The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Imaging and chromosome conformation capture studies have revealed several layers of chromosome organization, including segregation into megabase-sized active and inactive compartments, and partitioning into sub-megabase domains (TADs). It remains unclear, however, how these layers of organization form, interact with one another and influence genome function. Here we show that deletion of the cohesin-loading factor Nipbl in mouse liver leads to a marked reorganization of chromosomal folding. TADs and associated Hi-C peaks vanish globally, even in the absence of transcriptional changes. By contrast, compartmental segregation is preserved and even reinforced. Strikingly, the disappearance of TADs unmasks a finer compartment structure that accurately reflects the underlying epigenetic landscape. These observations demonstrate that the three-dimensional organization of the genome results from the interplay of two independent mechanisms: cohesin-independent segregation of the genome into fine-scale compartments, defined by chromatin state; and cohesin-dependent formation of TADs, possibly by loop extrusion, which helps to guide distant enhancers to their target genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Surprisingly however, deletion or degradation of cohesin or CTCF in differentiated cells has only mild effects on gene expression [344–349].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [348]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The A/B compartment structure does not disappear (and is in fact even strengthened) upon cohesin/CTCF depletion [344, 346–348], but, like TADs, dissolves in mitosis [459].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [348]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“complementary polymer simulation studies and Hi-C studies employing acute depletion of CTCF and cohesin, which also support such a dynamic model.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Since multiple studies show that TADs and chromatin loops disappear without CTCF10,14 and cohesin,11,13–15 we reasoned that the most stable protein of CTCF and cohesin should set an upper limit on the stability of TADs and chromatin loops.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, cohesin loss leads to disappearance of TADs because extrusion no longer takes place.11,13–15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“although CTCF and cohesin both appear absolutely required for the formation of most TADs10-15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Self-citationSTAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements
Kim, D., Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317 · Cited by 24,112
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464
Self-citationCommunity structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Self-citationTopological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project
Harrow, J., Frankish, A., Gonzalez, J. M., Tapanari, E., Diekhans, M., Kokocinski, F., Aken, B. L., Barrell, D., Zadissa, A., Searle, S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.135350.111 · Cited by 4,585
Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types
Ernst, J., Kheradpour, P., Mikkelsen, T. S., Shoresh, N., Ward, L. D., Epstein, C. B., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Issner, R., Coyne, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09906 · Cited by 2,898
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 · Cited by 2,430
Self-citationDisruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions
Lupiáñez, D. G., Kraft, K., Heinrich, V., Krawitz, P., Brancati, F., Klopocki, E., Horn, D., Kayserili, H., Opitz, J. M., Laxova, R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 · Cited by 2,132
Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion
Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Lu, C., Goloborodko, A., Abdennur, N., & Mirny, L. A. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085 · Cited by 2,003
Self-citationThree-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome
Sexton, T., Yaffe, E., Kenigsberg, E., Bantignies, F., Leblanc, B., Hoichman, M., Parrinello, H., Tanay, A., & Cavalli, G. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,983
Cohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains
Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Glenn St Hilaire, B., Engreitz, J. M., Perez, E. M., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Sanborn, A. L., Johnstone, S. E., Bascom, G. D., Bochkov, I. D., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.026 · Cited by 1,883
A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome
Yue, F., Cheng, Y., Breschi, A., Vierstra, J., Wu, W., Ryba, T., Sandstrom, R., Ma, Z., Davis, C., Pope, B. D., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13992 · Cited by 1,781
Sanborn, A. L., Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Durand, N. C., Huntley, M. H., Jewett, A. I., Bochkov, I. D., Chinnappan, D., Cutkosky, A., Li, J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518552112 · Cited by 1,730
