Cited by 76Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceDNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Homologous recombination-dependent repair of telomeric DSBs in proliferating human cells

Open access
Mao, Pingsu, Liu, Jingfan, Zhang, Zepeng, Zhang, Hong, Liu, Haiying, Gao, Song, Rong, Yikang S., Zhao, Yong·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Telomeres prevent chromosome ends from being recognized as double-stranded breaks (DSBs). Meanwhile, G/C-rich repetitive telomeric DNA is susceptible to attack by DNA-damaging agents. How cells balance the need to protect DNA ends and the need to repair DNA lesions in telomeres is unknown. Here we show that telomeric DSBs are efficiently repaired in proliferating cells, but are irreparable in stress-induced and replicatively senescent cells. Using the CRISPR-Cas9 technique, we specifically induce DSBs at telomeric or subtelomeric regions. We find that DSB repair (DSBR) at subtelomeres occurs in an error-prone manner resulting in small deletions, suggestive of NHEJ. However, DSBR in telomeres involves ‘telomere-clustering’, 3′-protruding C-rich telomeric ssDNA, and HR between sister-chromatid or interchromosomal telomeres. DSBR in telomeres is suppressed by deletion or inhibition of Rad51. These findings reveal proliferation-dependent DSBR in telomeres and suggest that telomeric HR, which is normally constitutively suppressed, is activated in the context of DSBR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms12154

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Homologous recombination repair is restricted to proliferating cells undergoing S-phase and is therefore unlikely to be relevant for post-mitotic cardiomyocytes.

    “In contrast, homologous recombination can repair telomere‐induced DNA damage; however, this process is restricted to proliferating cells undergoing S‐phase and therefore not likely to be relevant for post‐mitotic CMs (Mao et al, 2016).”

    From Length-independent telomere damage drives post-mitotic cardiomyocyte senescence (2019) · cites this paper as Mao et al, 2016

    The Abstract reports homologous recombination-dependent repair of telomeric breaks in proliferating human cells, but not in senescent cells. The Discussion (page unavailable) treats the timing of that repair within the cell cycle as an open question, rather than establishing that it is restricted to S-phase. The paper does not study post-mitotic cardiomyocytes, so the proposed implication for them is not directly supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Homologous recombination can repair telomere-induced DNA damage.

    “In contrast, homologous recombination can repair telomere‐induced DNA damage; however, this process is restricted to proliferating cells undergoing S‐phase and therefore not likely to be relevant for post‐mitotic CMs (Mao et al, 2016).”

    From Length-independent telomere damage drives post-mitotic cardiomyocyte senescence (2019) · cites this paper as Mao et al, 2016

    The Abstract reports that telomeric double-strand breaks are repaired in proliferating human cells and that multiple features point to homologous recombination. But the Discussion explicitly leaves open whether this repair occurs only in late S and G2, so the cited paper does not establish the sentence’s S-phase restriction or test its relevance to post-mitotic cardiomyocytes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Proliferation rate is an important determinant of telomeric DSB repair.

    “suggesting that proliferation rate is an important determinant of telomeric DSB repair (Mao et al., 2016).”

    From Telomeres and cell senescence—size matters not (2017) · cites this paper as Mao et al., 2016

  • Repair at telomeres is only observed in proliferating cells, such as BJ fibroblasts and HeLa cells.

    “repair at telomeres was only observed in proliferating cells, such as BJ fibroblasts and HeLa cells.”

    From Telomeres and cell senescence—size matters not (2017) · cites this paper as Mao et al., 2016

  • DSB repair can occur at telomeres.

    “studies which have provided evidence that DSB repair can occur at telomeres (Doksani and de Lange, 2016, Mao et al., 2016).”

    From Telomeres and cell senescence—size matters not (2017) · cites this paper as Mao et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mao, P., Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, H., Gao, S., Rong, Y. S., & Zhao, Y.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Yong
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
12154-12154
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2464486432
Cited by
76
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2014CB964703, 31271472, 31322033, 31301110)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2014CB964703)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
telomeres, DNA double-strand break repair, homologous recombination, telomeric DNA damage, subtelomeric regions, non-homologous end joining, RAD51, replicative senescence, stress-induced senescence, sister chromatid recombination, single-stranded DNA, error-prone repair, proliferating cells
MeSH terms
Fibroblasts, HeLa Cells, Humans, Telomere, Cellular Senescence, Cell Proliferation, HEK293 Cells, DNA End-Joining Repair, Recombinational DNA Repair, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review