. P., Tanguy, M., Vallet, J., Auclair, G., Bardet, A. F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16919-w · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Choi, J., Lyons, D. B., Kim, M. Y., Moore, J. D., & Zilberman, D. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.011 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Histone H3.3 phosphorylation amplifies stimulation-induced transcription
Armache, A., Yang, S., de Paz, A. M., Robbins, L., Durmaz, C., Cheong, J., Ravishankar, A., Daman, A. W., Ahimovic, D. J., Klevorn, T., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2533-0 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Epigenetics in Insects: Genome Regulation and the Generation of Phenotypic Diversity
Glastad, K. M., Hunt, B. G., & Goodisman, M. A. D. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111914 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Histone methyltransferase SETD2 modulates alternative splicing to inhibit intestinal tumorigenesis
Yuan, H., Li, N., Fu, D., Ren, J., Hui, J., Peng, J., Liu, Y., Qiu, T., Jiang, M., Pan‐Hammarström, Q., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci94292 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Gene body methylation in cancer: molecular mechanisms and clinical applications
Wang, Q., Xiong, F., Wu, G., Liu, W., Chen, J., Wang, B., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-022-01382-9 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Cell of Origin and Genetic Alterations in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Myeloma
Barwick, B. G., Gupta, V. A., Vertino, P. M., & Boise, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01121 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Muyle, A., Seymour, D. K., Lv, Y., Hüettel, B., & Gaut, B. S. (2022) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evac038 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Understanding histone H3 lysine 36 methylation and its deregulation in disease
Li, J., Ahn, J. H., & Wang, G. G. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03144-y · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Diagouraga, B., Clément, J. A. J., Duret, L., Kadlec, J., de Massy, B., & Baudat, F. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.033 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Roadmap of DNA methylation in breast cancer identifies novel prognostic biomarkers
de Almeida, B. P., Apolónio, J. D., Binnie, A., & Castelo‐Branco, P. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5403-0 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Molecular Complexes at Euchromatin, Heterochromatin and Centromeric Chromatin
Morrison, O., & Thakur, J. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22136922 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
The role and mechanisms of DNA methylation in the oocyte
Sendžikaitė, G., & Kelsey, G. (2019) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190043 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Structural Basis of DNMT1 and DNMT3A-Mediated DNA Methylation
Ren, W., Gao, L., & Song, J. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9120620 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Dynamic DNA methylation during aging: A "prophet" of age-related outcomes
Xiao, F.-H., Wang, H.-T., & Kong, Q.-P. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00107 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Epigenetic-sensitive pathways in personalized therapy of major cardiovascular diseases
Schiano, C., Benincasa, G., Franzese, M., Mura, N. D., Pane, K., Salvatore, M., & Claudio Napoli, A. (2020) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107514 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Epigenetic Regulations in Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Kuehner, J. N., Bruggeman, E. C., Wen, Z., & Yao, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00268 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulation in development: is the mouse a good model for the human?
Hanna, C. W., Demond, H., & Kelsey, G. (2018) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy021 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Homeobox oncogene activation by pan-cancer DNA hypermethylation
Su, J., Huang, Y., Cui, X., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Lei, Y., Xu, J., Lin, X., Chen, K., Lv, J., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1492-3 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
DNA Methylation and Susceptibility to Autism Spectrum Disorder
Tremblay, M. W., & Jiang, Y. (2019) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-120417-091431 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Staying true to yourself: mechanisms of DNA methylation maintenance in mammals
Petryk, N., Bultmann, S., Bartke, T., & Defossez, P. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1154 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Shaping the cellular landscape with Set2/SETD2 methylation
McDaniel, S. L., & Strahl, B. D. (2017) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2517-x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Signatures of DNA Methylation across Insects Suggest Reduced DNA Methylation Levels in Holometabola
Provataris, P., Meusemann, K., Niehuis, O., Grath, S., & Misof, B. Y. (2018) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evy066 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Li, Y., Liew, Y. J., Cui, G., Cziesielski, M. J., Zahran, N., Michell, C., Voolstra, C. R., & Aranda, M. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat2142 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Old cogs, new tricks: the evolution of gene expression in a chromatin context
