Cited by 225Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Myt1l safeguards neuronal identity by actively repressing many non-neuronal fates

Open access
Mall, Moritz, Kareta, Michael S., Chanda, Soham, Ahlenius, Henrik, Perotti, Nicholas, Zhou, Bo, Grieder, Sarah D., Ge, Xuecai +12 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Normal differentiation and induced reprogramming require the activation of target cell programs and silencing of donor cell programs. In reprogramming, the same factors are often used to reprogram many different donor cell types. As most developmental repressors, such as RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST) and Groucho (also known as TLE), are considered lineage-specific repressors, it remains unclear how identical combinations of transcription factors can silence so many different donor programs. Distinct lineage repressors would have to be induced in different donor cell types. Here, by studying the reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neurons, we found that the pan neuron-specific transcription factor Myt1-like (Myt1l) exerts its pro-neuronal function by direct repression of many different somatic lineage programs except the neuronal program. The repressive function of Myt1l is mediated via recruitment of a complex containing Sin3b by binding to a previously uncharacterized N-terminal domain. In agreement with its repressive function, the genomic binding sites of Myt1l are similar in neurons and fibroblasts and are preferentially in an open chromatin configuration. The Notch signalling pathway is repressed by Myt1l through silencing of several members, including Hes1. Acute knockdown of Myt1l in the developing mouse brain mimicked a Notch gain-of-function phenotype, suggesting that Myt1l allows newborn neurons to escape Notch activation during normal development. Depletion of Myt1l in primary postmitotic neurons de-repressed non-neuronal programs and impaired neuronal gene expression and function, indicating that many somatic lineage programs are actively and persistently repressed by Myt1l to maintain neuronal identity. It is now tempting to speculate that similar 'many-but-one' lineage repressors exist for other cell fates; such repressors, in combination with lineage-specific activators, would be prime candidates for use in reprogramming additional cell types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature21722

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Schäfer BW, Blakely BT, Darlington GJ & Blau HM Effect of cell history on response to helix-loop-helix family of myogenic regulators. Nature 344, 454– 458 (1990). 2157160
  2. [2]Terranova R, Pereira CF, Roure, Du, C., Merkenschlager, M. & Fisher, A. G. Acquisition and extinction of gene expression programs are separable events in heterokaryon reprogramming. J Cell Sci 119, 2065– 2072 (2006). 16638804
  3. [3]Xu J, Du Y & Deng H Direct lineage reprogramming: strategies, mechanisms, and applications. Cell Stem Cell 16, 119– 134 (2015). 25658369
  4. [4]Santisteban P, Recacha P, Metzger DE & Zaret KS Dynamic expression of groucho-related genes Grg1and Grg3in foregut endoderm and antagonism of differentiation. Dev Dyn 239, 980– 986 (2010). 20108349 PMC3071952
  5. [5]Schoenherr CJ & Anderson DJ The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes. Science 267, 1360– 1363 (1995). 7871435
  6. [6]Matsushita F, Kameyama T, Kadokawa Y & Marunouchi T Spatiotemporal expression pattern of Myt/NZF family zinc finger transcription factors during mouse nervous system development. Dev Dyn 243, 588– 600 (2014). 24214099
  7. [7]Masserdotti G, Gascón S & Götz M Direct neuronal reprogramming: learning from and for development. Development 143, 2494– 2510 (2016). 27436039
  8. [8]Wapinski OL Hierarchical Mechanisms for Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Neurons. Cell 155, 621– 635 (2013). 24243019 PMC3871197
  9. [10]Chanda S Generation of induced neuronal cells by the single reprogramming factor ASCL1. Stem Cell Reports 3, 282– 296 (2014). 25254342 PMC4176533
  10. [11]Jiang Y A novel family of Cys-Cys, His-Cys zinc finger transcription factors expressed in developing nervous system and pituitary gland. J Biol Chem 271, 10723– 10730 (1996). 8631881
  11. [12]Yee KS & Yu VC Isolation and characterization of a novel member of the neural zinc finger factor/myelin transcription factor family with transcriptional repression activity. J Biol Chem 273, 5366– 5374 (1998). 9478997
  12. [13]Besold AN, Oluyadi AA & Michel SLJ Switching Metal Ion Coordination and DNA Recognition in a Tandem CCHHC-type Zinc Finger Peptide. Inorg. Chem 52, 4721– 4728 (2013). 23521535 PMC3671583
  13. [14]Romm E, Nielsen JA, Kim JG & Hudson LD Myt1 family recruits histone deacetylase to regulate neural transcription. Journal of Neurochemistry 93, 1444– 1453 (2005). 15935060 PMC1201409
  14. [15]Spronk CA The Mad1-Sin3B interaction involves a novel helical fold. Nat. Struct. Biol 7, 1100– 1104 (2000). 11101889
  15. [16]Grzenda A, Lomberk G, Zhang J-S & Urrutia R Sin3: master scaffold and transcriptional corepressor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789, 443– 450 (2009). 19505602 PMC3686104
  16. [17]Vasconcelos FF MyT1 Counteracts the Neural Progenitor Program to Promote Vertebrate Neurogenesis. Cell Reports 17, 469– 483 (2016). 27705795 PMC5067283
  17. [18]Bellefroid EJ X-MyT1, a Xenopus C2HC-type zinc finger protein with a regulatory function in neuronal differentiation. Cell 87, 1191– 1202 (1996). 8980226
  18. [19]Kageyama R, Ohtsuka T, Shimojo H & Imayoshi I Dynamic Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells and a revised view of lateral inhibition. Nat. Neurosci 11, 1247– 1251 (2008). 18956012
  19. [20]Axelrod JD Delivering the lateral inhibition punchline: it’s all about the timing. Science Signaling 3, pe38– pe38 (2010). 20978236
  20. [21]De Rocker N Refinement of the critical 2p25.3 deletion region: the role of MYT1L in intellectual disability and obesity. Genet. Med 17, 460– 466 (2015). 25232846
  21. [23]Lee Y Microduplications disrupting the MYT1L gene (2p25.3) are associated with schizophrenia. Psychiatr. Genet 22, 206– 209 (2012). 22547139 PMC3384746
  22. [24]Li W Association study of myelin transcription factor 1-like polymorphisms with schizophrenia in Han Chinese population. Genes Brain Behav. 11, 87– 93 (2012). 21923761
  23. [25]Teif VB Genome-wide nucleosome positioning during embryonic stem cell development. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19, 1185– 1192 (2012). 23085715

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mall, M., Kareta, M. S., Chanda, S., Ahlenius, H., Perotti, N., Zhou, B., Grieder, S. D., Ge, X., Drake, S., Euong Ang, C., Walker, B. M., Vierbuchen, T., Fuentes, D. R., Brennecke, P., Nitta, K. R., Jolma, A., Steinmetz, L. M., Taipale, J., Südhof, T. C., & Wernig, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Wernig, Marius
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-04-05
Volume
544
Issue
7649
Pages
245-249
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2604658068
Cited by
225
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH092931)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009151)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RC4NS073015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
MYT1L, neuronal identity, lineage reprogramming, fibroblast-to-neuron conversion, SIN3B, Notch signaling, Hes1, open chromatin, epigenetic silencing, neurogenesis, rest, Groucho, transcriptional repression, neuronal differentiation, postmitotic neurons, mouse brain development, chromatin accessibility
MeSH terms
Transcription Factor HES-1, Protein Domains, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, Fibroblasts, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Organ Specificity, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Cell Lineage, Gene Silencing, Mice, Receptors, Notch, Neurogenesis, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review