Cited by 164Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Acute 5-HT Reuptake Blockade Potentiates Human Amygdala Reactivity

Open access
Bigos, Kristin L, Pollock, Bruce G, Aizenstein, Howard J, Fisher, Patrick M, Bies, Robert R, Hariri, Ahmad R·2008·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Variability in serotonin (5-HT) function is associated with individual differences in normal mood and temperament, as well as psychiatric illnesses, all of which are influenced by amygdala function. This study evaluated the acute effects of 5-HT reuptake blockade on amygdala function using pharmacological functional MRI. Eight healthy men completed a double-blind balanced crossover study with the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, citalopram (20 mg infused over 30 min), and normal saline. Amygdala reactivity in response to novel facial expressions was assessed on three successive scans, once before drug/placebo infusion, once early in the infusion, and once at the end of infusion. Acute citalopram administration resulted in concentration-dependent increases in human amygdala reactivity to salient stimuli. The current pattern of 5-HT-mediated amygdala reactivity may represent an important pathway through which SSRIs achieve an antidepressant effect. Intriguingly, our data may also reveal a mechanism contributing to clinical observations of extreme agitation, restlessness, and suicidal ideation in some individuals during acute SSRI treatment. Developing a comprehensive model of how 5-HT modulates human amygdala reactivity supporting behavioral and physiological arousal will be instrumental for our understanding of basic neurobehavioral processes, their dysfunction in psychiatric illnesses, and their contribution to mechanism of treatment response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2008.52

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence following single-dose citalopram treatment on amygdala reactivity is mixed, with both increases and decreases reported.

    “In reality, however, the evidence following single-dose treatment is rather mixed, and both increases in amygdala reactivity52 and decreases53 have been reported; see for example the recent review in ref 54 and metaanalysis in ref 55.”
  • A study found increased activation comparing faces (emotional and neutral) and a sensorimotor control task with citalopram.

    “but increased activation comparing faces (emotional and neutral) and a sensorimotor control task (Bigos et al., 2008).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Bigos et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1995). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I DisordersFPatient Edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bigos, K. L., Pollock, B. G., Aizenstein, H. J., Fisher, P. M., Bies, R. R., & Hariri, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Bigos, Kristin L
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2008-05-07
Volume
33
Issue
13
Pages
3221-3225
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2170045804
Cited by
164
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
  • Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH064678, F31MH076420, K24MH065416, K01MH072837)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB001975)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, MO1RR000056)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
serotonin, citalopram, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, amygdala reactivity, facial expression processing, antidepressant mechanism, SSRI adverse effects, agitation, suicidal ideation
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Anxiety, Brain Chemistry, Depressive Disorder, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Facial Expression, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Serotonin, Citalopram, Akathisia, Drug-Induced, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Presynaptic Terminals, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review