Nora, E. P., Goloborodko, A., Valton, A.-L., Gibcus, J. H., Uebersohn, A., Abdennur, N., Dekker, J., Mirny, L. A., & Bruneau, B. G. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.004 · Cited by 1,709
Self-citationIterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization
Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., McCord, R. P., Naumova, N., Goloborodko, A., Lajoie, B. R., Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2148 · Cited by 1,423
A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome
Shen, Y., Yue, F., McCleary, D. F., Ye, Z., Edsall, L., Kuan, S., Wagner, U., Dixon, J., Lee, L., Lobanenkov, V. V., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11243 · Cited by 1,361
Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor
Wendt, K. S., Yoshida, K., Itoh, T., Bando, M., Koch, B., Schirghuber, E., Tsutsumi, S., Nagae, G., Ishihara, K., Mishiro, T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06634 · Cited by 1,193
Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment
Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Sauria, M. E. G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T. I., Lajoie, B. R., Bell, J. S. K., Ong, C.-T., Hookway, T. A., Guo, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 · Cited by 1,187
Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: Interpreting chromatin interaction data
Dekker, J., Marti-Renom, M. A., & Mirny, L. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3454 · Cited by 1,068
Self-citationMolecular Maps of the Reorganization of Genome-Nuclear Lamina Interactions during Differentiation
Peric-Hupkes, D., Meuleman, W., Pagie, L., Bruggeman, S. W. M., Solovei, I., Brugman, W., Gräf, S., Flicek, P., Kerkhoven, R. M., van Lohuizen, M., et al. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016 · Cited by 1,050
Expression of Cre recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer
Logan, M., Martin, J. F., Nagy, A., Lobe, C., Olson, E., & Tabin, C. (2002) · Genesis · doi:10.1002/gene.10092 · Cited by 1,022
Cohesin: Its Roles and Mechanisms
Nasmyth, K., & Haering, C. H. (2009) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233 · Cited by 1,015
Self-citationOrganization of the mitotic chromosome
Naumova, N., Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., Zhan, Y., Lajoie, B. R., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236083 · Cited by 976
Self-citationCRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function
Guo, Y., Xu, Q., Canzio, D., Shou, J., Li, J., Gorkin, D. U., Jung, I., Wu, H., Zhai, Y., Tang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038 · Cited by 958
The 3D Genome as Moderator of Chromosomal Communication
Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.007 · Cited by 937
Self-citationCohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms
Parelho, V., Hadjur, S., Spivakov, M., Leleu, M., Sauer, S., Gregson, H. C., Jarmuz, A., Canzonetta, C., Webster, Z., Nesterova, T., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.011 · Cited by 900
Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes
Dowen, J. M., Fan, Z. P., Hnisz, D., Ren, G., Abraham, B. J., Zhang, L. N., Weintraub, A. S., Schuijers, J., Lee, T. I., Zhao, K., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.030 · Cited by 884
Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states
Boettiger, A. N., Bintu, B., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S., Beliveau, B. J., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Mirny, L. A., Wu, C.-T., & Zhuang, X. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16496 · Cited by 871
Self-citationA compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome
Schmitt, A. D., Hu, M., Jung, I., Xu, Z., Qiu, Y., Tan, C. L., Li, Y., Lin, S., Lin, Y., Barr, C. L., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.061 · Cited by 866
Wutz, G., Várnai, C., Nagasaka, K., Cisneros, D. A., Stocsits, R. R., Tang, W., Schoenfelder, S., Jessberger, G., Muhar, M., Hossain, M. J., et al. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798004 · Cited by 864
Chromatin Domains: The Unit of Chromosome Organization
Dixon, J. R., Gorkin, D. U., & Ren, B. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.018 · Cited by 811
The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension
Haarhuis, J. H. I., van der Weide, R. H., Blomen, V. A., Yáñez-Cuna, J. O., Amendola, M., van Ruiten, M. S., Krijger, P. H. L., Teunissen, H., Medema, R. H., van Steensel, B., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.013 · Cited by 793
Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells
Zuin, J., Dixon, J. R., van der Reijden, M. I. J. A., Ye, Z., Kolovos, P., Brouwer, R. W. W., van de Corput, M. P. C., van de Werken, H. J. G., Knoch, T. A., van IJcken, W. F. J., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317788111 · Cited by 779
Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition
Flyamer, I. M., Gassler, J., Imakaev, M., Brandão, H. B., Ulianov, S. V., Abdennur, N., Razin, S. V., Mirny, L. A., & Tachibana-Konwalski, K. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21711 · Cited by 753
Self-citationThe Hierarchy of the 3D Genome
