Cited by 299Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Extremely low-coverage sequencing and imputation increases power for genome-wide association studies

Open access
Pasaniuc, Bogdan, Rohland, Nadin, McLaren, Paul J, Garimella, Kiran, Zaitlen, Noah, Li, Heng, Gupta, Namrata, Neale, Benjamin M +16 more·2012·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have proven to be a powerful method to identify common genetic variants contributing to susceptibility to common diseases. Here, we show that extremely low-coverage sequencing (0.1-0.5×) captures almost as much of the common (>5%) and low-frequency (1-5%) variation across the genome as SNP arrays. As an empirical demonstration, we show that genome-wide SNP genotypes can be inferred at a mean r(2) of 0.71 using off-target data (0.24× average coverage) in a whole-exome study of 909 samples. Using both simulated and real exome-sequencing data sets, we show that association statistics obtained using extremely low-coverage sequencing data attain similar P values at known associated variants as data from genotyping arrays, without an excess of false positives. Within the context of reductions in sample preparation and sequencing costs, funds invested in extremely low-coverage sequencing can yield several times the effective sample size of GWAS based on SNP array data and a commensurate increase in statistical power.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2283

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of supporting resources for diverse ancestries creates financial challenges for association studies with limited resources.

    “The lack of supporting resources for diverse ancestries creates financial challenges for association studies with limited resources, e.g. raising questions about whether to genotype samples on GWAS arrays that may favor European allele frequencies versus sequence samples, and how dense of an array to choose or how deeply to sequence71,72.”

    From Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Discussion (page not provided) compares the costs and effective sample sizes of sequencing at different depths versus SNP-array genotyping under a fixed budget, supporting the financial study-design trade-off. It also says large reference-haplotype panels are important, but does not say that a lack of resources for diverse ancestries creates these financial challenges or that arrays favor European allele frequencies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Imputation of a 1× sample of NE1 at a genotype probability threshold of 0.99 retained 78% of loci, and 99.20% of imputed genotypes matched high-coverage calls.

    “Considering an imputed 1 × sample of NE1 and imposing a genotype probability threshold of 0.99, 78% of these loci remained, with diminishing return from increasing coverage in the subsample (Supplementary Fig. 5). Of the imputed genotypes, 99.20% (99.18% of heterozygotes) matched the observed high-coverage calls, validating this approach for expanding our data (Supplementary Figs 5–9).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasaniuc, B., Rohland, N., McLaren, P. J., Garimella, K., Zaitlen, N., Li, H., Gupta, N., Neale, B. M., Daly, M. J., Sklar, P., Sullivan, P. F., Bergen, S., Moran, J. L., Hultman, C. M., Lichtenstein, P., Magnusson, P., Purcell, S. M., Haas, D. W., Liang, L., Sunyaev, S., Patterson, N., de Bakker, P. I. W., Reich, D., & Price, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Reich, David
  • Price, Alkes L
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2012-05-20
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
631-635
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W1979543168
Cited by
299
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 15
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Harvard University
  • Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI060354, AI060354)
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ai069511-02, 5u01ai069495-05, 5u01ai069419-04, 5u01ai069465-04, 5u01ai069467-02, 2um1ai069501-15, 5u01ai069502-05, AI069501, AI 068636, AI069556, AI28568, AI069465, AI069450, AI069423, AI060354, AI68634, AI069424, AI077505, AI069484, AI069511, AI069513, AI069434, AI069452, AI069432, AI069474, AI069428, AI069471, AI069419, AI069495, AI069472, AI069502, RR024975, AI069532, AI069415, AI069477)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (AL-32782)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington
  • Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH089025, R01MH089004, RC2MH089905, R01MH089208, R01MH095034, R01MH089482, R01MH084676)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG006399, HG006399)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U01-AI069465, AI – 68634, UM1AI069474, AI069502, UM1AI069513, UM1AI069495, U01AI069474, UM1AI069532, AI 069474, AI-069511, AI 069423, AI-069415, UM1AI069556, AI-25859, U01AI069434, U01-AI-069511, AI 069432, AI-069501, U01-AI069419, AI-069428, U01 AI-069502, AI-069434, AI 46370, U01-AI-069495, AI-069495, AI 38844, AI 069556, AI-069450, AI069472, U01AI069477, AI-069532, U01AI069423, U01AI069428, U01AI027661, AI-069477, AI-27661, U01AI034835, U01AI038844, AI 069471, UM1AI069477, U01AI068636, U01AI069452, AI 069452, U01AI069424, AI069465, UM1AI069434, AI-068636, UM1-AI069501, AI-69467, U01AI025859, AI 069513, AI 069484, U01AI069471, U01AI069450, R37AI028568, U01AI069556, U01AI046370, UM1AI069415, UM1AI069502, U01AI069532, AI077505, U01-AI069467, R01AI030914, U01AI068634, U01AI069432, U01AI069501, U01AI032782, AI-34853, UM1AI069467, UM1AI069428, U01AI069472, U01AI069513, UM1AI069450, U01AI069415, UM1AI069472, AI 069424, U01AI034853, AI069419, U01AI069484, AI34835, AI 30914, R01AI028568, UM1AI069484, UM1AI069432, UM1AI069419, UM1AI068636, UM1AI069471, UM1AI068634, UM1AI069465, UM1AI069423, R01AI077505, P30AI060354, UM1AI069424, UM1AI069511, UM1AI069452, AI 28568)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK043351)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES007142)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (U01DE017018)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR024975, KL2RR024977, TL1RR024978, UL1RR024975)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
imputation, genome-wide association study, statistical power, exome sequencing, 1000 Genomes Project, SNP array, common genetic variants, false positives, sequencing cost reduction, effective sample size
MeSH terms
Humans, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review