The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Imaging and chromosome conformation capture studies have revealed several layers of chromosome organization, including segregation into megabase-sized active and inactive compartments, and partitioning into sub-megabase domains (TADs). It remains unclear, however, how these layers of organization form, interact with one another and influence genome function. Here we show that deletion of the cohesin-loading factor Nipbl in mouse liver leads to a marked reorganization of chromosomal folding. TADs and associated Hi-C peaks vanish globally, even in the absence of transcriptional changes. By contrast, compartmental segregation is preserved and even reinforced. Strikingly, the disappearance of TADs unmasks a finer compartment structure that accurately reflects the underlying epigenetic landscape. These observations demonstrate that the three-dimensional organization of the genome results from the interplay of two independent mechanisms: cohesin-independent segregation of the genome into fine-scale compartments, defined by chromatin state; and cohesin-dependent formation of TADs, possibly by loop extrusion, which helps to guide distant enhancers to their target genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Surprisingly however, deletion or degradation of cohesin or CTCF in differentiated cells has only mild effects on gene expression [344–349].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [348]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The A/B compartment structure does not disappear (and is in fact even strengthened) upon cohesin/CTCF depletion [344, 346–348], but, like TADs, dissolves in mitosis [459].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [348]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“complementary polymer simulation studies and Hi-C studies employing acute depletion of CTCF and cohesin, which also support such a dynamic model.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Since multiple studies show that TADs and chromatin loops disappear without CTCF10,14 and cohesin,11,13–15 we reasoned that the most stable protein of CTCF and cohesin should set an upper limit on the stability of TADs and chromatin loops.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, cohesin loss leads to disappearance of TADs because extrusion no longer takes place.11,13–15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“although CTCF and cohesin both appear absolutely required for the formation of most TADs10-15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Self-citationSTAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements
Kim, D., Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317 · Cited by 24,112
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464
Self-citationCommunity structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Self-citationTopological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project
Harrow, J., Frankish, A., Gonzalez, J. M., Tapanari, E., Diekhans, M., Kokocinski, F., Aken, B. L., Barrell, D., Zadissa, A., Searle, S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.135350.111 · Cited by 4,585
Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types
Ernst, J., Kheradpour, P., Mikkelsen, T. S., Shoresh, N., Ward, L. D., Epstein, C. B., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Issner, R., Coyne, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09906 · Cited by 2,898
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Wutz, G. et al. CTCF, WAPL and PDS5 proteins control the formation of TADs and loops by cohesin. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/18/177444 (2017) · DOI
- Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 998
Differential contribution of steady‐state RNA and active transcription in chromatin organization
Barutcu, A. R., Blencowe, B., & Rinn, J. (2019) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201948068 · Cited by 71
Lyu, X., Rowley, M. J., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.012 · Cited by 84
Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters
Ray-Jones, H., & Spivakov, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03903-w · Cited by 81
Dong, P., Tu, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., Grierson, D. S., Li, P., & Zhong, S. (2019) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12809 · Cited by 83
