Cited by 112Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Blunted Endogenous Opioid Release Following an Oral Amphetamine Challenge in Pathological Gamblers

Open access
Mick, Inge, Myers, Jim, Ramos, Anna C, Stokes, Paul R A, Erritzoe, David, Colasanti, Alessandro, Gunn, Roger N, Rabiner, Eugenii A +9 more·2016·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Pathological gambling is a psychiatric disorder and the first recognized behavioral addiction, with similarities to substance use disorders but without the confounding effects of drug-related brain changes. Pathophysiology within the opioid receptor system is increasingly recognized in substance dependence, with higher mu-opioid receptor (MOR) availability reported in alcohol, cocaine and opiate addiction. Impulsivity, a risk factor across the addictions, has also been found to be associated with higher MOR availability. The aim of this study was to characterize baseline MOR availability and endogenous opioid release in pathological gamblers (PG) using [(11)C]carfentanil PET with an oral amphetamine challenge. Fourteen PG and 15 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent two [(11)C]carfentanil PET scans, before and after an oral administration of 0.5 mg/kg of d-amphetamine. The change in [(11)C]carfentanil binding between baseline and post-amphetamine scans (ΔBPND) was assessed in 10 regions of interest (ROI). MOR availability did not differ between PG and HV groups. As seen previously, oral amphetamine challenge led to significant reductions in [(11)C]carfentanil BPND in 8/10 ROI in HV. PG demonstrated significant blunting of opioid release compared with HV. PG also showed blunted amphetamine-induced euphoria and alertness compared with HV. Exploratory analysis revealed that impulsivity positively correlated with caudate baseline BPND in PG only. This study provides the first evidence of blunted endogenous opioid release in PG. Our findings are consistent with growing evidence that dysregulation of endogenous opioids may have an important role in the pathophysiology of addictions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2015.340

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mick, I., Myers, J., Ramos, A. C., Stokes, P. R. A., Erritzoe, D., Colasanti, A., Gunn, R. N., Rabiner, E. A., Searle, G. E., Waldman, A. D., Parkin, M. C., Brailsford, A. D., Galduróz, J. C. F., Bowden-Jones, H., Clark, L., Nutt, D. J., & Lingford-Hughes, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Lingford-Hughes, Anne R
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-11-10
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
1742-1750
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2205787010
Cited by
112
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2013-21-501, CL-2013-17-003)
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
gambling addiction, endogenous opioid release, amphetamine challenge, impulsivity, caudate nucleus, behavioral addiction, euphoria, alertness
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analgesics, Opioid, Analysis of Variance, Carbon Isotopes, Female, Fentanyl, Gambling, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review