Cited by 199Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyProtist diversity and phylogeny

Decimetre-scale multicellular eukaryotes from the 1.56-billion-year-old Gaoyuzhuang Formation in North China

Open access
Zhu, Shixing, Zhu, Maoyan, Knoll, Andrew H., Yin, Zongjun, Zhao, Fangchen, Sun, Shufen, Qu, Yuangao, Shi, Min +1 more·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Fossils of macroscopic eukaryotes are rarely older than the Ediacaran Period (635–541 million years (Myr)), and their interpretation remains controversial. Here, we report the discovery of macroscopic fossils from the 1,560-Myr-old Gaoyuzhuang Formation, Yanshan area, North China, that exhibit both large size and regular morphology. Preserved as carbonaceous compressions, the Gaoyuzhuang fossils have statistically regular linear to lanceolate shapes up to 30 cm long and nearly 8 cm wide, suggesting that the Gaoyuzhuang fossils record benthic multicellular eukaryotes of unprecedentedly large size. Syngenetic fragments showing closely packed ∼10 μm cells arranged in a thick sheet further reinforce the interpretation. Comparisons with living thalloid organisms suggest that these organisms were photosynthetic, although their phylogenetic placement within the Eukarya remains uncertain. The new fossils provide the strongest evidence yet that multicellular eukaryotes with decimetric dimensions and a regular developmental program populated the marine biosphere at least a billion years before the Cambrian Explosion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms11500

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eukaryotic multicellularity at ~1.6 Ga followed soon after the 1.7 to 1.6 Ga stem eukaryote remains.

    “Eukaryotic multicellularity at ∼1.6 Ga followed soon after those 1.7 to 1.6 Ga stem eukaryote remains (Zhu et al., 2016)”

    From Oxygenation, Life, and the Planetary System during Earth's Middle History: An Overview (2021) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2016

    The Discussion (page unavailable) concludes that eukaryotes had evolved multicellularity by about 1.6 Ga. The paper also mentions older North China fossils, but says their cellular structure and affinities are uncertain; it does not establish them as 1.7–1.6 Ga stem-eukaryote remains or explicitly link the Gaoyuzhuang fossils to them. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Javaux E. J. in Origins and Evolution of Life: An Astrobiology Perspective eds Gargaud M., Lopez-Garcia P., Martin H. 414– 449Cambridge University Press (2011).
  2. Wang C. Biomarker evidence for eukaryote algae flourishing in a Mesoproterozoic (1.6∼1.5 Gyr) stratified sea on the North China Craton. Geoch. Cosmo. Acta 73, A1407 (2009).
  3. Brasier M. & Lindsay J. F. A billion years of environmental stability and the emergence of eukaryotes: New data from northern Australia. Geology 26, 555– 558 (1998). 11541449

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, S., Zhu, M., Knoll, A. H., Yin, Z., Zhao, F., Sun, S., Qu, Y., Shi, M., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • China Geological Survey (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • China University of Geosciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Maoyan
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11500-11500
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2396542812
Cited by
199
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272015)
  • NASA Astrobiology Institute
  • China Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
Keywords
multicellular eukaryotes, Ediacaran fossils, Gaoyuzhuang Formation, photosynthetic organisms, Cambrian explosion, early eukaryotic evolution
MeSH terms
China, Fossils, Spectrum Analysis, Raman, Time Factors, Geologic Sediments, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review