Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,090

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information

Egner, Tobias, Hirsch, Joy·2005·Nature Neuroscience
DOI 10.1038/nn1594
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1594

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Miller, E.K. & Cohen, J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Logan, G.D. & Zbrodoff, N.J. When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Mem. Cognit. 7, 166–174 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gratton, G., Coles, M.G. & Donchin, E. Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121, 480–506 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  4. MacLeod, C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 109, 163–203 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Kerns, J.G. et al. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303, 1023–1026 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Egner, T. & Hirsch, J. The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. Neuroimage 24, 539–547 (2005). · DOI
  7. Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carter, C.S. et al. Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1944–1948 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Durston, S. et al. Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 20, 2135–2141 (2003). · DOI
  10. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K. & McClelland, J.L. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol. Rev. 97, 332–361 (1990). · DOI
  11. Heinze, H.J. et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372, 543–546 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F.M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G.L. & Petersen, S.E. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 11, 2383–2402 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chawla, D., Rees, G. & Friston, K.J. The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 671–676 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  14. O'Craven, K.M., Downing, P.E. & Kanwisher, N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401, 584–587 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Serences, J.T., Schwarzbach, J., Courtney, S.M., Golay, X. & Yantis, S. Control of object-based attention in human cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 1346–1357 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Wylie, G.R., Javitt, D.C. & Foxe, J.J. Don't think of a white bear: an fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 279–297 (2004). · DOI
  17. O'Craven, K.M. & Kanwisher, N. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 1013–1023 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cox, D., Meyers, E. & Sinha, P. Contextually evoked object-specific responses in human visual cortex. Science 304, 115–117 (2004). · DOI
  19. Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Mangels, J. & Hirsch, J. Mistaking a house for a face: neural correlates of misperception in healthy humans. Cereb. Cortex, published online 2005 07 13 (10.1093/cercor/bhi129). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998). · DOI
  21. Friston, K.J. Functional integration in the brain. in Human Brain Function 2nd edn. (eds. Frackowiak, R.S. et al.) 971–997 (Academic Press, San Diego, 2004). · DOI
  22. Mayr, U., Awh, E. & Laurey, P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 450–452 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Botvinick, M.M., Cohen, J.D. & Carter, C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 539–546 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Nieuwenhuis, S. et al. Accounting for sequential effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Mem. Cognit. (in the press). · DOI
  25. Kastner, S., Pinsk, M.A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R. & Ungerleider, L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 22, 751–761 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Egner, T. & Hirsch, J. Where memory meets attention: neural substrates of negative priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1774–1784 (2005). · DOI
  27. Lavie, N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 451–468 (1995). · DOI
  28. Rees, G., Frith, C.D. & Lavie, N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278, 1616–1619 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hommel, B., Proctor, R.W. & Vu, K.P. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol. Res. 68, 1–17 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sturmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroter, H. & Sommer, W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 1345–1363 (2002). · DOI
  31. Cho, R.Y. et al. Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 283–299 (2002). · DOI
  32. Jones, A.D., Cho, R.Y., Nystrom, L.E., Cohen, J.D. & Braver, T.S. A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: effects of frequency, sequence and conflict. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 300–317 (2002). · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,090

Metadata

Authors
Egner, T., & Hirsch, J.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-11-06
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
1784-1790
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
DOI
10.1038/nn1594
OpenAlex
W2140741071
Cited by
1,090
References
12
FWCI
16.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.