Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IntOGen-mutations identifies cancer drivers across tumor types

Open access
Gonzalez-Perez, Abel, Perez-Llamas, Christian, Deu-Pons, Jordi, Tamborero, David, Schroeder, Michael P, Jene-Sanz, Alba, Santos, Alberto, Lopez-Bigas, Nuria·2013·Nature Methods

Abstract

IntOGen-mutations is a discovery tool for cancer researchers to find driver mutations in genes and pathways. The IntOGen-mutations platform ( http://www.intogen.org/mutations/ ) summarizes somatic mutations, genes and pathways involved in tumorigenesis. It identifies and visualizes cancer drivers, analyzing 4,623 exomes from 13 cancer sites. It provides support to cancer researchers, aids the identification of drivers across tumor cohorts and helps rank mutations for better clinical decision-making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2642

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Zhang, J. et al. Database (Oxford) 2011, bar026 (2011).
  2. Forbes, S.A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D652–D657 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gundem, G. et al. Nat. Methods 7, 92–93 (2010). · DOI
  4. Gonzalez-Perez, A. & Lopez-Bigas, N. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e169 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Tamborero, D., Gonzalez-Perez, A. & Lopez-Bigas, N. Bioinformatics 29, 2238–2244 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen, Y. et al. BMC Genomics 11, 293 (2010). · DOI
  7. Kumar, P., Henikoff, S. & Ng, P.C. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1073–1081 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Reva, B., Antipin, Y. & Sander, C. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e118 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gonzalez-Perez, A., Deu-Pons, J. & Lopez-Bigas, N. Genome med. 4, 89 (2012). · DOI
  10. Perez-Llamas, C. & Lopez-Bigas, N. PLoS ONE 6, e19541 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Robinson, G. et al. Nature 488, 43–48 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wang, L. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2497–2506 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Quesada, V. et al. Nat. Genet. 44, 47–52 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ellis, M.J. et al. Nature 486, 353–360 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Roychowdhury, S. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 111ra121 (2011). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez-Perez, A., Perez-Llamas, C., Deu-Pons, J., Tamborero, D., Schroeder, M. P., Jene-Sanz, A., Santos, A., & Lopez-Bigas, N.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2013-09-15
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1081-1082
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2094122486
Cited by
586
References
5
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.