Activity-Induced Collapse and Arrest of Active Polymer Rings
Locatelli, E., Bianco, V., & Malgaretti, P. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.097801 · Cited by 80
CTCF and transcription influence chromatin structure re-configuration after mitosis
Zhang, H.-Y., Lam, J. C., Zhang, D., Lan, Y., Vermunt, M., Keller, C. A., Giardine, B., Hardison, R., & Blobel, G. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25418-5 · Cited by 63
Cohesion and cohesin-dependent chromatin organization
Nishiyama, T. (2018) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2018.11.006 · Cited by 83
Giraud, G., Terrone, S., & Bourgeois, C. F. (2018) · BMB Reports · doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2018.51.12.234 · Cited by 79
Spatial Genome Re-organization between Fetal and Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Chen, C., Yu, W., Tober, J. M., Gao, P., He, B., Lee, K., Trieu, T., Blobel, G. A., Speck, N. A., & Tan, K. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.065 · Cited by 79
The cohesin acetylation cycle controls chromatin loop length through a PDS5A brake mechanism
van Ruiten, M. S., van Gent, D., Cacciatore, Á. S., Fauster, A., Willems, L., Hekkelman, M. L., Hoekman, L., Altelaar, M. A. F., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Brummelkamp, T. R., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00773-z · Cited by 82
Rules of engagement for condensins and cohesins guide mitotic chromosome formation
Samejima, K., Gibcus, J. H., Abraham, S., Cisneros-Soberanis, F., Samejima, I., Beckett, A. J., Pucekova, N., Abad, M. A., Spanos, C., Medina‐Pritchard, B., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adq1709 · Cited by 78
Self-citationZhou, Y., Gerrard, D. L., Wang, J., Li, T. X., Yang, Y., Fritz, A. J., Rajendran, M., Fu, X., Stein, G. S., Schiff, R., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09320-9 · Cited by 81
Laffleur, B., Lim, J., Zhang, W., Chen, Y., Pefanis, E., Bizarro, J., Batista, C. R., Wu, L., Economides, A. N., Wang, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00772-0 · Cited by 78
A cohesin traffic pattern genetically linked to gene regulation
Valton, A.-L., Venev, S. V., Mair, B., Khokhar, E. S., Tong, A. H. Y., Ušaj, M., Chan, K., Pai, A. A., Moffat, J., & Dekker, J. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00890-9 · Cited by 79
Order and stochasticity in the folding of individual Drosophila genomes
Ulianov, S. V., Zakharova, V. V., Galitsyna, A. A., Kos, P. I., Polovnikov, K. E., Flyamer, I. M., Mikhaleva, E. A., Khrameeva, E. E., Germini, D., Logacheva, M. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20292-z · Cited by 64
Bian, Q., Anderson, E. C., Yang, Q., & Meyer, B. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002068117 · Cited by 71
Anania, C., Acemel, R. D., Jedamzick, J., Bolondi, A., Cova, G., Brieske, N., Kühn, R., Wittler, L., Real, F. M., & Lupiáñez, D. G. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01117-9 · Cited by 76
Understanding the 3D genome: Emerging impacts on human disease
Krumm, A., & Duan, Z. (2018) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.004 · Cited by 76
Sister DNA Entrapment between Juxtaposed Smc Heads and Kleisin of the Cohesin Complex
Chapard, C., Jones, R., van Oepen, T., Scheinost, J. C., & Nasmyth, K. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.023 · Cited by 78
Olfactory receptor genes make the case for inter-chromosomal interactions
Bashkirova, E., & Lomvardas, S. (2019) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2019.07.004 · Cited by 72
Zhu, Y., Denholtz, M., Lu, H., & Murre, C. (2020) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.343475.120 · Cited by 70
Specialized functions of cohesins STAG1 and STAG2 in 3D genome architecture
Cuadrado, A., & Losada, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.02.024 · Cited by 74
Highly structured homolog pairing reflects functional organization of the Drosophila genome
Abed, J. A., Erceg, J., Goloborodko, A. A., Nguyen, S. C., McCole, R. B., Saylor, W., Fudenberg, G., Lajoie, B. R., Dekker, J., Mirny, L. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12208-3 · Cited by 73
Self-citationGeneration of dynamic three-dimensional genome structure through phase separation of chromatin
Fujishiro, S., & Sasai, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109838119 · Cited by 74
Crumpled Polymer with Loops Recapitulates Key Features of Chromosome Organization
