Cited by 120Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Mistaking a house for a face: neural correlates of misperception in healthy humans

Summerfield, Christopher, Egner, Tobias, Mangels, Jennifer, Hirsch, Joy·2006·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Individuals with normal vision can sometimes momentarily mistake one object for another. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we investigated how extrastriate visual regions respond during these erroneous perceptual judgements. Subjects were asked to discriminate images of houses and faces that were degraded such that they were close to an individually defined threshold for perception. On correct trials, voxels localized on the inferior occipital (OFA), fusiform (FFA) and parahippocampal (PPA) gyri exhibited selectivity for face and house images as expected. On incorrect trials, no face- or place-selectivity was observed for OFA or PPA. However, consistent with 'predictive coding' accounts of perception, we observed that the FFA also responded robustly on trials where a house was misperceived as a face, and concurrent activation was observed in medio-frontal and right parietal regions previously implicated in decision making under uncertainty. We suggest that FFA responses during misperception may be driven by a predictive top-down signal from these regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhi129

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive coding holds that top-down predictions suppress prediction errors in lower levels of a hierarchy.

    “Theoretically, this is consistent with predictive coding, where top-down predictions suppress prediction errors in lower levels of a hierarchy”

    From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Summerfield et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Mangels, J., & Hirsch, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Summerfield, Christopher
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2005-07-13
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
500-508
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2128561763
Cited by
120
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R21 066129)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
misunderstanding, face perception, fusiform face area, parahippocampal place area, occipital face area, predictive coding, top-down prediction, decision making under uncertainty, visual perception, neural correlates of perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Discrimination Learning, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reference Values, Statistics as Topic, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review