Cited by 205Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Heart rate response after emotional picture presentation is modulated by interoceptive awareness

Pollatos, Olga, Herbert, Beate M., Matthias, Ellen, Schandry, Rainer·2007·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

The perception of visceral signals plays a crucial role in many theories of emotions. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience and heart rate responses in an emotional stimulation paradigm. Based on their performance in a heartbeat perception task 38 participants (16 males, 22 females) were classified as subjects with either high (n=19; 8 males) or low interoceptive awareness (n=19; 8 males). 120 pictures (40 pleasant, 40 unpleasant, 40 neutral slides) from the International Affective Picture System served as emotional stimuli. Heart rate changes were recorded during baseline and during slide presentation. After each slide, the subjects had to rate emotional valence and arousal on a 9-point self-report scale. Statistical analyses revealed significantly stronger heart rate responses to pleasant and unpleasant stimuli in subjects with high interoceptive awareness. Furthermore, subjects with high interoceptive awareness rated pleasant and unpleasant slides as significantly more arousing; no differences were found in the emotional valence ratings. Heartbeat perception scores correlated significantly positive with both the mean arousal rating and with the mean heart rate changes. Our results demonstrate a strong relationship between the perception of cardiac signals and the peripheral processing of emotional stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollatos, O., Herbert, B. M., Matthias, E., & Schandry, R.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Pollatos, Olga
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
117-124
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011392044
Cited by
205
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
interoceptive awareness, heart rate, emotional arousal, emotional valence, heartbeat perception, autonomic nervous system
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Awareness, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review