Polovnikov, K., Slavov, B., Belan, S., Imakaev, M., Brandão, H. B., & Mirny, L. A. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041029 · Cited by 77
Self-citationHigh-resolution structural genomics reveals new therapeutic vulnerabilities in glioblastomaPreprint
Johnston, M. J. G., Nikolić, A., Ninkovic, N., Guilhamon, P., Cavalli, F. M. G., Seaman, S., Zemp, F. J., Lee, J., Abdelkareem, A. O., Ellestad, K. I., et al. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.246520.118 · Cited by 68
Mammalian DNA Replication TimingPreprint
Vouzas, A. E., & Gilbert, D. M. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040162 · Cited by 71
Zhou, Q., Yu, M., Tirado-Magallanes, R., Li, B., Kong, L., Guo, M., Tan, Z. H., Lee, S., Chai, L., Numata, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20282-1 · Cited by 79
Order and disorder: abnormal 3D chromatin organization in human disease
Anania, C., & Lupiáñez, D. G. (2019) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elz028 · Cited by 74
Anopheles mosquitoes reveal new principles of 3D genome organization in insects
Lukyanchikova, V., Nuriddinov, M., Belokopytova, P. S., Taskina, A., Liang, J., Reijnders, M. J. M. F., Ruzzante, L., Feron, R., Waterhouse, R. M., Wu, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29599-5 · Cited by 76
Bastié, N., Chapard, C., Dauban, L., Gadal, O., Beckouët, F., & Koszul, R. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00780-0 · Cited by 70
Epigenomes in Cardiovascular Disease
Rosa‐Garrido, M., Chapski, D. J., & Vondriska, T. M. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.311597 · Cited by 73
Tracing DNA paths and RNA profiles in cultured cells and tissues with ORCA
Mateo, L. J., Sinnott-Armstrong, N., & Boettiger, A. N. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00478-x · Cited by 65
Chromatin jets define the properties of cohesin-driven in vivo loop extrusion.
Guo, Y., Al-Jibury, E., Garcia-Millan, R., Ntagiantas, K., King, J. W. D., Nash, A. J., Galjart, N., Lenhard, B., Rueckert, D., Fisher, A., et al. (2022) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.003 · Cited by 69
TADs: Dynamic structures to create stable regulatory functions
da Costa-Nunes, J. A., & Noordermeer, D. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102622 · Cited by 83
How the Genome Folds: The Biophysics of Four-Dimensional Chromatin Organization
Parmar, J. J., Woringer, M., & Zimmer, C. (2019) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115638 · Cited by 74
Cornelia de Lange syndrome: from molecular diagnosis to therapeutic approach
Sarogni, P., Pallotta, M. M., & Musio, A. (2019) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106277 · Cited by 76
Matthews, B. J., & Waxman, D. J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34077 · Cited by 66
Mechanisms of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions in Higher Eukaryotes
Georgiev, P. G., & Kyrchanova, O. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020671 · Cited by 72
Lamina-Dependent Stretching and Unconventional Chromosome Compartments in Early C. elegans Embryos
Sawh, A. N., Shafer, M. E. R., Su, J.-H., Zhuang, X., Wang, S., & Mango, S. E. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.006 · Cited by 65
Ivanov, M. P., Ladurner, R., Poser, I., Beveridge, R., Rampler, E., Hudecz, O., Novatchkova, M., Hèriché, J.-K., Wutz, G., van der Lelij, P., et al. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201797150 · Cited by 66
Gu, B., Comerci, C. J., McCarthy, D. G., Saurabh, S., Moerner, W. E., & Wysocka, J. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.001 · Cited by 66
BRD2 compartmentalizes the accessible genome
Xie, L., Dong, P., Qi, Y., Hsieh, T.-H. S., English, B. P., Jung, S., Chen, X., Marzio, M. D., Casellas, R. C., Chang, H. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01044-9 · Cited by 66
Signaling by Steroid Hormones in the 3D Nuclear Space
Dily, F. L., & Beato, M. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19020306 · Cited by 76
Gene regulation in the 3D genome
Li, Y., Hu, M., & Shen, Y. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy164 · Cited by 71
Pacheco-Bernal, I., Becerril-Pérez, F., & Aguilar‐Arnal, L. (2019) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-019-0677-2 · Cited by 67
Three-dimensional chromatin in disease: What holds us together and what drives us apart?
