Cited by 385Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Positive and negative emotional verbal stimuli elicit activity in the left amygdala

Hamann, Stephan, Mao, Hui·2002·Neuroreport

Abstract

The human amygdala's involvement in negative emotion is well established, but relatively little is known regarding its role in positive emotion. Here we examined the neural response to emotionally positive, negative, and neutral words using fMRI. Relative to neutral words, positive and negative emotional words elicited greater activity in the left amygdala. Positive but not negative words elicited activity in dorsal and ventral striatal regions which have been linked in previous neuroimaging studies to reward and positive affect, including caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, and accumbens. These findings provide the first direct evidence that the amygdala is involved in emotional reactions elicited by both positive and negative emotional words, and further indicate that positive words additionally activate brain regions related to reward.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200201210-00008

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amygdala is thought to reflect the encoding and generation of responses to negatively and positively arousing cues.

    “This is because the amygdala is thought to reflect the encoding and generation of responses to negatively and positively arousing cues (Anderson et al., 2003; Garavan, Pendergrass, Ross, Stein, & Risinger, 2001; Hamann & Mao, 2002).”

    From Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal (2008) · cites this paper as Hamann & Mao, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamann, S., & Mao, H.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2002-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
15-19
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087889245
Cited by
385
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
amygdala, positive emotions, negative emotions, emotional words, reward processing, striatum, caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, nucleus accumbens, emotional valence
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Behavior, Corpus Striatum, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reading, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review