Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize

Riedelsheimer, Christian, Czedik-Eysenberg, Angelika, Grieder, Christoph, Lisec, Jan, Technow, Frank, Sulpice, Ronan, Altmann, Thomas, Stitt, Mark, Willmitzer, Lothar, Melchinger, Albrecht E·2012·Nature Genetics
DOI 10.1038/ng.1033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.1033

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Schnable, P.S. et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326, 1112–1115 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Montes, J.M., Melchinger, A.E. & Reif, J.C. Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 433–436 (2007). · DOI
  3. Steinfath, M. et al. Discovering plant metabolic biomarkers for phenotype prediction using an untargeted approach. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8, 900–911 (2010). · DOI
  4. Meyer, R.C. et al. The metabolic signature related to high plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4759–4764 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Schauer, N. et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 447–454 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kump, K.L. et al. Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 43, 163–168 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Tian, F. et al. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 43, 159–162 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Poland, J.A. et al. Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6893–6898 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bernardo, R. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 48, 1649–1664 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Xu, Y. & Crouch, J. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci. 48, 391–407 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Heffner, E.L., Sorrells, M.E. & Jannink, J.-L. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49, 1–12 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lippman, Z.B. & Zamir, D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet. 23, 60–66 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hallauer, A.R., Carena, M.J. & Filho, J.B.M. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding (Iowa State University Press, 2010). · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_12
  14. Meuwissen, T.H.E., Hayes, B.J. & Goddard, M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hayes, B.J. et al. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 433–443 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jannink, J.-L., Lorenz, A.J. & Iwata, H. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct. Genomics 9, 166–177 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Lorenzana, R.E. & Bernardo, R. Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 151–161 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion oft the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  19. de los Campos, G., Gianola, D. & Allison, D.B. Predicting genetic predispositions in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 880–886 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Smith, J.S.C. et al. Use of doubled haploids in maize breeding: implications for intellectual property protection and genetic diversity in hybrid crops. Mol. Breed. 22, 51–59 (2008). · DOI
  21. Ching, A. et al. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. BMC Genet. 3, 19 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Van Inghelandt, D. et al. Extent and genome-wide distribution of linkage disequilibrium in commercial maize germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 11–20 (2011). · DOI
  23. Yan, J. et al. Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLoS ONE 4, e8451 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Elshire, R.J. et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6, e19379 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Meuwissen, T. & Goddard, M. Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185, 623–631 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Stitt, M., Sulpice, R. & Keurentjes, J. Metabolic networks: how to identify key components in the regulation of metabolism and growth. Plant Physiol. 152, 428–444 (2010). · DOI
  27. Sulpice, R. et al. Starch as a major integrator in the regulation of plant growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10348–10353 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lisec, J., Schauer, N., Kopka, J., Willmitzer, L. & Fernie, A.R. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat. Protoc. 1, 387–396 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203–208 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Piepho, H.-P. Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci. 49, 1165–1176 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Albrecht, T. et al. Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 339–350 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Habier, D., Fernando, R.L., Kizilkaya, K. & Garrick, D.J. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 186 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Clark, S.A., Hickey, J.M. & van der Werf, J.H.J. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43, 18 (2011). · DOI
  34. Goddard, M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245–257 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Duvick, D.N., Smith, J.S.C. & Cooper, M. Long term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breed. Rev. 24, 109–151 (2004).
  36. Eyre-Walker, A., Gaut, R.L., Hilton, H., Feldman, D.L. & Gaut, B.S. Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4441–4446 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hoisington, D. et al. Plant genetic resources: what can they contribute toward increased crop productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5937–5943 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nelson, P.T. et al. Molecular characterization of maize inbreds with expired U.S. plant variety protection. Crop Sci. 48, 1673–1685 (2008). · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0092
  39. Melchinger, A.E., Gumber, R.K., Leipert, R.B., Vuylsteke, M. & Kuiper, M. Prediction of testcross means and variances among F3 progenies of F1 crosses from testcross means and genetic distances of their parents in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 503–512 (1999). · doi:10.1007/s001220050767
  40. Saito, K. & Matsuda, F. Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 463–489 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Fischer, S. et al. Trends in genetic variance components during 30 years of hybrid maize breeding at the University of Hohenheim. Plant Breed. 127, 446–451 (2009). · DOI
  42. Desper, R. & Gascuel, O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J. Comput. Biol. 9, 687–705 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Cross, J.M. et al. Variation of enzyme activities and metabolite levels in 24 Arabidopsis accessions growing in carbon-limited conditions. Plant Physiol. 142, 1574–1588 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Cuadros-Inostroza, Á. et al. TargetSearch—a bioconductor package for the efficient preprocessing of GC-MS metabolite profiling data. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 428 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Chen, W.-M. & Abecasis, G.R. Family-based association tests for genome-wide association scans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 913–926 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Hayes, B.J., Visscher, P.M. & Goddard, M.E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. (Camb). 91, 47–60 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Yang, J., Lee, H., Goddard, M.E. & Visscher, P.M. GCTA: a tool for fenome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Legarra, A., Robert-Granié, C., Manfredi, E. & Elsen, J.-M. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180, 611–618 (2008). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
Riedelsheimer, C., Czedik-Eysenberg, A., Grieder, C., Lisec, J., Technow, F., Sulpice, R., Altmann, T., Stitt, M., Willmitzer, L., & Melchinger, A. E.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-01-15
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
217-220
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
DOI
10.1038/ng.1033
OpenAlex
W2033670977
Cited by
612
References
5
FWCI
26.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.1033
The paper
Riedelsheimer, C., Czedik-Eysenberg, A., Grieder, C., Lisec, J., Technow, F., Sulpice, R., Altmann, T., Stitt, M., Willmitzer, L., & Melchinger, A. E. (2012). Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.