The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TRIC: an automated alignment strategy for reproducible protein quantification in targeted proteomics
Open accessAbstract
Next-generation mass spectrometric (MS) techniques such as SWATH-MS have substantially increased the throughput and reproducibility of proteomic analysis, but ensuring consistent quantification of thousands of peptide analytes across multiple liquid chromatography–tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) runs remains a challenging and laborious manual process. To produce highly consistent and quantitatively accurate proteomics data matrices in an automated fashion, we developed TRIC (http://proteomics.ethz.ch/tric/), a software tool that utilizes fragment-ion data to perform cross-run alignment, consistent peak-picking and quantification for high-throughput targeted proteomics. TRIC reduced the identification error compared to a state-of-the-art SWATH-MS analysis without alignment by more than threefold at constant recall while correcting for highly nonlinear chromatographic effects. On a pulsed-SILAC experiment performed on human induced pluripotent stem cells, TRIC was able to automatically align and quantify thousands of light and heavy isotopic peak groups. Thus, TRIC fills a gap in the pipeline for automated analysis of massively parallel targeted proteomics data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1511 · Cited by 14,855
Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer
Initiative, A. P. C. G., Alexandrov, L. B., ICGC Breast Cancer Consortium, ICGC MMML-Seq Consortium, PedBrain, I., Nik-Zainal, S., Wedge, D. C., Aparicio, S. A. J. R., Behjati, S., Biankin, A. V., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12477 · Cited by 9,660
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1×
“Protein turnover analysis using TRIC Protein degradation rates vary substantially across the proteome, and together with transcription rates are the main determinant of the amount of protein in a cell [33, 34].”
Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments
MacLean, B., Tomazela, D. M., Shulman, N., Chambers, M., Finney, G. L., Frewen, B., Kern, R., Tabb, D. L., Liebler, D. C., & MacCoss, M. J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054 · Cited by 4,697
Elias, J. E., & Gygi, S. P. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1019 · Cited by 3,925
GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists
Eden, E., Navon, R., Steinfeld, I., Lipson, D., & Yakhini, Z. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-48 · Cited by 3,356
Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Röst, H., Selevsek, N., Reiter, L., Bonner, R., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.016717 · Cited by 2,877
Self-citationComplement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration
Haines, J. L., Hauser, M. A., Schmidt, S., Scott, W. K., Olson, L. M., Gallins, P., Spencer, K. L., Kwan, S. Y., Noureddine, M., Gilbert, J. R., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110359 · Cited by 2,424
International network of cancer genome projects
The International Cancer Genome Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08987 · Cited by 2,299
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature 478, 103–109 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Röst, H.L., Malmström, L. & Aebersold, R. Reproducible quantitative proteotype data matrices for systems biology. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 3926–3931 (2015). · DOI
- Omenn, G.S. et al. Metrics for the Human Proteome Project 2015: progress on the human proteome and guidelines for high-confidence protein identification. J. Proteome Res. 14, 3452–3460 (2015). · DOI
- Li, X.J. et al. A blood-based proteomic classifier for the molecular characterization of pulmonary nodules. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 207ra142 (2013).
- Drabovich, A.P. et al. Differential diagnosis of azoospermia with proteomic biomarkers ECM1 and TEX101 quantified in seminal plasma. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 212ra160 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Surinova, S. et al. Prediction of colorectal cancer diagnosis based on circulating plasma proteins. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 1166–1178 (2015). · DOI
- Surinova, S. et al. Non-invasive prognostic protein biomarker signatures associated with colorectal cancer. EMBO Mol. Med. 7, 1153–1165 (2015). · DOI
- Röst, H.L. et al. OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 219–223 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Martin, D.B. et al. MRMer, an interactive open source and cross-platform system for data extraction and visualization of multiple reaction monitoring experiments. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 2270–2278 (2008). · DOI
- Mead, J.A. et al. MRMaid, the web-based tool for designing multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 696–705 (2009). · DOI
- Walsh, G.M. et al. Implementation of a data repository-driven approach for targeted proteomics experiments by multiple reaction monitoring. J. Proteomics 72, 838–852 (2009). · DOI
- Sherwood, C.A. et al. MaRiMba: a software application for spectral library-based MRM transition list assembly. J. Proteome Res. 8, 4396–4405 (2009). · DOI
- Bertsch, A. et al. Optimal de novo design of MRM experiments for rapid assay development in targeted proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 2696–2704 (2010). · DOI
- Teleman, J. et al. Automated selected reaction monitoring software for accurate label-free protein quantification. J. Proteome Res. 11, 3766–3773 (2012). · DOI
- Prakash, A. et al. Signal maps for mass spectrometry-based comparative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 423–432 (2006). · DOI
- Mueller, L.N. et al. SuperHirn—a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling. Proteomics 7, 3470–3480 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Reinstein, E. & Ciechanover, A. Narrative review: protein degradation and human diseases: the ubiquitin connection. Ann. Intern. Med. 145, 676–684 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Pratt, J.M. et al. Dynamics of protein turnover, a missing dimension in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 579–591 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Teleman, J. et al. DIANA—algorithmic improvements for analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Bioinformatics 31, 555–562 (2015). · DOI
