The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Imaging and chromosome conformation capture studies have revealed several layers of chromosome organization, including segregation into megabase-sized active and inactive compartments, and partitioning into sub-megabase domains (TADs). It remains unclear, however, how these layers of organization form, interact with one another and influence genome function. Here we show that deletion of the cohesin-loading factor Nipbl in mouse liver leads to a marked reorganization of chromosomal folding. TADs and associated Hi-C peaks vanish globally, even in the absence of transcriptional changes. By contrast, compartmental segregation is preserved and even reinforced. Strikingly, the disappearance of TADs unmasks a finer compartment structure that accurately reflects the underlying epigenetic landscape. These observations demonstrate that the three-dimensional organization of the genome results from the interplay of two independent mechanisms: cohesin-independent segregation of the genome into fine-scale compartments, defined by chromatin state; and cohesin-dependent formation of TADs, possibly by loop extrusion, which helps to guide distant enhancers to their target genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Surprisingly however, deletion or degradation of cohesin or CTCF in differentiated cells has only mild effects on gene expression [344–349].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [348]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The A/B compartment structure does not disappear (and is in fact even strengthened) upon cohesin/CTCF depletion [344, 346–348], but, like TADs, dissolves in mitosis [459].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [348]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“complementary polymer simulation studies and Hi-C studies employing acute depletion of CTCF and cohesin, which also support such a dynamic model.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Since multiple studies show that TADs and chromatin loops disappear without CTCF10,14 and cohesin,11,13–15 we reasoned that the most stable protein of CTCF and cohesin should set an upper limit on the stability of TADs and chromatin loops.”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, cohesin loss leads to disappearance of TADs because extrusion no longer takes place.11,13–15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“although CTCF and cohesin both appear absolutely required for the formation of most TADs10-15”
From Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Self-citationSTAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements
Kim, D., Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317 · Cited by 24,112
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464
Self-citationCommunity structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212
Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898
Self-citationTopological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
GENCODE: The reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project
Harrow, J., Frankish, A., Gonzalez, J. M., Tapanari, E., Diekhans, M., Kokocinski, F., Aken, B. L., Barrell, D., Zadissa, A., Searle, S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.135350.111 · Cited by 4,585
Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types
Ernst, J., Kheradpour, P., Mikkelsen, T. S., Shoresh, N., Ward, L. D., Epstein, C. B., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Issner, R., Coyne, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09906 · Cited by 2,898
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Wutz, G. et al. CTCF, WAPL and PDS5 proteins control the formation of TADs and loops by cohesin. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/08/18/177444 (2017) · DOI
- Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 998
Stik, G., Vidal, E., Barrero, M., Cuartero, S., Vila-Casadesús, M., Mendieta-Esteban, J., Tian, T. V., Choi, J., Berenguer, C., Abad, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0643-0 · Cited by 143
Genome control by SMC complexes
Hoencamp, C., & Rowland, B. D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00609-8 · Cited by 147