Ibrahim, D. M., & Mundlos, S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.01.003 · Cited by 70
Analysis of Genome Architecture during SCNT Reveals a Role of Cohesin in Impeding Minor ZGA
Zhang, K., Wu, D., Zheng, H., Wang, Y., Sun, Q.-R., Liu, X., Wang, L., Xiong, W., Wang, Q., Rhodes, J., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.001 · Cited by 65
Structural insights into p300 regulation and acetylation-dependent genome organisation
Ibrahim, Z., Wang, T., Destaing, O., Salvi, N., Hoghoughi, N., Chabert, C., Rusu, A., Gao, J., Feletto, L., Reynoird, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35375-2 · Cited by 64
The interdependence of gene-regulatory elements and the 3D genome
Vermunt, M. W., Zhang, D., & Blobel, G. A. (2018) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201809040 · Cited by 72
Froberg, J. E., Pinter, S. F., Kriz, A. J., Jégu, T., & Lee, J. T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07446-w · Cited by 68
Weak interactions in higher-order chromatin organization
Kantidze, O. L., & Razin, S. V. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa261 · Cited by 64
Cohesin: behind dynamic genome topology and gene expression reprogramming
Perea-Resa, C., Wattendorf, L., Marzouk, S., & Blower, M. D. (2021) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2021.03.005 · Cited by 63
Chang, L., Ghosh, S., Papale, A., Luppino, J. M., Miranda, M., Piras, V., Degrouard, J., Edouard, J., Poncelet, M., Lecouvreur, N., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41265-y · Cited by 63
CTCF organizes inter-A compartment interactions through RYBP-dependent phase separation
Wei, C., Jia, L., Huang, X., Tan, J., Wang, M., Niu, J., Hou, Y., Sun, J.-Y., Zeng, P., Wang, J., et al. (2022) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-022-00676-0 · Cited by 55
The multiple facets of the SMC1A gene
Musio, A. (2020) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2020.144612 · Cited by 62
Spatial Organization of Chromatin: Emergence of Chromatin Structure During Development
Ghosh, R. P., & Meyer, B. J. (2021) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-032321-035734 · Cited by 60
Data-Driven Polymer Model for Mechanistic Exploration of Diploid Genome Organization
Qi, Y., Reyes, A., Johnstone, S. E., Aryee, M. J., Bernstein, B., & Zhang, B. (2020) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2020.09.009 · Cited by 57
CTCF–CTCF loops and intra-TAD interactions show differential dependence on cohesin ring integrity
Liu, Y., & Dekker, J. (2022) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-022-00992-y · Cited by 74
Full circle: a brief history of cohesin and the regulation of gene expression
Horsfield, J. A. (2022) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.16362 · Cited by 57
Lee, D. P., Tan, W. L. W., Anene-Nzelu, C. G., Lee, C. J. M., Li, P. Y., Luu, T. D. A., Chan, C. X., Tiang, Z., Ng, S. L., Huang, X., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.036726 · Cited by 61
A model of active transcription hubs that unifies the roles of active promoters and enhancers
Zhu, I., Song, W., Ovcharenko, I., & Landsman, D. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab235 · Cited by 55
Viets, K., Sauria, M. E. G., Chernoff, C., Viales, R. R., Echterling, M., Anderson, C., Tran, S., Dove, A., Goyal, R., Voortman, L., et al. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.007 · Cited by 59
Higher-Order Chromosomal Structures Mediate Genome Function
Jerković, I., Szabo, Q., Bantignies, F., & Cavalli, G. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.014 · Cited by 57
Defining Functionally Relevant Spatial Chromatin Domains: It is a TAD Complicated
Sikorska, N., & Sexton, T. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.006 · Cited by 65
Engineering 3D genome organization
Wang, H., Han, M., & Qi, L. S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00325-5 · Cited by 62
Chromatin Conformation in Development and Disease
Boltsis, I., Grosveld, F. G., Giraud, G., & Kolovos, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.723859 · Cited by 59
Molecular architecture of enhancer–promoter interaction
Hamamoto, K., & Fukaya, T. (2022) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2022.01.003 · Cited by 58
