Cited by 35Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Binge eating disorder and morbid obesity are associated with lowered mu-opioid receptor availability in the brain

Open access
Joutsa, Juho, Karlsson, Henry K., Majuri, Joonas, Nuutila, Pirjo, Helin, Semi, Kaasinen, Valtteri, Nummenmaa, Lauri·2018·Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging

Abstract

Both morbid obesity and binge eating disorder (BED) have previously been linked with aberrant brain opioid function. Behaviorally these two conditions are however different suggesting also differences in neurotransmitter function. Here we directly compared mu-opioid receptor (MOR) availability between morbidly obese and BED subjects. Seven BED and nineteen morbidly obese (non-BED) patients, and thirty matched control subjects underwent positron emission tomography (PET) with MOR-specific ligand [11 C]carfentanil. Both subjects with morbid obesity and BED had widespread reduction in [11 C]carfentanil binding compared to control subjects. However, there was no significant difference in brain MOR binding between subjects with morbid obesity and BED. Thus, our results indicate that there is common brain opioid abnormality in behaviorally different eating disorders involving obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.03.006

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joutsa, J., Karlsson, H. K., Majuri, J., Nuutila, P., Helin, S., Kaasinen, V., & Nummenmaa, L.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Joutsa, Juho
Venue
Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
276
Pages
41-45
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791824613
Cited by
35
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (#304385, #256836, #295580)
  • Finnish Medical Foundation
  • Finnish Alcohol Research Foundation
  • Turku University Hospital
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
binge eating disorder, morbid obesity, mu-opioid receptor, [11C]carfentanil, eating disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Brain, Female, Fentanyl, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Positron-Emission Tomography, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review