Cited by 54Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Effect of Parasympathetic Stimulation on Brain Activity During Appraisal of Fearful Expressions

Open access
Makovac, Elena, Garfinkel, Sarah N, Bassi, Andrea, Basile, Barbara, Macaluso, Emiliano, Cercignani, Mara, Calcagnini, Giovanni, Mattei, Eugenio +5 more·2015·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Autonomic nervous system activity is an important component of human emotion. Mental processes influence bodily physiology, which in turn feeds back to influence thoughts and feelings. Afferent cardiovascular signals from arterial baroreceptors in the carotid sinuses are processed within the brain and contribute to this two-way communication with the body. These carotid baroreceptors can be stimulated non-invasively by externally applying focal negative pressure bilaterally to the neck. In an experiment combining functional neuroimaging (fMRI) with carotid stimulation in healthy participants, we tested the hypothesis that manipulating afferent cardiovascular signals alters the central processing of emotional information (fearful and neutral facial expressions). Carotid stimulation, compared with sham stimulation, broadly attenuated activity across cortical and brainstem regions. Modulation of emotional processing was apparent as a significant expression-by-stimulation interaction within left amygdala, where responses during appraisal of fearful faces were selectively reduced by carotid stimulation. Moreover, activity reductions within insula, amygdala, and hippocampus correlated with the degree of stimulation-evoked change in the explicit emotional ratings of fearful faces. Across participants, individual differences in autonomic state (heart rate variability, a proxy measure of autonomic balance toward parasympathetic activity) predicted the extent to which carotid stimulation influenced neural (amygdala) responses during appraisal and subjective rating of fearful faces. Together our results provide mechanistic insight into the visceral component of emotion by identifying the neural substrates mediating cardiovascular influences on the processing of fear signals, potentially implicating central baroreflex mechanisms for anxiolytic treatment targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2015.10

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dimensional model of interoception can be extended further to incorporate lower level measures of afferent neural traffic and the preconscious impact of interoceptive signals on sensory processing.

    “This dimensional model of interoception can be extended further to incorporate lower level measures of afferent neural traffic (quantifying afferent signal strength, e.g. through heartbeat evoked potentials [20 ]), and the preconscious impact of interoceptive signals on sensory processing (e.g.modification of startle response [21 ,22] or augmentation of threat processing [23 ,24,25]).”

    From Interoception and emotion. (2017) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion reports that carotid baroreceptor stimulation affected the processing and appraisal of fearful faces, supporting an impact of afferent signals on threat processing. But the paper's own findings describe attenuated, not augmented, responses to fearful faces during appraisal; it also does not establish that this effect was preconscious. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A cardiac cycle by emotion interaction demonstrated enhanced bilateral amygdala activation in response to fear faces at systole.

    “A cardiac cycle by emotion interaction demonstrated enhanced bilateral amygdala activation in response to fear faces at systole (b).”

    From Interoception and emotion. (2017) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results section ('Interaction between carotid stimulation and emotional rating condition'; page unavailable) reports an emotion-by-stimulation interaction in the left amygdala during appraisal of fearful faces. It does not report a cardiac-cycle interaction or enhanced bilateral amygdala activation at systole; the reported effect was attenuation during carotid stimulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Baroreceptor signals amplify threat processing, enhancing the detection and perception of fear signals in others.

    “However, these baroreceptor signals amplify threat processing, enhancing the detection and perception of fear signals in others [23 ,24,25]”

    From Interoception and emotion. (2017) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports enhanced fear processing when stimuli coincide with natural baroreceptor firing during systole. But it also reports that this paper’s artificial carotid stimulation attenuated amygdala activity during appraisal of fearful faces. The unqualified claim that baroreceptor signals amplify threat processing therefore overstates what this source supports. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Carotid artery stimulation leads to higher ratings of emotional expression intensity, and this increase for fearful faces is associated with decreased activation in the insula, amygdala, and periaqueductal grey area.

    “carotid artery stimulation in this study led to higher ratings of emotional expression intensity, and this increase for fearful faces was associated with a decrease in activation in a number of brain areas including the insula, amygdala, and periaqueductal grey area.”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Makovac et al., 2015

    The Behavioural results section (page unavailable) reports higher intensity ratings with stimulation for neutral faces, but no overall increase for fearful faces; fearful-face ratings rose in some participants and fell in others. The Correlations with emotional ratings section links changes in fearful-face ratings to attenuation of activity in the insula, amygdala and periaqueductal grey area, but does not support describing that relationship simply as an increase in fearful-face ratings associated with decreased activation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]3. Basile B, Bassi A, Calcagnini G, Caltagirone C, Bozzali M (2013b). Effect of parasympathetic stimulation on brain activity during emotional processing. Proceedings of the Human Brain Mapping annual meeting.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makovac, E., Garfinkel, S. N., Bassi, A., Basile, B., Macaluso, E., Cercignani, M., Calcagnini, G., Mattei, E., Agalliu, D., Cortelli, P., Caltagirone, C., Bozzali, M., & Critchley, H.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Makovac, Elena
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-01-12
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1649-1658
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2014798867
Cited by
54
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Sussex (ERC-2012-ADG_20120411)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
parasympathetic nervous system, carotid baroreceptor stimulation, fear, amygdala, insula, hippocampus, heart rate variability, autonomic nervous system, emotional processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review