Cavalheiro, G. R., Girardot, C., Viales, R. R., Feng, S., Pollex, T., Cao, T. B. N., Lacour, P., Rabinowitz, A. H., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade1085 · Cited by 59
Chromatin topology and the timing of enhancer function at the HoxD locus
Rodríguez-Carballo, E., Lopez‐Delisle, L., Willemin, A., Beccari, L. L., Gitto, S., Mascrez, B., & Duboule, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2015083117 · Cited by 54
Topologically Associating Domains and Regulatory Landscapes in Development, Evolution and Disease
Tena, J. J., & Santos-Pereira, J. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.702787 · Cited by 65
Regulating specificity in enhancer–promoter communication
Galouzis, C. C., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2022.01.010 · Cited by 61
Reed, K. S. M., Davis, E. S., Bond, M. L., Cabrera, A., Thulson, E., Quiroga, I. Y., Cassel, S., Woolery, K. T., Hilton, I. B., Won, H., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111567 · Cited by 56
NIPBL and cohesin: new take on a classic tale
Gil, D. A., & Losada, A. (2023) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2023.03.006 · Cited by 56
Račko, D., Benedetti, F., Dorier, J., & Stasiak, A. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1091 · Cited by 58
Bauer, M., Vidal, E., Zorita, E. V., Üresin, N., Pinter, S. F., Filion, G. J. P., & Payer, B. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23610-1 · Cited by 54
Activation of Clustered IFNγ Target Genes Drives Cohesin-Controlled Transcriptional Memory
Siwek, W., Tehrani, S., Mata, J. F., & Jansen, L. E. T. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.005 · Cited by 60
Soochit, W., Sleutels, F., Stik, G., Bartkuhn, M., Basu, S., Hernández, S. C., Merzouk, S., Vidal, E., Boers, R., Boers, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-021-00722-w · Cited by 55
Chromatinopathies: A focus on Cornelia de Lange syndrome
Avagliano, L., Parenti, I., Grazioli, P., Fede, E. D., Parodi, C., Mariani, M., Kaiser, F. J., Selicorni, A., Gervasini, C., & Massa, V. (2019) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/cge.13674 · Cited by 57
The chromatin remodeling enzyme Chd4 regulates genome architecture in the mouse brain
Goodman, J. V., Yamada, T., Yang, Y., Kong, L., Wu, D. Y., Zhao, G., Gabel, H. W., & Bonni, A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17065-z · Cited by 57
Chromatin architecture reorganization during neuronal cell differentiation in Drosophila genomePreprint
Chathoth, K. T., & Zabet, N. R. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.246710.118 · Cited by 56
Taylor, T., Sikorska, N., Shchuka, V. M., Chahar, S., Ji, C., Macpherson, N. N., Moorthy, S. D., de Kort, M. A. C., Mullany, S., Khader, N., et al. (2022) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.349489.122 · Cited by 45
ZNF143 is a regulator of chromatin loop
Wen, Z., Huang, Z.-T., Zhang, R., & Peng, C. (2018) · Cell Biology and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s10565-018-9443-z · Cited by 41
Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
Srirattana, K., Kaneda, M., & Parnpai, R. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23041969 · Cited by 59
ATP, Mg2+, Nuclear Phase Separation, and Genome Accessibility
Wright, R. H. G., Dily, F. L., & Beato, M. (2019) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2019.03.001 · Cited by 54
Anderson, E. C., Frankino, P. A., Higuchi‐Sanabria, R., Yang, Q., Bian, Q., Podshivalova, K., Shin, A., Kenyon, C. J., Dillin, A. G., & Meyer, B. J. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.08.004 · Cited by 51
Amat, R., Böttcher, R., Dily, F. L., Vidal, E., Quilez, J., Cuartero, Y., Beato, M., de Nadal, E., & Posas, F. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.238527.118 · Cited by 58
Three-dimensional organization and dynamics of the genome
Szałaj, P., & Plewczyński, D. (2018) · Cell Biology and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s10565-018-9428-y · Cited by 59
Hildebrand, E. M., Polovnikov, K., Dekker, B., Liu, Y., Lafontaine, D. L. J., Fox, A. N., Li, Y., Venev, S. V., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.02.025 · Cited by 55
Self-citation3D genome organization: a role for phase separation and loop extrusion?
