Cited by 103Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Contrasting Roles of Dopamine and Noradrenaline in the Motivational Properties of Social Play Behavior in Rats

Open access
Achterberg, E J Marijke, van Kerkhof, Linda W M, Servadio, Michela, van Swieten, Maaike M H, Houwing, Danielle J, Aalderink, Mandy, Driel, Nina V, Trezza, Viviana +1 more·2016·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Social play behavior, abundant in the young of most mammalian species, is thought to be important for social and cognitive development. Social play is highly rewarding, and as such, the expression of social play depends on its pleasurable and motivational properties. Since the motivational properties of social play have only sporadically been investigated, we developed a setup in which rats responded for social play under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Dopaminergic neurotransmission plays a key role in incentive motivational processes, and both dopamine and noradrenaline have been implicated in the modulation of social play behavior. Therefore, we investigated the role of dopamine and noradrenaline in the motivation for social play. Treatment with the psychostimulant drugs methylphenidate and cocaine increased responding for social play, but suppressed its expression during reinforced play periods. The dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR-12909 increased responding for social play, but did not affect its expression, whereas the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine decreased responding for social play as well as its expression. The effects of methylphenidate and cocaine on responding for social play, but not their play-suppressant effects, were blocked by pretreatment with the dopamine receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol. In contrast, pretreatment with the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist RX821002 prevented the play-suppressant effect of methylphenidate, but left its effect on responding for social play unaltered. In sum, the present study introduces a novel method to study the incentive motivational properties of social play behavior in rats. Using this paradigm, we demonstrate dissociable roles for dopamine and noradrenaline in social play behavior: dopamine stimulates the motivation for social play, whereas noradrenaline negatively modulates the motivation for social play behavior and its expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2015.212

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mesolimbic dopamine activity affects not just the launching of nape attacks but also the motivation to engage in play.

    “That mesolimbic dopamine activity does not just affect the launching of nape attacks, but also the motivation to engage in play, has been shown by operant conditioning methods”

    From The rough-and-tumble play of rats as a natural behavior suitable for studying the social brain (2022) · cites this paper as Achterberg et al., 2016

    The ‘Dissociable Roles of Dopamine and Noradrenaline in Social Play Motivation and Expression’ section reports that dopamine-enhancing drugs increased operant responding for social play, supporting an effect on motivation. The ‘Operant Conditioning’ section identifies pouncing as an attempt to contact a partner’s nape, and the study measures it separately. But the drugs were not targeted to the mesolimbic pathway, so the study does not directly establish the claim’s regional specificity. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Systemic administration of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine decreases responding for social play and decreases the expression of social play.

    “systemic administration of the NE reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine decreased responding for social play and decreased the expression of social play [9].”
  • Systemic administration of drugs enhancing dopamine signaling increases reinforcement responding for social play, and these effects are blocked by non-specific dopamine receptor antagonists.

    “systemic administration of drugs enhancing DA signaling increased reinforcement responding for social play, and these effects were blocked by administration of non-specific DA receptor antagonists [9].”
  • Dopamine manipulations affect how hard rats will work for the reward of access to a playmate.

    “in which dopamine manipulations affect how hard rats will work for the reward of access to a playmate (Achterberg et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pellis SM, Pellis VC (2009). The Playful Brain. OneWorld Publications: Oxford, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achterberg, E. J. M., van Kerkhof, L. W. M., Servadio, M., van Swieten, M. M. H., Houwing, D. J., Aalderink, M., Driel, N. V., Trezza, V., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
Corresponding author
Vanderschuren, Louk J M J
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
858-868
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W1548490952
Cited by
103
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (293589)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022628)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social play, dopamine, norepinephrine, incentive motivation, reward, methylphenidate, cocaine, GBR 12909, atomoxetine, dopamine uptake inhibition, norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, alpha-flupenthixol, alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists, progressive ratio schedule, rats
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Animals, Cocaine, Conditioning, Operant, Dopamine, Flupenthixol, Male, Methylphenidate, Motivation, Neuropsychological Tests, Norepinephrine, Piperazines, Random Allocation, Receptors, Dopamine, Social Behavior, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2, Dopamine Antagonists, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Idazoxan, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review