Editing the Epigenome: Reshaping the Genomic Landscape
Holtzman, L., & Gersbach, C. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021632 · Cited by 147
Diverse silent chromatin states modulate genome compartmentalization and loop extrusion barriers
Spracklin, G., Abdennur, N. A., Imakaev, M., Chowdhury, N., Pradhan, S., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00892-7 · Cited by 144
Self-citationRNA polymerases as moving barriers to condensin loop extrusion
Brandão, H. B., Paul, P., van den Berg, A. A., Rudner, D. Z., Wang, X., & Mirny, L. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1907009116 · Cited by 143
Self-citationWapl repression by Pax5 promotes V gene recombination by Igh loop extrusion
Hill, L., Ebert, A., Jaritz, M., Wutz, G., Nagasaka, K., Tagoh, H., Kostanova‐Poliakova, D., Schindler, K., Sun, Q., Bönelt, P., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2454-y · Cited by 143
FISH-ing for captured contacts: towards reconciling FISH and 3C
Fudenberg, G., & Imakaev, M. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4329 · Cited by 141
Self-citationLiquid chromatin Hi-C characterizes compartment-dependent chromatin interaction dynamics
Belaghzal, H., Borrman, T. M., Stephens, A. D., Lafontaine, D. L. J., Venev, S. V., Weng, Z., Marko, J. F., & Dekker, J. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00784-4 · Cited by 136
Developing in 3D: the role of CTCF in cell differentiation
Arzate‐Mejía, R. G., Targa, F. R., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.137729 · Cited by 144
Three-dimensional chromatin packing and positioning of plant genomes
Doğan, E. S., & Liu, C. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0199-5 · Cited by 147
Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations
Williamson, I., Kane, L., Devenney, P. S., Flyamer, I. M., Anderson, E., Kilanowski, F. M., Hill, R. E., Bickmore, W. A., & Lettice, L. A. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.179523 · Cited by 148
Determining cellular CTCF and cohesin abundances to constrain 3D genome models
Cattoglio, C., Pustova, I., Walther, N., Ho, J. J., Hantsche-Grininger, M., Inouye, C. J., Hossain, M. J., Dailey, G. M., Ellenberg, J., Darzacq, X., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40164 · Cited by 133
Conte, M., Fiorillo, L., Bianco, S., Chiariello, A. M., Esposito, A., & Nicodemi, M. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17141-4 · Cited by 130
Ulianov, S. V., Velichko, A. K., Magnitov, M. D., Luzhin, A. V., Golov, A. K., Ovsyannikova, N., Kireev, I. I., Gavrikov, A. S., Mishin, A. S., Garaev, A. K., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab249 · Cited by 137
Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair effects on 3D genome organization
Sanders, J. T., Freeman, T. F., Xu, Y., Golloshi, R., Stallard, M. A., Hill, A. M., San Martin, R., Balajee, A. S., & McCord, R. P. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20047-w · Cited by 134
Extensile motor activity drives coherent motions in a model of interphase chromatin
Saintillan, D., Shelley, M., & Zidovska, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1807073115 · Cited by 134
Principles of meiotic chromosome assembly revealed in S. cerevisiae
Schalbetter, S. A., Fudenberg, G., Baxter, J., Pollard, K. S., & Neale, M. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12629-0 · Cited by 140
Self-citationBRD4 interacts with NIPBL and BRD4 is mutated in a Cornelia de Lange–like syndrome
Study, D. D. D., Olley, G., Ansari, M., Bengani, H., Grimes, G. R., Rhodes, J., von Kriegsheim, A., Blatnik, A., Stewart, F. J., Wakeling, E. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0042-y · Cited by 136
Cohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length
Calderon, L., Weiss, F. D., Beagan, J. A., Oliveira, M. S., Georgieva, R., Wang, Y.-F., Carroll, T. S., Dharmalingam, G., Gong, W., Tossell, K., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76539 · Cited by 132
The three-dimensional genome: regulating gene expression during pluripotency and development
Andrey, G., & Mundlos, S. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.148304 · Cited by 134
