Cited by 521Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchEnzyme Structure and FunctionEnzyme function and inhibition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 15 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Histone deacetylase 6 structure and molecular basis of catalysis and inhibition

Open access
Hai, Yang, Christianson, David W·2016·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) is a critical target for drug design because of its role in oncogenic transformation and cancer metastasis, and is unique among all histone deacetylases in that it contains tandem catalytic domains designated CD1 and CD2. We now report the crystal structures of CD2 from Homo sapiens HDAC6 and of CD1 and CD2 from Danio rerio HDAC6. We correlated these structures with activity measurements using 13 different substrates. The catalytic activity of CD2 from both species exhibited broad substrate specificity, whereas that of CD1 was highly specific for substrates bearing C-terminal acetyllysine residues. Crystal structures of substrate complexes yielded unprecedented snapshots of the catalytic mechanism. Additionally, crystal structures of complexes with eight different inhibitors, including belinostat and panobinostat (currently used in cancer chemotherapy), the macrocyclic tetrapeptide HC toxin, and the HDAC6-specific inhibitor N-hydroxy-4-(2-((2-hydroxyethyl)(phenyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)benzamide, revealed surprising new insight regarding changes in Zn(2+) coordination and isozyme-specific inhibition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.2134

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

7 of 15 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 58 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 53
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
60 of 60
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no crystal structures of HDAC6 catalytic domains existed.

    “Despite these unresolved structure-function relationships, no crystal structures of HDAC6 catalytic domains have been available until now.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The active site of a Zn2+ hydrolase is adapted to allow water to attack almost any carbonyl group and to stabilize the resulting tetrahedral species.

    “The active site of a Zn2+ hydrolase has evolved to enable nucleophilic attack of water at virtually any carbonyl group, preferentially stabilizing the resulting tetrahedral species.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The inhibitor binding modes observed in zebrafish CD2 crystals are representative of human HDAC6.

    “Finally, comparison of different zCD2-inhibitor structures highlights the structural basis for HDAC6-specific inhibitor design, which exploits a previously unobserved Zn2+ coordination mode by the hydroxamate group of HPOB: inhibitor binding does not require displacement of Zn2+-bound water.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Aoe side chain carbonyl is isosteric with the scissile carbonyl of acetyllysine.

    “Since the carbonyl group of the Aoe side chain is isosteric with the scissile carbonyl of acetyllysine, the binding of Aoe-containing peptides to any HDAC should enable facile hydration of the Aoe ketone carbonyl, as observed in the zCD2-HC toxin complex.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The active site geometry of class I HDACs is sufficiently similar to zCD2 that the nucleophile and inhibitor binding conclusions transfer.

    “Presumably, inhibitor binding to class I HDAC active sites allows for a closer contact between the nucleophilic thiol and the electrophilic epoxide to enable covalent bond formation.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Substrate 1 complex is assigned to two different mutants

    Minor

    The crystallization method identifies the zCD2-substrate 1 complex as Y745F, but the structure-determination section repeatedly identifies it as Y785F. These are different residue numbers for the same reported complex.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 491

Metadata

Authors
Hai, Y., & Christianson, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Christianson, David W
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2016-07-25
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
741-747
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W2499955277
Cited by
521
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 9
FWCI
23.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM049758)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme function and inhibition
Keywords
HDAC6, crystal structure, substrate specificity, catalytic mechanism, belinostat, panobinostat, HC-toxin, zinc coordination, small molecule inhibitors, cancer drug targets
MeSH terms
Animals, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, Models, Molecular, Structure-Activity Relationship, Substrate Specificity, Zebrafish, Molecular Structure, Biocatalysis, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review