Gibcus, J. H., & Dekker, J. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011 · Cited by 727
Genome Architecture: Domain Organization of Interphase Chromosomes
Bickmore, W. A., & van Steensel, B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001 · Cited by 725
Eastman, P. K., Friedrichs, M. S., Chodera, J. D., Radmer, R. J., Bruns, C. M., Ku, J. P., Beauchamp, K. A., Lane, T. J., Wang, L., Shukla, D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300857j · Cited by 695
Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture
Vietri Rudan, M., Barrington, C., Henderson, S., Ernst, C., Odom, D. T., Tanay, A., & Hadjur, S. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004 · Cited by 680
CTCF Binding Polarity Determines Chromatin Looping
de Wit, E., Vos, E. S. M., Holwerda, S. J. B., Valdes-Quezada, C., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Teunissen, H., Splinter, E., Wijchers, P. J., Krijger, P. H. L., & de Laat, W. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.023 · Cited by 641
Schmidt, D., Schwalie, P. C., Wilson, M. D., Ballester, B., Gonçalves, Â., Kutter, C., Brown, G. D., Marshall, A., Flicek, P., & Odom, D. T. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.058 · Cited by 620
Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F., & Chen, L. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2057 · Cited by 554
CTCF and Cohesin in Genome Folding and Transcriptional Gene Regulation
Merkenschlager, M., & Nora, E. P. (2016) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022339 · Cited by 528
Meuleman, W., Peric-Hupkes, D., Kind, J., Beaudry, J.-B., Pagie, L., Kellis, M., Reinders, M., Wessels, L., & van Steensel, B. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.141028.112 · Cited by 462
Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains
Symmons, O., Uslu, V. V., Tsujimura, T., Ruf, S., Nassari, S., Schwarzer, W., Ettwiller, L., & Spitz, F. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.163519.113 · Cited by 455
Self-citationThe Hitchhiker’s guide to Hi-C analysis: Practical guidelines
Lajoie, B. R., Dekker, J., & Kaplan, N. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.10.031 · Cited by 394
Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture
Sofueva, S., Yaffe, E., Chan, W., Georgopoulou, D., Vietri Rudan, M., Mira‐Bontenbal, H., Pollard, S. M., Schroth, G. P., Tanay, A., & Hadjur, S. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.237 · Cited by 394
A mechanism of cohesin‐dependent loop extrusion organizes zygotic genome architecture
Gassler, J., Brandão, H. B., Imakaev, M., Flyamer, I. M., Ladstätter, S., Bickmore, W. A., Peters, J., Mirny, L. A., & Tachibana, K.-E. K. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798083 · Cited by 382
Self-citationFraser, J., Ferrai, C., Chiariello, A. M., Schueler, M., Rito, T., Laudanno, G., Barbieri, M., Moore, B. L., Kraemer, D., Aitken, S., et al. (2015) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20156492 · Cited by 372
Gerlich, D. W., Koch, B., Dupeux, F., Peters, J., & Ellenberg, J. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.068 · Cited by 362
Wapl is an essential regulator of chromatin structure and chromosome segregation
Tedeschi, A., Wutz, G., Huet, S., Jaritz, M., Wuensche, A., Schirghuber, E., Davidson, I. F., Tang, W., Cisneros, D. A., Bhaskara, V., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12471 · Cited by 359
CTCF and Cohesin: Linking Gene Regulatory Elements with Their Targets
Merkenschlager, M., & Odom, D. T. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.029 · Cited by 345
Seitan, V. C., Faure, A. J., Zhan, Y., McCord, R. P., Lajoie, B. R., Ing-Simmons, E., Lenhard, B., Giorgetti, L., Heard, E., Fisher, A. G., et al. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.161620.113 · Cited by 318
Compaction and segregation of sister chromatids via active loop extrusion
Goloborodko, A. A., Imakaev, M., Marko, J. F., & Mirny, L. A. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.14864 · Cited by 317
Self-citationIsolation and Culture of Adult Mouse Hepatocytes
Li, W., Ralphs, K. L., & Tosh, D. (2010) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-019-5_13 · Cited by 303
The condensin complex is a mechanochemical motor that translocates along DNA
Terakawa, T., Bisht, S., Eeftens, J., Dekker, C., Haering, C., & Greene, E. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan6516 · Cited by 269
Self-citationKawauchi, S., Calof, A. L., Santos, R., Lopez‐Burks, M. E., Young, C. M., Hoang, M. P., Chua, A., Lao, T., Lechner, M. S., Daniel, J. A., et al. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000650 · Cited by 243
Identification of alternative topological domains in chromatin
Filippova, D., Patro, R., Duggal, G., & Kingsford, C. (2014) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1748-7188-9-14 · Cited by 224
Symmons, O., Pan, L., Remeseiro, S., Aktas, T., Klein, F., Huber, W., & Spitz, F. (2016) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.10.015 · Cited by 222
Self-citationSegmental folding of chromosomes: A basis for structural and regulatory chromosomal neighborhoods?