Cohesin-mediated loop anchors confine the locations of human replication origins
Emerson, D. J., Zhao, P. A., Cook, A. L., Barnett, R. J., Klein, K. N., Saulebekova, D., Ge, C., Zhou, L., Simándi, Z., Minsk, M. K., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04803-0 · Cited by 137
CTCF shapes chromatin structure and gene expression in health and disease
Dehingia, B., Milewska, M., Janowski, M., & Pękowska, A. (2022) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202255146 · Cited by 141
Luppino, J. M., Park, D. S., Nguyen, S. C., Lan, Y., Xu, Z., Yunker, R., & Joyce, E. F. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0647-9 · Cited by 122
The chromosome folding problem and how cells solve it
Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.026 · Cited by 112
Self-citationPredicting three-dimensional genome organization with chromatin states
Qi, Y., & Zhang, B. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007024 · Cited by 123
The Mediator complex regulates enhancer-promoter interactions
Ramasamy, S., Aljahani, A., Karpińska, M. A., Cao, T. B. N., Velychko, T., Cruz, J. N., Lidschreiber, M., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01027-2 · Cited by 141
Mitotic Chromosome Mechanics: How Cells Segregate Their Genome
Batty, P., & Gerlich, D. W. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.05.007 · Cited by 121
Loop stacking organizes genome folding from TADs to chromosomes
Hafner, A., Park, M., Berger, S. E., Murphy, S. E., Nora, E. P., & Boettiger, A. N. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.04.008 · Cited by 126
CTCF-Binding Elements Mediate Accessibility of RAG Substrates During Chromatin Scanning
Jain, S., Ba, Z., Zhang, Y., Dai, H., & Alt, F. W. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.035 · Cited by 122
BET inhibition disrupts transcription but retains enhancer-promoter contact
Crump, N. T., Ballabio, E., Godfrey, L., Thorne, R., Repapi, E., Kerry, J., Tapia, M., Hua, P., Lagerholm, C., Filippakopoulos, P., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20400-z · Cited by 123
Principles of Chromosome Architecture Revealed by Hi-C
Eagen, K. P. (2018) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2018.03.006 · Cited by 120
Gdula, M. R., Nesterova, T. B., Pintacuda, G., Godwin, J., Zhan, Y., Özadam, H., McClellan, M. W., Moralli, D., Krueger, F., Green, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07907-2 · Cited by 119
Rowley, M. J., Lyu, X., Rana, V., Ando‐Kuri, M., Karns, R., Bosco, G., & Corces, V. G. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.116 · Cited by 114
Aljahani, A., Hua, P., Karpinska, M. A., Quililan, K., Davies, J. O. J., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29696-5 · Cited by 121
Cook, P. R., & Marenduzzo, D. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky763 · Cited by 117
CTCF orchestrates long-range cohesin-driven V(D)J recombinational scanning
Ba, Z., Lou, J., Ye, A. Y., Dai, H., Dring, E. W., Lin, S. G., Jain, S., Kyritsis, N., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., Casellas, R. C., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2578-0 · Cited by 115
Cancer-specific CTCF binding facilitates oncogenic transcriptional dysregulation
Fang, C., Wang, Z., Han, C., Safgren, S. L., Helmin, K. A., Adelman, E. R., Serafin, V., Basso, G., Eagen, K. P., Gaspar‐Maia, A., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02152-7 · Cited by 120
Chakraborty, S., Kopitchinski, N., Zuo, Z., Eraso, A., Awasthi, P., Chari, R., Mitra, A., Tobias, I. C., Moorthy, S. D., Dale, R. K., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01295-6 · Cited by 120
Looping the Genome with SMC Complexes
Kim, E., Barth, R., & Dekker, C. (2023) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-032620-110506 · Cited by 96
X-linked intellectual disability update 2017
Neri, G., Schwartz, C. E., Lubs, H. A., & Stevenson, R. E. (2018) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.38710 · Cited by 117
Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cells
Holzmann, J., Politi, A. Z., Nagasaka, K., Hantsche-Grininger, M., Walther, N., Koch, B., Fuchs, J., Dürnberger, G., Tang, W., Ladurner, R., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46269 · Cited by 113
