Cited by 4,637CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRNA regulation and disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9

Open access

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9–based genetic screens are a powerful new tool in biology. By simply altering the sequence of the single-guide RNA (sgRNA), one can reprogram Cas9 to target different sites in the genome with relative ease, but the on-target activity and off-target effects of individual sgRNAs can vary widely. Here, we use recently devised sgRNA design rules to create human and mouse genome-wide libraries, perform positive and negative selection screens and observe that the use of these rules produced improved results. Additionally, we profile the off-target activity of thousands of sgRNAs and develop a metric to predict off-target sites. We incorporate these findings from large-scale, empirical data to improve our computational design rules and create optimized sgRNA libraries that maximize on-target activity and minimize off-target effects to enable more effective and efficient genetic screens and genome engineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3437

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 54 references

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Steiger, J.H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull. 87, 245–251 (1980). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,030

Metadata

Authors
Doench, J. G., Fusi, N., Sullender, M., Hegde, M., Vaimberg, E. W., Donovan, K. F., Smith, I., Tothova, Z., Wilen, C., Orchard, R., Virgin, H. W., Listgarten, J., & Root, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Microsoft Research New England (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Doench, John G
  • Listgarten, Jennifer
  • Root, David E
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2016-01-18
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
184-191
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2252568502
Cited by
4,637
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 494 · 2025: 658 · 2024: 569 · 2023: 572 · 2022: 538 · 2021: 499 · 2020: 463 · 2019: 337 · 2018: 258 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 75
FWCI
144.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (K12CA087723)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI109725, T32AI007163)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
sgRNA design, CRISPR/Cas9, off-target effects, on-target activity, genetic screen, off-target prediction, genome editing, human genome, mouse genome
MeSH terms
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Animals, Drug Resistance, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Gene Library, Genome, Genomics, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review