Cited by 430Genomics and Rare DiseasesProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Kinase mutations in human disease: interpreting genotype–phenotype relationships

Lahiry, Piya, Torkamani, Ali, Schork, Nicholas J., Hegele, Robert A.·2010·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Protein kinases are one of the largest families of evolutionarily related proteins and comprise one of the most abundant gene families in humans. Here we survey kinase gene mutations from the perspective of human disease phenotypes and further analyse the structural features of mutant kinases, including mutational hotspots. Our evaluation of the genotype-phenotype relationship across 915 human kinase mutations - that underlie 67 single-gene diseases, mainly inherited developmental and metabolic disorders and also certain cancers - enhances our understanding of the role of kinases in development, kinase dysfunction in pathogenesis and kinases as potential targets for therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg2707

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discovery of rare independent somatic mutations within and across genes contributing to tumorigenesis may parallel the functional effects of inherited variants contributing to congenital disease.

    “Second, the discovery of rare independent somatic mutations within and across genes contributing to tumorigenesis may parallel the functional effects of inherited variants contributing to congenital disease.11, 16, 17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lahiry, P., Torkamani, A., Schork, N. J., & Hegele, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hegele, Robert A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2010-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
60-74
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2095492902
Cited by
420
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025774, U54RR02504-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
protein kinases, kinase mutations, genotype-phenotype correlation, mutational hotspots, structure-function relationship, inborn errors of metabolism, developmental disorders, cancer, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Mutational Analysis, Multigene Family, Genotype, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Neoplasms, Phenotype, Phosphotransferases, Germ-Line Mutation, Genetic Diseases, Inborn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review