Talbert, P. B., Meers, M. P., & Henikoff, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0105-7 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Martin-Herranz, D. E., Aref‐Eshghi, E., Bonder, M. J., Stubbs, T. M., Choufani, S., Weksberg, R., Stegle, O., Sadiković, B., Reik, W., & Thornton, J. M. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1753-9 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
MeCP2 Represses the Rate of Transcriptional Initiation of Highly Methylated Long Genes
Boxer, L. D., Renthal, W. R., Greben, A. W., Whitwam, T., Silberfeld, A., Stroud, H., Li, E., Yang, M. G., Kinde, B., Griffith, E. C., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.032 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
B cell activation and plasma cell differentiation are inhibited by de novo DNA methylation
Barwick, B. G., Scharer, C. D., Martinez, R. J., Price, M. J., Wein, A. N., Haines, R. R., Bally, A. P. R., Kohlmeier, J. E., & Boss, J. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04234-4 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The Yin and Yang of Histone Marks in Transcription
Talbert, P. B., & Henikoff, S. (2021) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-120220-085159 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Huang, C., & Zhu, B. M. (2018) · Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1007/s41048-018-0063-1 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
SETDB1-dependent heterochromatin stimulates alternative lengthening of telomeres
Gauchier, M., Kan, S., Barral, A., Sauzet, S., Agirre, E., Bonnell, E., Saksouk, N., Barth, T. K., Ide, S., Urbach, S., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3673 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
An Epigenetic Role of Mitochondria in Cancer
Liu, Y., Chen, C., Wang, X., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Chen, J., & Shi, Y. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11162518 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Intrinsic apoptosis shapes the tumor spectrum linked to inactivation of the deubiquitinase BAP1
He, M. X., Chaurushiya, M. S., Webster, J. D., Kummerfeld, S., Reja, R., Chaudhuri, S., Chen, Y., Modrusan, Z. D., Haley, B., Dugger, D. L., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav4902 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
DNMT3B Functions: Novel Insights From Human Disease
Gagliardi, M., Strazzullo, M., & Matarazzo, M. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2018.00140 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Epigenomic Reprogramming as a Driver of Malignant Glioma
Phillips, R. E., Soshnev, A. A., & Allis, C. D. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.008 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Large-scale analysis of DFNA5 methylation reveals its potential as biomarker for breast cancer
Croes, L., Beyens, M., Fransén, E., Ibrahim, J., Berghe, W. V., Suls, A., Peeters, M., Pauwels, P., Camp, G. V., & de Beeck, K. O. (2018) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-018-0479-y · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Emerging roles of histone modifications and HDACs in RNA splicing
Rahhal, R., & Seto, E. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz292 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Transcription Restart Establishes Chromatin Accessibility after DNA Replication
Stewart-Morgan, K. R., Reverón-Gómez, N., & Groth, A. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.033 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Role of Methylation in Pro- and Anti-Cancer Immunity
Mehdi, A., & Rabbani, S. A. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13030545 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Gabriele, M., Lopez Tobon, A., D'Agostino, G., & Testa, G. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.013 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
HIF-1 transcription activity: HIF1A driven response in normoxia and in hypoxia
Cimmino, F., Avitabile, M., Lasorsa, V. A., Montella, A., Pezone, L., Cantalupo, S., Visconte, F., Corrias, M. V., Iolascon, A., & Capasso, M. (2019) · BMC Medical Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12881-019-0767-1 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Gene body DNA methylation conspires with H3K36me3 to preclude aberrant transcription
Teissandier, A., & Bourc’his, D. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201796812 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The Histone Code of Senescence
Paluvai, H., Giorgio, E. D., & Brancolini, C. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9020466 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Transcription-driven chromatin repression of Intragenic transcription start sites
Nielsen, M., Ard, R., Leng, X., Ivanov, M., Kindgren, P., Pelechano, V., & Marquardt, S. (2019) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007969 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Shah, S., Molinaro, G., Liu, B., Wang, R., Huber, K. M., & Richter, J. D. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.076 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Harris, K. D., Lloyd, J. P. B., Domb, K., Zilberman, D., & Zemach, A. (2019) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-019-0307-4 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
H3K36 trimethylation-mediated biological functions in cancer
