Cited by 161Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change

Open access
Schonberg, Tom, Bakkour, Akram, Hover, Ashleigh M, Mumford, Jeanette A, Nagar, Lakshya, Perez, Jacob, Poldrack, Russell A·2014·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

It is believed that choice behavior reveals the underlying value of goods. The subjective values of stimuli can be changed through reward-based learning mechanisms as well as by modifying the description of the decision problem, but it has yet to be shown that preferences can be manipulated by perturbing intrinsic values of individual items. Here we show that the value of food items can be modulated by the concurrent presentation of an irrelevant auditory cue to which subjects must make a simple motor response (i.e., cue-approach training). Follow-up tests showed that the effects of this pairing on choice lasted at least 2 months after prolonged training. Eye-tracking during choice confirmed that cue-approach training increased attention to the cued items. Neuroimaging revealed the neural signature of a value change in the form of amplified preference-related activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3673

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subjective values potentially afford a more sensitive measure of capturing individual differences in motivation.

    “However, preferences vary depending on subject-specific cost–benefit valuations, and SVs potentially afford a more sensitive measure of capturing individual differences in motivation [9, 22, 23, 45].”
  • Preferences vary depending on subject-specific cost-benefit valuations.

    “However, preferences vary depending on subject-specific cost–benefit valuations, and SVs potentially afford a more sensitive measure of capturing individual differences in motivation [9, 22, 23, 45].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Thaler RH Sunstein CR Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness Yale University Press 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schonberg, T., Bakkour, A., Hover, A. M., Mumford, J. A., Nagar, L., Perez, J., & Poldrack, R. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2014-03-09
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
625-630
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2062003768
Cited by
161
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG041653)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
subjective value, value change, reward learning, food preferences, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, attentional bias, choice behavior, auditory cues, motor response, eye tracking
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Choice Behavior, Cues, Eye Movements, Food, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Eye Movement Measurements, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review