- Prince, J.T. & Marcotte, E.M. Chromatographic alignment of ESI-LC-MS proteomics data sets by ordered bijective interpolated warping. Anal. Chem. 78, 6140–6152 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Kohlbacher, O. et al. TOPP–the OpenMS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics 23, e191–e197 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Sturm, M. et al. OpenMS—an open-source software framework for mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 163 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- Tsou, C.-C. et al. DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat. Methods 12, 258–264 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Adamo, A. et al. 7q11.23 dosage-dependent dysregulation in human pluripotent stem cells affects transcriptional programs in disease-relevant lineages. Nat. Genet. 47, 132–141 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, S.C. et al. A clean, more efficient method for in-solution digestion of protein mixtures without detergent or urea. J. Proteome Res. 5, 3446–3452 (2006). · DOI
- Escher, C. et al. Using iRT, a normalized retention time for more targeted measurement of peptides. Proteomics 12, 1111–1121 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, Y. et al. Glycoproteomic analysis of prostate cancer tissues by SWATH mass spectrometry discovers N-acylethanolamine acid amidase and protein tyrosine kinase 7 as signatures for tumor aggressiveness. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 1753–1768 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Craig, R. & Beavis, R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466–1467 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- Geer, L.Y. et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3, 958–964 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- Kunszt, P. et al. iPortal: the swiss grid proteomics portal: requirements and new features based on experience and usability considerations. Concurr. Comput. 27, 433–445 (2015). · DOI
- Keller, A., Eng, J., Zhang, N., Li, X.J. & Aebersold, R. A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats. Mol. Syst. Biol. 1, 2005.0017 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Shteynberg, D. et al. iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M111.007690 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Schubert, O.T. et al. Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data. Nat. Protoc. 10, 426–441 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Lam, H. et al. Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics 7, 655–667 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Röst, H.L., Aebersold, R. & Schubert, O. Automated SWATH data analysis using targeted extraction of ion chromatograms. Preprint at. bioRxiv http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/044552 (2016). · DOI
Cited by
DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput
Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S., & Ralser, M. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x · Cited by 3,343
Longitudinal multi-omics of host–microbe dynamics in prediabetes
Zhou, W., Sailani, M. R., Contrepois, K., Zhou, Y., Ahadi, S., Leopold, S. R., Zhang, M. J., Rao, V., Avina, M., Mishra, T., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1236-x · Cited by 583
Collins, B. C., Hunter, C. L., Liu, Y., Schilling, B., Rosenberger, G., Bader, S. L., Chan, D. W., Gibson, B. W., Gingras, A.-C., Held, J. M., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00249-5 · Cited by 576
Self-citationSearle, B. C., Pino, L. K., Egertson, J. D., Ting, Y. S., Lawrence, R. T., MacLean, B. X., Villén, J., & MacCoss, M. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07454-w · Cited by 522
Molecular Choreography of Acute Exercise
Contrepois, K., Wu, S., Moneghetti, K. J., Hornburg, D., Ahadi, S., Tsai, M.-S., Metwally, A. A., Wei, E., Lee-McMullen, B., Quijada, J. V., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.043 · Cited by 502
Meier, F., Geyer, P. E., Virreira Winter, S., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0003-5 · Cited by 348
A multicenter study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification
Navarro, P., Kuharev, J., Gillet, L. C., Bernhardt, O. M., MacLean, B., Röst, H. L., Tate, S. A., Tsou, C.-C., Reiter, L., Distler, U., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3685 · Cited by 346
Self-citationMulti-omic measurements of heterogeneity in HeLa cells across laboratories
Liu, Y., Mi, Y., Mueller, T., Kreibich, S., Williams, E. G., Van Drogen, A., Borel, C., Frank, M., Germain, P.-L., Bludau, I., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0037-y · Cited by 338
Self-citationMeyer, J. G., & Schilling, B. (2017) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1080/14789450.2017.1322904 · Cited by 151
Complex‐centric proteome profiling by SEC‐SWATH‐MS
Heusel, M., Bludau, I., Rosenberger, G., Hafen, R., Frank, M., Banaei‐Esfahani, A., van Drogen, A., Collins, B. C., Gstaiger, M., & Aebersold, R. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188438 · Cited by 141
Self-citationSystematic proteome and proteostasis profiling in human trisomy 21 fibroblast cells
Liu, Y., Borel, C., Li, L., Müller, T., Williams, E. G., Germain, P.-L., Buljan, M., Sajic, T., Boersema, P. J., Shao, W., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01422-6 · Cited by 141
Self-citationBreast Cancer Classification Based on Proteotypes Obtained by SWATH Mass Spectrometry
Bouchal, P., Schubert, O. T., Faktor, J., Capkova, L., Imrichova, H., Zoufalova, K., Paralova, V., Hrstka, R., Liu, Y., Ebhardt, H. A., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.046 · Cited by 94
Self-citationÅhrman, E., Hallgren, O., Malmström, L., Hedström, U., Malmström, A., Bjermer, L., Zhou, X.-H., Westergren-Thorsson, G., & Malmström, J. (2018) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2018.02.027 · Cited by 88
Self-citationVowinckel, J., Zelezniak, A., Kibler, A., Bruderer, R., Muelleder, M., Reiter, L., & Ralser, M. (2016) · doi:10.1101/073478 · Cited by 81
Blattmann, P., Henriques, D., Zimmermann, M., Frommelt, F., Sauer, U., Saez-Rodriguez, J., & Aebersold, R. (2017) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2017.11.002 · Cited by 26
Self-citationProteome-wide copy-number estimation from transcriptomics
Sweatt, A. J., Griffiths, C. D., Groves, S. M., Paudel, B. B., Wang, L., Kashatus, D. F., & Janes, K. A. (2024) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/s44320-024-00064-3 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Röst, H. L., Liu, Y., D'Agostino, G., Zanella, M., Navarro, P., Rosenberger, G., Collins, B. C., Gillet, L., Testa, G., Malmström, L., & Aebersold, R.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 777-783
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2498136312
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.