Cited by 409Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

Mass spectrometry of intact membrane protein complexes

Open access
Laganowsky, Arthur, Reading, Eamonn, Hopper, Jonathan T S, Robinson, Carol V·2013·Nature Protocols

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) of intact soluble protein complexes has emerged as a powerful technique to study the stoichiometry, structure-function and dynamics of protein assemblies. Recent developments have extended this technique to the study of membrane protein complexes, where it has already revealed subunit stoichiometries and specific phospholipid interactions. Here we describe a protocol for MS of membrane protein complexes. The protocol begins with the preparation of the membrane protein complex, enabling not only the direct assessment of stoichiometry, delipidation and quality of the target complex but also the evaluation of the purification strategy. A detailed list of compatible nonionic detergents is included, along with a protocol for screening detergents to find an optimal one for MS, biochemical and structural studies. This protocol also covers the preparation of lipids for protein-lipid binding studies and includes detailed settings for a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer after the introduction of complexes from gold-coated nanoflow capillaries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2013.024

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Membrane proteins generally require nonionic surfactants such as DDM or oligoglycerol detergents for native MS analysis.

    “Due to the hydrophobic nature of membrane proteins, the use of nonionic surfactants, such as DDM or the recently developed oligoglycerol class of detergents (shown to improve purification and MS-based characterization of G-protein coupled receptors) [47], to solubilize and stabilize membrane proteins is generally required to enable native MS analysis [48–50].”
  • In native MS of protein-micelle complexes, the complex is ionized and the protein is liberated from the surfactant micelle using high collisional energy.

    “In this case, the entire protein-micelle complex is ionized, and the protein is liberated from the surfactant micelle using high collisional energy in the mass spectrometer [49].”
  • Nonionic detergents such as DDM are generally considered MS-compatible and have been used to maintain higher-order structures of membrane protein complexes in native MS.

    “Nonionic detergents such as n-Dodecyl-β-D-Maltoside (DDM) have been generally considered MS-compatible, and have even been used for maintaining higher-order structures of membrane protein complexes in native MS.21”
  • Complex-down analysis has been extended to membrane proteins by adding detergents or lipids in solution to prevent protein precipitation and preserve native structure.

    “Recently, this technique has been extended to membrane proteins by adding detergents or lipids in the solution to prevent protein precipitation and to preserve their native structure.”
  • Carefully tuned collisional activation is used to eject intact membrane protein complexes from detergent micelles so that the membrane protein can be efficiently analysed.

    “Carefully tuned collisional activation is used to eject intact membrane protein complexes from detergent micelles so that the membrane protein can be efficiently analysed.108”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laganowsky, A., Reading, E., Hopper, J. T. S., & Robinson, C. V.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Carol V
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2013-03-07
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
639-651
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2030533925
Cited by
409
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 7
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (088150)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
membrane protein complexes, subunit stoichiometry, delipidation, nonionic detergents, detergent screening, phospholipid interactions, protein-lipid binding, quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry, protein complex purification
MeSH terms
Detergents, Indicators and Reagents, Membrane Proteins, Phospholipids, Protein Binding, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Structure, Tertiary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review