Cited by 9Memory and Neural MechanismsSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Replay to remember: a boost from dopamine

Ewell, Laura A, Leutgeb, Stefan·2014·Nature Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3875

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewell, L. A., & Leutgeb, S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Leutgeb, Stefan
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2014-11-21
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
1629-1631
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1986926561
Cited by
9
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dopamine, reward systems, memory consolidation, sleep, memory reactivation, memory traces, novel experience, memory enhancement, artificial stimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Mesencephalon, Spatial Behavior, Dopaminergic Neurons, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review