Cited by 79Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Hypocretin receptor 2 antagonism dose-dependently reduces escalated heroin self-administration in rats

Open access
Schmeichel, Brooke E, Barbier, Estelle, Misra, Kaushik K, Contet, Candice, Schlosburg, Joel E, Grigoriadis, Dimitri, Williams, John P, Karlsson, Camilla +4 more·2015·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The hypocretin/orexin (HCRT) system has been associated with both positive and negative drug reinforcement, implicating HCRT receptor 1 (HCRT-R1) signaling in drug-related behaviors for all major drug classes, including opioids. However, to date there are limited studies investigating the role of HCRT receptor 2 (HCRT-R2) signaling in compulsive-like drug seeking. Escalation of drug intake with extended access has been suggested to model the transition from controlled drug use to compulsive-like drug seeking/taking. The current study examined the effects of a HCRT-R2 antagonist, NBI-80713, on heroin self-administration in rats allowed short- (1 h; ShA) or long- (12 h; LgA) access to intravenous heroin self-administration. Results indicate that systemically administered NBI-80713 dose-dependently decreased heroin self-administration in LgA, but not in ShA, animals. Quantitative PCR analyses showed an increase in Hcrtr2 mRNA levels in the central amygdala, a stress-related brain region, of LgA rats. These observations suggest a functional role for HCRT-R2 signaling in compulsive-like heroin self-administration associated with extended access and indicate HCRT-R2 antagonism as a potential pharmacological target for the treatment of heroin dependence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2014.293

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hcrt-2 receptor mRNA levels increased in the CeA in long-access rats.

    “Additionally, an increase in Hcrt-2 receptor mRNA levels in the CeA in longaccess rats was observed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.”

    From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Schmeichel et al., 2015

    The Results section reports that Hcrtr2 mRNA increased in the amygdala of long-access rats, measured by qPCR. The Reverse Transcription and Quantitative PCR section says amygdala substructures were not assessed, so the paper does not establish an increase specifically in the CeA. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Systemic administration of an Hcrt-2 receptor antagonist dose-dependently decreased heroin self-administration in long-access but not short-access animals.

    “The systemic administration of an Hcrt-2 receptor antagonist dose-dependently decreased heroin self-administration in long-access but not in shortaccess animals in an extended-access procedure(Schmeichel et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmeichel, B. E., Barbier, E., Misra, K. K., Contet, C., Schlosburg, J. E., Grigoriadis, D., Williams, J. P., Karlsson, C., Pitcairn, C., Heilig, M., Koob, G. F., & Vendruscolo, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Neurocrine Biosciences (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Schmeichel, Brooke E
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1123-1129
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2008263329
Cited by
79
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA007456, T32AA007456)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K99DA037344, DA004398, DA-004043, R01DA004398, R01DA004043)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
hypocretin receptor 2, heroin self-administration, extended access, compulsive drug seeking, opioid use disorder, central amygdala, drug reinforcement
MeSH terms
Orexin Receptor Antagonists, Animals, Heroin, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drinking Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Heroin Dependence, Locomotion, Male, Narcotics, RNA, Messenger, Self Administration, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Drug-Seeking Behavior, Orexin Receptors, Central Amygdaloid Nucleus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review