Cited by 319Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Mapping differential interactomes by affinity purification coupled with data-independent mass spectrometry acquisition

Open access
Lambert, Jean-Philippe, Ivosev, Gordana, Couzens, Amber L, Larsen, Brett, Taipale, Mikko, Lin, Zhen-Yuan, Zhong, Quan, Lindquist, Susan +6 more·2013·Nature Methods

Abstract

Characterizing changes in protein-protein interactions associated with sequence variants (e.g., disease-associated mutations or splice forms) or following exposure to drugs, growth factors or hormones is critical to understanding how protein complexes are built, localized and regulated. Affinity purification (AP) coupled with mass spectrometry permits the analysis of protein interactions under near-physiological conditions, yet monitoring interaction changes requires the development of a robust and sensitive quantitative approach, especially for large-scale studies in which cost and time are major considerations. We have coupled AP to data-independent mass spectrometric acquisition (sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra, SWATH) and implemented an automated data extraction and statistical analysis pipeline to score modulated interactions. We used AP-SWATH to characterize changes in protein-protein interactions imparted by the HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 or melanoma-associated mutations in the human kinase CDK4. We show that AP-SWATH is a robust label-free approach to characterize such changes and propose a scalable pipeline for systems biology studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2702

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SWATH-MS and related DIA approaches have achieved high intra-laboratory reproducibility in a variety of research questions.

    “SWATH-MS and related DIA approaches have achieved a high degree of reproducibility in intra-laboratory studies in a variety of research questions such as interaction proteomics40, 41, plasma proteomics42, tissue proteomics43, microbial proteomics44, 45, pre-clinical toxicology9, analysis of genetic reference strains46, and many others.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lambert, J.-P., Ivosev, G., Couzens, A. L., Larsen, B., Taipale, M., Lin, Z.-Y., Zhong, Q., Lindquist, S., Vidal, M., Aebersold, R., Pawson, T., Bonner, R., Tate, S., & Gingras, A.-C.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • Sciex (Canada) (CA)
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Tate, Stephen
  • Gingras, Anne-Claude
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2013-10-27
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
1239-1245
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1964328150
Cited by
318
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG001715, P50HG004233)
  • National Cancer Institute (R33CA132073)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM094231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, interactome mapping, affinity purification, data-independent acquisition, SWATH mass spectrometry, label-free quantification, Hsp90 inhibitors, NVP-AUY922, melanoma, disease-associated mutations, pharmacological inhibition, automated data analysis pipeline, systems biology
MeSH terms
Automation, Chromatography, Affinity, Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Isoxazoles, Mutation, Proteins, Resorcinols, Mass Spectrometry, Gene Library, Principal Component Analysis, Protein Interaction Mapping, Systems Biology, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review