Cited by 187Neural Networks and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain functionUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Deep neural networks in computational neuroscience

Kietzmann, Tim C, McClure, Patrick, Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus·2019·Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The goal of computational neuroscience is to find mechanistic explanations of how the nervous system processes information to give rise to cognitive function and behavior. At the heart of the field are its models, that is, mathematical and computational descriptions of the system being studied, which map sensory stimuli to neural responses and/or neural to behavioral responses. These models range from simple to complex. Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have come to dominate several domains of artificial intelligence (AI). As the term “neural network” suggests, these models are inspired by biological brains. However, current DNNs neglect many details of biological neural networks. These simplifications contribute to their computational efficiency, enabling them to perform complex feats of intelligence, ranging from perceptual (e.g., visual object and auditory speech recognition) to cognitive tasks (e.g., machine translation), and on to motor control (e.g., playing computer games or controlling a robot arm). In addition to their ability to model complex intelligent behaviors, DNNs excel at predicting neural responses to novel sensory stimuli with accuracies well beyond any other currently available model type. DNNs can have millions of parameters, which are required to capture the domain knowledge needed for successful task performance. Contrary to the intuition that this renders them into impenetrable black boxes, the computational properties of the network units are the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.46

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Artificial neural networks have become a prominent tool for understanding neural representations because they provide a language for expressing computational hypotheses about brain function.

    “To make progress in understanding these neural representations, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have become a prominent tool as they provide a language for expressing computational hypotheses about brain function [1–3]”
  • ANNs can also be characterized as having an Umwelt determined by constraints such as architecture, training data, and learning objectives.

    “Note that ANNs can also be characterized as having an Umwelt determined by constraints such as architecture, training data, and learning objectives (Figure 1E) [1–3]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kietzmann, T. C., McClure, P., & Kriegeskorte, N.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Venue
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience
Published
2019-01-25
OpenAlex
W2611715315
Cited by
186
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
deep neural network, computational neuroscience, neural network model, neural response prediction, sensory stimuli, network structure, learning algorithms, input statistics, network visualization, neural representations, black-box interpretability, artificial intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review