Cited by 876Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neural mechanisms of genetic risk for impulsivity and violence in humans

Open access
Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas, Buckholtz, Joshua W., Kolachana, Bhaskar, R. Hariri, Ahmad, Pezawas, Lukas, Blasi, Giuseppe, Wabnitz, Ashley, Honea, Robyn +5 more·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Neurobiological factors contributing to violence in humans remain poorly understood. One approach to this question is examining allelic variation in the X-linked monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene, previously associated with impulsive aggression in animals and humans. Here, we have studied the impact of a common functional polymorphism in MAOA on brain structure and function assessed with MRI in a large sample of healthy human volunteers. We show that the low expression variant, associated with increased risk of violent behavior, predicted pronounced limbic volume reductions and hyperresponsive amygdala during emotional arousal, with diminished reactivity of regulatory prefrontal regions, compared with the high expression allele. In men, the low expression allele is also associated with changes in orbitofrontal volume, amygdala and hippocampus hyperreactivity during aversive recall, and impaired cingulate activation during cognitive inhibition. Our data identify differences in limbic circuitry for emotion regulation and cognitive control that may be involved in the association of MAOA with impulsive aggression, suggest neural systems-level effects of X-inactivation in human brain, and point toward potential targets for a biological approach toward violence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0511311103

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MAO-A allele is associated with diminished brain circuitry related to impulse control that would promote aggression.

    “The MAO-A allele is associated with diminished brain circuitry related to impulse control that would promote aggression.”

    From Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research (2007) · cites this paper as Meyer-Lindenberg et al. 2006

    The paper reports that the low-expression MAOA allele is associated with impaired cingulate activation during cognitive inhibition and with increased risk of violent behavior (opening summary; page not supplied). Its Discussion proposes that impaired emotional or cognitive control may contribute to violence, but does not establish that the circuitry change would promote aggression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent findings show neural mechanisms through which the genetic influence is likely to operate.

    “For example, recent findings show the neural mechanisms through which the genetic influence is likely to operate (Meyer-Lindenberg et al. 2006).”

    From Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research (2007) · cites this paper as Meyer-Lindenberg et al. 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Buckholtz, J. W., Kolachana, B., R. Hariri, A., Pezawas, L., Blasi, G., Wabnitz, A., Honea, R., Verchinski, B., Callicott, J. H., Egan, M., Mattay, V., & Weinberger, D. R.
Affiliations
  • *Unit for Systems Neuroscience in Psychiatry,
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Neuroimaging Core Facility, and
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-04-18
Volume
103
Issue
16
Pages
6269-6274
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2132089117
Cited by
876
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 58
FWCI
26.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
MAOA gene, monoamine oxidase A, impulsivity, aggression, violence, X-linked polymorphism, X chromosome inactivation, limbic system, orbitofrontal cortex, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, emotion regulation, cognitive control, cognitive inhibition, genetic risk
MeSH terms
Alleles, Emotions, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Limbic System, Male, Monoamine Oxidase, Neurons, Risk, Violence, Gene Expression, X Chromosome Inactivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review