Stam, M. E., Tark‐Dame, M., & Fransz, P. F. (2019) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.008 · Cited by 54
Arruda, N. L., Carico, Z. M., Justice, M., Liu, Y. F., Zhou, J., Stefan, H. C., & Dowen, J. M. (2020) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-020-00353-9 · Cited by 52
Shaping the genome via lengthwise compaction, phase separation, and lamina adhesion
Brahmachari, S., Contessoto, V. G., Pierro, M. D., & Onuchic, J. N. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac231 · Cited by 47
Constricted migration is associated with stable 3D genome structure differences in cancer cells
Golloshi, R., Playter, C., Freeman, T. F., Das, P., Raines, T. I., Garretson, J. H., Thurston, D., & McCord, R. P. (2022) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202052149 · Cited by 53
Challenges and guidelines toward 4D nucleome data and model standards
Martí-Renom, M. A., Almouzni, G., Bickmore, W. A., Bystricky, K., Cavalli, G., Fraser, P., Gasser, S. M., Giorgetti, L., Heard, É., Nicodemi, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0236-3 · Cited by 53
de Wit, E. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.09.026 · Cited by 57
Physical and data structure of 3D genome
Huang, K., Li, Y., Shim, A. R., Nap, R. J., Agrawal, V., Virk, R. K. A., Eshein, A., Almassalha, L. M., Backman, V., & Szleifer, I. G. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay4055 · Cited by 54
Cohesin Causes Replicative DNA Damage by Trapping DNA Topological Stress
Minchell, N. E., Keszthelyi, A., & Baxter, J. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.013 · Cited by 54
Super-Enhancers, Phase-Separated Condensates, and 3D Genome Organization in Cancer
Tang, S. C., Vijayakumar, U., Zhang, Y., & Fullwood, M. J. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14122866 · Cited by 56
Multiscale 3D genome reorganization during skeletal muscle stem cell lineage progression and aging
Zhao, Y. F., Ding, Y., He, L., Zhou, Q., Chen, X., Li, Y., Alfonsi, M. V., Wu, Z., Sun, H., & Wang, H. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo1360 · Cited by 56
Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms
Nagasaka, K., Davidson, I. F., Stocsits, R. R., Tang, W., Wutz, G., Batty, P., Panarotto, M., Litos, G., Schleiffer, A., Gerlich, D. W., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.024 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarzer, W., Abdennur, N., Goloborodko, A., Pekowska, A., Fudenberg, G., Loe-Mie, Y., Fonseca, N. A., Huber, W., Haering, C. H., Mirny, L., & Spitz, F.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mirny, Leonid
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-09-27
- Volume
- 551
- Issue
- 7678
- Pages
- 51-56
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC5687303
- OpenAlex
- W2757387674
- Cited by
- 1,196
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 32
- FWCI
- 51.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1504942)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- European Commission (305626)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1331/3-1, SP 1331/3-1)
- National Institutes of Health (DK 107980)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114190)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107980)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- chromatin organization, topologically associating domains, cohesin, NIPBL, loop extrusion, enhancer-promoter interactions, 3D genome organization, chromatin state, CTCF, interphase chromosomes, hepatocytes, genome compartmentalization
- MeSH terms
- Cohesins, Animals, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Liver, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Cell Cycle Proteins, Epigenesis, Genetic, Chromosome Positioning, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