Physical and Functional Compartmentalization of Archaeal Chromosomes
Takemata, N., Samson, R. Y., & Bell, S. D. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.036 · Cited by 116
TOP1 inhibition therapy protects against SARS-CoV-2-induced lethal inflammation
Ho, J., Mok, B. W.-Y., Campisi, L., Jordan, T. X., Yildiz, S., Parameswaran, S., Wayman, J. A., Gaudreault, N. N., Meekins, D. A., Indran, S. V., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.051 · Cited by 121
Conformation of sister chromatids in the replicated human genome
Mitter, M., Gasser, C., Takács, Z., Langer, C. C. H., Tang, W., Jessberger, G., Beales, C. T., Neuner, E., Ameres, S. L., Peters, J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2744-4 · Cited by 111
Self-citationCTCF and R-loops are boundaries of cohesin-mediated DNA looping
Zhang, H., Shi, Z., Banigan, E. J., Kim, Y., Yu, H., Bai, X., & Finkelstein, I. J. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.006 · Cited by 123
Emerging themes in cohesin cancer biology
Waldman, T. A. (2020) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0270-1 · Cited by 117
Liu, Y., Nanni, L., Sungalee, S., Zufferey, M., Tavernari, D., Mina, M., Ceri, S., Oricchio, E., & Ciriello, G. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22666-3 · Cited by 112
Cohesin residency determines chromatin loop patterns
Costantino, L., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Lamothe, R. C., Darzacq, X., & Koshland, D. E. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59889 · Cited by 125
The role of chromatin loop extrusion in antibody diversification
Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Dai, H., Hu, H., & Alt, F. W. (2022) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00679-3 · Cited by 106
Barrington, C., Georgopoulou, D., Pezic, D., Varsally, W., Herrero, J., & Hadjur, S. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10725-9 · Cited by 102
Laugsch, M., Bartusel, M., Rehimi, R., Alirzayeva, H., Karaolidou, A., Crispatzu, G., Zentis, P., Nikolić, M., Bleckwehl, T., Kolovos, P., et al. (2019) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.004 · Cited by 106
Chromatin topology, condensates and gene regulation: shifting paradigms or just a phase?
Mir, M., Bickmore, W. A., Furlong, E. E. M., & Narlikar, G. J. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.182766 · Cited by 113
RNA polymerase II is required for spatial chromatin reorganization following exit from mitosis
Zhang, S., Übelmesser, N., Josipović, N., Forte, G., Slotman, J. A., Chiang, M., Gothe, H. J., Gusmao, E. G., Becker, C., Altmüller, J., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg8205 · Cited by 114
Račko, D., Benedetti, F., Dorier, J., & Stasiak, A. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1123 · Cited by 120
Mechanisms of Chromosome Folding and Nuclear Organization: Their Interplay and Open QuestionsPreprint
Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040147 · Cited by 111
Self-citationChang, L., Li, M., Shao, S., Li, C., Ai, S., Xue, B., Hou, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, R., Fan, X., et al. (2020) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-020-00794-8 · Cited by 115
Transcription-mediated supercoiling regulates genome folding and loop formation
Neguembor, M. V., Martin, L., Castells-García, Á., Gómez-García, P. A., Vicario, C., Carnevali, D., Abed, J. A., Granados, A., Sebastián-Pérez, R., Sottile, F., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.009 · Cited by 106
A TAD boundary is preserved upon deletion of the CTCF-rich Firre locus
Barutcu, A. R., Maass, P. G., Lewandowski, J. P., Weiner, C. L., & Rinn, J. L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03614-0 · Cited by 101
CTCF as a boundary factor for cohesin-mediated loop extrusion: evidence for a multi-step mechanism
Hansen, A. S. (2020) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2020.1782024 · Cited by 101
Popay, T. M., & Dixon, J. R. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102117 · Cited by 94
Kaushal, A., Mohana, G., Dorier, J., Özdemir, İ., Omer, A., Cousin, P., Semenova, A. I., Taschner, M., Dergai, O., Marzetta, F., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21366-2 · Cited by 99