Nora, E. P., Dekker, J., & Heard, É. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300040 · Cited by 187
A cre/loxP‐deleter transgenic line in mouse strain 129S1/SvImJ
Tang, S.-H. E., Silva, F. J., Tsark, W. M. K., & Mann, J. R. (2002) · genesis · doi:10.1002/gene.10030 · Cited by 173
Hu, B., Petela, N. J., Kurze, A., Chan, K., Chapard, C., & Nasmyth, K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv670 · Cited by 162
Efficient nonbonded interactions for molecular dynamics on a graphics processing unit
Eastman, P. K., & Pande, V. S. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21413 · Cited by 142
Scc2/Nipbl hops between chromosomal cohesin rings after loading
Rhodes, J., Mazza, D., Nasmyth, K., & Uphoff, S. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.30000 · Cited by 102
Standardizing chromatin research: a simple and universal method for ChIP-seq
Arrigoni, L., Richter, A. S., Betancourt, E., Bruder, K., Diehl, S., Manke, T., & Bönisch, U. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1495 · Cited by 99
Cohesin in development and disease
Remeseiro, S., Cuadrado, A., & Losada, A. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.090605 · Cited by 87
Improved isolation of murine hepatocytes for in vitro malaria liver stage studies
Gonçalves, L. A., Vigário, A. M., & Penha‐Gonçalves, C. (2007) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2875-6-169 · Cited by 86
Tannour‐Louet, M., Porteu, A., Vaulont, S., Kahn, A., & Vasseur-Cognet, M. (2002) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2002.33164 · Cited by 78
Chromatin and RNA Maps Reveal Regulatory Long Noncoding RNAs in Mouse
Bogu, G. K., Vizán, P., Stanton, L. W., Beato, M., Croce, L. D., & Martı́-Renom, M. A. (2015) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00955-15 · Cited by 76
Effects of topological constraints on globular polymers
Imakaev, M., Tchourine, K. M., Nechaev, S., & Mirny, L. A. (2014) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c4sm02099e · Cited by 67
Self-citationTsujimura, T., Klein, F. A., Langenfeld, K., Glaser, J., Huber, W. K., & Spitz, F. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004897 · Cited by 64
Self-citationHiGlass: Web-based Visual Exploration and Analysis of Genome Interaction MapsPreprint
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/121889 · Cited by 43
Self-citationNolen, L. D., Boyle, S., Ansari, M., Pritchard, E., & Bickmore, W. A. (2013) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt265 · Cited by 38
Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregationPreprint
Nuebler, J., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Abdennur, N. A., & Mirny, L. A. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/196261 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Wutz, G. et al. CTCF, WAPL and PDS5 proteins control the formation of TADs and loops by cohesin. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/18/177444 (2017) · DOI
- Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 · Cited by 2,430
Self-citationCohesin Loss Eliminates All Loop Domains
Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Glenn St Hilaire, B., Engreitz, J. M., Perez, E. M., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Sanborn, A. L., Johnstone, S. E., Bascom, G. D., Bochkov, I. D., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.026 · Cited by 1,883
Nora, E. P., Goloborodko, A., Valton, A.-L., Gibcus, J. H., Uebersohn, A., Abdennur, N., Dekker, J., Mirny, L. A., & Bruneau, B. G. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.004 · Cited by 1,709
Self-citationOrganizational principles of 3D genome architecture
Rowley, M. J., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0060-8 · Cited by 1,171
Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control
Schoenfelder, S., & Fraser, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 · Cited by 1,102
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarzer, W., Abdennur, N., Goloborodko, A., Pekowska, A., Fudenberg, G., Loe-Mie, Y., Fonseca, N. A., Huber, W., Haering, C. H., Mirny, L., & Spitz, F.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mirny, Leonid
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-09-27
- Volume
- 551
- Issue
- 7678
- Pages
- 51-56
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC5687303
- OpenAlex
- W2757387674
- Cited by
- 1,196
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 32
- FWCI
- 51.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1504942)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- European Commission (305626)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1331/3-1, SP 1331/3-1)
- National Institutes of Health (DK 107980)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114190)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107980)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- chromatin organization, topologically associating domains, cohesin, NIPBL, loop extrusion, enhancer-promoter interactions, 3D genome organization, chromatin state, CTCF, interphase chromosomes, hepatocytes, genome compartmentalization
- MeSH terms
- Cohesins, Animals, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Liver, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Cell Cycle Proteins, Epigenesis, Genetic, Chromosome Positioning, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