Chu, X., Fan, T. T., Tian, H., Zheng, Y., Zhou, Z., Li, S., Li, C., & He, J. (2021) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-021-01187-2 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Therapeutic targeting of DNA methylation alterations in cancer
Lee, A. V., Nestler, K. A., & Chiappinelli, K. B. (2024) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2024.108640 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Yagi, M., Kabata, M., Tanaka, A., Ukai, T., Ohta, S., Nakabayashi, K., Shimizu, M., Hata, K., Meissner, A., Yamamoto, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16989-w · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Targeted protein degradation reveals a direct role of SPT6 in RNAPII elongation and termination
Narain, A., Bhandare, P., Adhikari, B., Backes, S., Eilers, M., Dölken, L., Schlösser, A., Erhard, F., Baluapuri, A., & Wolf, E. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.016 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Gatzmann, F., Falckenhayn, C., Gutekunst, J., Hanna, K., Raddatz, G., Carneiro, V. C., & Lyko, F. (2018) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-018-0229-6 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Understanding the Relevance of DNA Methylation Changes in Immune Differentiation and Disease
de la Calle‐Fabregat, C., Morante-Palacios, O., & Ballestar, E. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11010110 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Alterations to DNMT3A in Hematologic Malignancies
Venugopal, K., Feng, Y., Shabashvili, D. E., & Guryanova, O. A. (2020) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-3033 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The Role of Host Cell DNA Methylation in the Immune Response to Bacterial Infection
Qin, W., Scicluna, B. P., & van der Poll, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.696280 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Recent advances in biosensors for in vitro detection and in vivo imaging of DNA methylation
Zhang, Q. Y., Wu, Y., Xu, Q., et al. (2020) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2020.112712 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Viitaniemi, H. M., Verhagen, I., Visser, M. E., Honkela, A., van Oers, K., & Husby, A. (2019) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evz044 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Stern, J. L., Paucek, R. D., Huang, F. W., Ghandi, M., Nwumeh, R., Costello, J. C., & Cech, T. R. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.001 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Dukatz, M., Holzer, K., Choudalakis, M., Emperle, M., Lungu, C., Bashtrykov, P., & Jeltsch, A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.09.006 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Tiger Rattlesnake genome reveals a complex genotype underlying a simple venom phenotype
Margres, M. J., Rautsaw, R. M., Strickland, J. L., Mason, A. J., Schramer, T. D., Hofmann, E. P., Stiers, E., Ellsworth, S. A., Nystrom, G. S., Hogan, M., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014634118 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Recombination, meiotic expression and human codon usage
Pouyet, F., Mouchiroud, D., Duret, L., & Sémon, M. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27344 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Methylation analysis of Gasdermin E shows great promise as a biomarker for colorectal cancer
Ibrahim, J., de Beeck, K. O., Fransén, E., Croes, L., Beyens, M., Suls, A., Berghe, W. V., Peeters, M., & Camp, G. V. (2019) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.2103 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Epigenetic Regulation of microRNAs in Cancer: Shortening the Distance from Bench to Bedside
Pajares, M. J., Alemany-Cosme, E., Goñi, S., Bandrés, E., Palanca-Ballester, C., & Sandoval, J. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22147350 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
DNA Methylation: From Cancer Biology to Clinical Perspectives
Chen, C., Wang, Z., Ding, Y., Wang, L., Wang, S., Wang, H., & Qin, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.31083/j.fbl2712326 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
- Authors
- Neri, F., Rapelli, S., Krepelova, A., Incarnato, D., Parlato, C., Basile, G., Maldotti, M., Anselmi, F., & Oliviero, S.
- Affiliations
- Italian institute for Genomic Medicine (IT)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Neri, Francesco
- Oliviero, Salvatore
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-02-22
- Volume
- 543
- Issue
- 7643
- Pages
- 72-77
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2589386142
- Semantic Scholar
- 1e92f02718723d76aae589d66f60a1d9a01188d5
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 43 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 30.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG-2014)
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer-related gene regulation
- Keywords
- gene body methylation, DNMT3B, RNA polymerase II, H3K36me3, SETD2, RNA exosome, epigenetic crosstalk, mouse embryonic stem cells, CpG methylation
- MeSH terms
- Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells, DNA Methyltransferase 3B, Animals, Cell Line, DNA, DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases, Genes, Histones, Lysine, Neoplasms, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Ribosomes, RNA Caps, RNA Polymerase II, RNA, Messenger, DNA Methylation, RNA Stability, Transcription Initiation Site, Polyadenylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Transcription Initiation, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review