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Early Animal DevelopmentPreprint
Du, Z., Zhang, K., & Xie, W. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a039677 · Cited by 105
Cuadrado, A., Giménez-Llorente, D., Kojic, A., Rodríguez-Corsino, M., Cuartero, Y., Martín‐Serrano, G., Goméz-López, G., Martı́-Renom, M. A., & Losada, A. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.078 · Cited by 105
Co-opted transposons help perpetuate conserved higher-order chromosomal structures
Choudhary, M. N. K., Friedman, R. Z., Wang, J. T., Jang, H. J., Zhuo, X., & Wang, T. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1916-8 · Cited by 110
Surdez, D., Zaïdi, S., Grossetête, S., Laud-Duval, K., Ferre, A. S., Mous, L., Vourc’h, T., Tirode, F., Pierron, G., Raynal, V., et al. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.04.001 · Cited by 106
Crispatzu, G., Rehimi, R., Pachano, T., Bleckwehl, T., Cruz-Molina, S., Xiao, C., Mahabir, E., Bazzi, H., & Rada-Iglesias, A. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24641-4 · Cited by 97
Rosin, L. F., Nguyen, S. C., & Joyce, E. F. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007393 · Cited by 98
CTCF: a Swiss-army knife for genome organization and transcription regulation
Braccioli, L., & de Wit, E. (2019) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20180069 · Cited by 106
Smchd1 regulates long-range chromatin interactions on the inactive X chromosome and at Hox clusters
Jansz, N., Keniry, A., Trussart, M., Bildsoe, H., Beck, T. J., Tonks, I. D., Mould, A. W., Hickey, P. F., Breslin, K. A., Iminitoff, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0111-z · Cited by 101
Hi-C analysis: from data generation to integration
Pal, K., Forcato, M., & Ferrari, F. (2018) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-018-0489-1 · Cited by 102
Organization of fast and slow chromatin revealed by single-nucleosome dynamics
Ashwin, S. S., Nozaki, T., Maeshima, K., & Sasai, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1907342116 · Cited by 100
Madsen, J. G. S., Madsen, M. S., Rauch, A., Traynor, S., Hauwaert, E. L. V., Haakonsson, A. K., Javierre, B. M., Hyldahl, M., Fraser, P., & Mandrup, S. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0709-z · Cited by 97
Unraveling the 3D Genome Architecture in Plants: Present and Future
Ouyang, W., Xiong, D., Li, G., & Li, X. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.10.002 · Cited by 96
Mapping the Global Chromatin Connectivity Network for Sox2 Function in Neural Stem Cell Maintenance
Bertolini, J. A., Favaro, R., Zhu, Y., Pagin, M., Ngan, C. Y., Wong, C., Tjong, H., Vermunt, M. W., Martynoga, B., Barone, C., et al. (2019) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.02.004 · Cited by 96
Multiscale modeling of genome organization with maximum entropy optimization
Lin, X., Qi, Y., Latham, A. P., & Zhang, B. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0044150 · Cited by 93
Visualizing the Role of Boundary Elements in Enhancer-Promoter Communication
Yokoshi, M., Kazuma, S., & Fukaya, T. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.007 · Cited by 89
New insights into genome folding by loop extrusion from inducible degron technologies
de Wit, E., & Nora, E. P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00530-4 · Cited by 91
SARS-CoV-2 restructures host chromatin architecture
Wang, R.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J., Xiong, F., Hasani, L. A., Shi, Y., Simpson, E. N., Zhu, X., Chen, Y.-T., Shivshankar, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01344-8 · Cited by 61
Conte, M., Irani, E., Chiariello, A. M., Abraham, A., Bianco, S., Esposito, A., & Nicodemi, M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31856-6 · Cited by 98
SMC Complexes: Universal DNA Looping Machines with Distinct Regulators
van Ruiten, M. S., & Rowland, B. D. (2018) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2018.03.003 · Cited by 86
Visualizing the genome in high resolution challenges our textbook understanding
Lakadamyali, M., & Cosma, M. P. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0758-3 · Cited by 92
TADs and Their Borders: Free Movement or Building a Wall?
