The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique
(1960) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb73127.x · Cited by 4,912
Handbook of ethological methods
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4483 · Cited by 1,720
Genetics of Mouse Behavior: Interactions with Laboratory Environment
Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D., & Dudek, B. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5420.1670 · Cited by 1,666
Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.
Campbell, D. T. (1957) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040950 · Cited by 1,140
Mouse genetics: concepts and applications
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2135 · Cited by 758
Rampon, C., Tang, Y.-P., Goodhouse, J., Shimizu, E., Kyin, M., & Tsien, J. Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72945 · Cited by 755
Baggerly, K. A., Morris, J. S., & Coombes, K. R. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg484 · Cited by 621
Phenotypic plasticity : functional and conceptual approaches
DeWitt, T. J., & Scheiner, S. M. (2004) · Cited by 578
Research in the Psychological Laboratory: Truth or Triviality?
Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00002 · Cited by 505
Cited by
Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”
Mellor, D. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6030021 · Cited by 948
Inconsistencies and Controversies Surrounding the Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease
Morris, G. P., Clark, I. A., & Vissel, B. (2014) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-014-0135-5 · Cited by 522
Environmental enrichment, new neurons and the neurobiology of individuality
Kempermann, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0120-x · Cited by 477
Reproducibility of preclinical animal research improves with heterogeneity of study samples
Voelkl, B., Vogt, L., Sena, E. S., & Würbel, H. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003693 · Cited by 262
Self-citationReproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies
Kafkafi, N., Agassi, J., Chesler, E. J., Crabbe, J. C., Crusio, W. E., Eilam, D., Gerlai, R., Golani, I., Gomez-Marin, A., Heller, R., et al. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003 · Cited by 215
Self-citationZhong, G., Droho, S., Crone, S. A., Dietz, S., Kwan, A. C., Webb, W. W., Sharma, K., & Harris-Warrick, R. M. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4849-09.2010 · Cited by 159
More than 3Rs: The importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research
Würbel, H. (2017) · Lab Animal · doi:10.1038/laban.1220 · Cited by 152
Self-citationCan animal data predict human outcome? Problems and pitfalls of translational animal research
Martić-Kehl, M. I., Schibli, R., & Schubiger, P. A. (2012) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2175-z · Cited by 110
Whyte, L. S., Hemsley, K. M., Lau, A. A., Hassiotis, S., Saito, T., Saido, T. C., Hopwood, J. J., & Sargeant, T. J. (2018) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.09.006 · Cited by 88
Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators.
LaFollette, M. R., O’Haire, M. E., Cloutier, S., Blankenberger, W. B., & Gaskill, B. N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175320 · Cited by 84
The researchers’ view of scientific rigor—survey on the conduct and reporting of in vivo research
Reichlin, T. S., Vogt, L., & Würbel, H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165999 · Cited by 72
Self-citationEthological concepts enhance the translational value of animal models
Peters, S. M., Pothuizen, H. H. J., & Spruijt, B. M. (2015) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.043 · Cited by 70
Refining animal research: The Animal Study Registry
Bert, B., Heinl, C., Chmielewska, J., Schwarz, F., Grune, B., Hensel, A., Greiner, M., & Schönfelder, G. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000463 · Cited by 67
Blanchard, D. C., Summers, C. H., & Blanchard, R. J. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.008 · Cited by 60
Gaskill, B. N., & Garner, J. P. (2017) · Lab Animal · doi:10.1038/laban.1218 · Cited by 41
Self-citationJaric, I., Voelkl, B., Clerc, M., Schmid, M. W., Novak, J., Rosso, M., Rufener, R., von Kortzfleisch, V. T., Richter, S. H., Buettner, M., et al. (2022) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001837 · Cited by 32
Self-citationCurious creatures: A multi-taxa investigation of responses to novelty in a zoo environment
Hall, B. A., Melfi, V., Burns, A., McGill, D. M., & Doyle, R. E. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4454 · Cited by 32
How our approaches to assessing benefits and harms can be improved
Sena, E., & Currie, G. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.28.1.107 · Cited by 23
Gabbert, S., Mathea, M., Kolle, S. N., & Landsiedel, R. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13648 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, S. H., Garner, J. P., & Würbel, H.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2009-03-30
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-261
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W1985359371
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 36.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