Chang, L., Ghosh, S., & Noordermeer, D. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.025 · Cited by 97
Tóthová, Z., Valton, A.-L., Gorelov, R. A., Vallurupalli, M., Krill-Burger, J. M., Holmes, A. L., Landers, C. C., Haydu, J. E., Małolepsza, E., Hartigan, C. R., et al. (2020) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.142149 · Cited by 90
BRD4 orchestrates genome folding to promote neural crest differentiation
Linares-Saldana, R., Kim, W., Bolar, N. A., Zhang, H., Koch-Bojalad, B. A., Yoon, S., Shah, P. P., Karnay, A. M., Park, D. S., Luppino, J. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00934-8 · Cited by 91
The Birth of the 3D Genome during Early Embryonic Development
Hug, C. B., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2018) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2018.09.002 · Cited by 90
Computational methods for analysing multiscale 3D genome organization
Zhang, Y., Boninsegna, L., Yang, M., Misteli, T., Alber, F., & Ma, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00638-1 · Cited by 97
The Nuclear LaminaPreprint
Wong, X., Melendez-Perez, A. J., & Reddy, K. L. (2021) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a040113 · Cited by 97
Lhoumaud, P., Badri, S., Rodriguez-Hernaez, J., Sakellaropoulos, T., Sethia, G., Kloetgen, A., Cornwell, M., Bhattacharyya, S., Ay, F., Bonneau, R., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12811-4 · Cited by 92
Chromatin Hyperacetylation Impacts Chromosome Folding by Forming a Nuclear Subcompartment
Rosencrance, C. D., Ammouri, H., Yu, Q., Ge, T., Rendleman, E. J., Marshall, S. A., & Eagen, K. P. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.018 · Cited by 89
Chen, Z., Amro, E. M., Becker, F. R., Hölzer, M., Rasa, S. M. M., Njeru, S. N., Han, B., Sanzo, S. D., Chen, Y.-L., Tang, D., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20181505 · Cited by 88
3D ATAC-PALM: super-resolution imaging of the accessible genome
Xie, L., Dong, P., Chen, X., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Banala, S., Marzio, M. D., English, B. P., Qi, Y., Jung, S. K., Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0775-2 · Cited by 86
Wang, C., Colognori, D., Sunwoo, H., Wang, D., & Lee, J. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10755-3 · Cited by 84
The role of 3D chromatin domains in gene regulation: a multi-facetted view on genome organization
Ibrahim, D. M., & Mundlos, S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.02.015 · Cited by 87
Wu, Q., Guo, Y., Lu, Y., Li, J., Guo, Y., & Jia, Z. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-01984-7 · Cited by 84
Heterochromatin as an Important Driver of Genome Organization
Penagos‐Puig, A., & Furlan-Magaril, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.579137 · Cited by 92
Structural basis for Scc3-dependent cohesin recruitment to chromatin
Li, Y., Muir, K., Bowler, M. W., Metz, J., Haering, C. H., & Panne, D. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.38356 · Cited by 84
Self-citationPolymer Modeling Predicts Chromosome Reorganization in Senescence
Chiang, M., Michieletto, D., Brackley, C. A., Rattanavirotkul, N., Mohammed, H., Marenduzzo, D., & Chandra, T. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.045 · Cited by 80
Mechanistic modeling of chromatin folding to understand function
Brackley, C. A., Marenduzzo, D., & Gilbert, N. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0852-6 · Cited by 82
Cajigas, I., Chakraborty, A., Swyter, K. R., Luo, H., Bastidas, M., Nigro, M., Morris, E. R., Chen, S., VanGompel, M. J. W., Leib, D., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.024 · Cited by 82
Forces driving the three‐dimensional folding of eukaryotic genomes
Rada-Iglesias, Á., Grosveld, F. G., & Papantonis, A. (2018) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188214 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwarzer, W., Abdennur, N., Goloborodko, A., Pekowska, A., Fudenberg, G., Loe-Mie, Y., Fonseca, N. A., Huber, W., Haering, C. H., Mirny, L., & Spitz, F.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mirny, Leonid
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-09-27
- Volume
- 551
- Issue
- 7678
- Pages
- 51-56
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC5687303
- OpenAlex
- W2757387674
- Cited by
- 1,196
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 32
- FWCI
- 51.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1504942)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory
- European Commission (305626)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1331/3-1, SP 1331/3-1)
- National Institutes of Health (DK 107980)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114190)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107980)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- chromatin organization, topologically associating domains, cohesin, NIPBL, loop extrusion, enhancer-promoter interactions, 3D genome organization, chromatin state, CTCF, interphase chromosomes, hepatocytes, genome compartmentalization
- MeSH terms
- Cohesins, Animals, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Liver, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Cell Cycle Proteins, Epigenesis, Genetic, Chromosome Positioning, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
