Cited by 22CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseVirus-based gene therapy research

Efficient genetic editing of human intestinal organoids using ribonucleoprotein-based CRISPR

Open access
Skoufou-Papoutsaki, Nefeli, Adler, Sam, D'Santos, Paula, Mannion, Liz, Mehmed, Shenay, Kemp, Richard, Smith, Amy, Perrone, Francesca +4 more·2023·Disease Models & Mechanisms

Abstract

Organoids, combined with genetic editing strategies, have the potential to offer rapid and efficient investigation of gene function in many models of human disease. However, to date, the editing efficiency of organoids with the use of non-viral electroporation methods has only been up to 30%, with implications for the subsequent need for selection, including turnaround time and exhaustion or adaptation of the organoid population. Here, we describe an efficient method for intestinal organoid editing using a ribonucleoprotein-based CRISPR approach. Editing efficiencies of up to 98% in target genes were robustly achieved across different gut anatomical locations and developmental timepoints from multiple patient samples with no observed off-target editing. The method allowed us to study the effect of loss of the tumour suppressor gene PTEN in normal human intestinal cells. Analysis of PTEN-deficient organoids defined phenotypes that likely relate to its tumour suppressive function in vivo, such as a proliferative advantage and increased organoid budding. Transcriptional profiling revealed differential expression of genes in pathways commonly known to be associated with PTEN loss, including mTORC1 activation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A ribonucleoprotein-based CRISPR electroporation method edited human intestinal organoids with up to 98% knockout efficiency across gut regions, developmental stages, and patients without selection. PTEN knockout organoids showed proliferative advantage, increased budding, and transcriptomic changes including mTORC1 enrichment.

Key findings

  • RNP CRISPR achieved up to 98% PTEN knockout in duodenum, terminal ileum, and sigmoid colon organoids from multiple patients, stable over 3 weeks; no off-target editing was observed outside the expected PTENP1 pseudogene.
  • PTEN KO organoids had increased area (P=0.0112), more buds (P<0.0001), and more MCM2-positive cycling cells (P=0.0002); in a 50:50 competition assay, KO cells took over within 3 weeks.
  • RNA-seq of three isogenic WT/PTEN KO pairs found 730 differentially expressed genes (290 upregulated, 440 downregulated, FDR<0.05), with enrichment of PI3K-AKT, MAPK, CRC, and mTORC1 pathways (mTORC1 enrichment score 0.44; P=0.047).
  • ARID1A knockout was also efficient and reduced BRM but not BRG1 protein levels.

Methods

  • Human intestinal biopsies were collected from children under 16 undergoing colonoscopy (sigmoid colon, terminal ileum, duodenum) and foetal intestine at 8–12 weeks’ gestation; organoids were cultured in WENRAFI medium.
  • Editing used synthetic guide RNAs complexed with Cas9 v2 RNP, electroporated into 100,000 cells with Lonza P3 buffer and the Amaxa 4D Nucleofector DS-138 programme; guides were designed with Benchling/Indelphi and tested in MDA-MB-231 cells.
  • Knockout was scored by Sanger sequencing with ICE and targeted-amplicon NGS; phenotyping included wholemount staining, immunohistochemistry, Wes protein analysis, competition and conditioned-medium assays, and bulk RNA-seq analysed with DESeq2, KEGG, and GSEA.

Limitations

  • The paper states the method was not tested in different epithelial organoid systems, although it is expected to translate.
  • One WT RNA-seq sample (T561) consistently failed library preparation and was excluded.
  • Evident from the text: many assays used small sample sizes (n=2–4), and off-target analysis was limited to top predicted regions including PTENP1, two intergenic sites, and EBNA1BP2.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dmm.050279

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

13 of 21 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    RNP methods show a 2.5- to 28-fold reduction in off-target effects compared to plasmid-based methods.

    “More specifically, a 2.5- to 28-fold reduction in off-target effects has been reported with an RNP method compared to plasmid-based methods (Liang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Liang et al., 2015 source
    • cites Zhang et al., 2021 source

      The Conclusions and perspectives section says direct RNP delivery has lower off-target effects than Cas9 plasmid delivery. It does not report the claimed 2.5- to 28-fold reduction, so the quantitative part is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    p-AKT (Ser473) was elevated in PTEN KO organoids.

    “A downstream target of PTEN, phosphorylated (p)-AKT, previously described as increased upon PTEN loss (Takao et al., 2018), was confirmed to be elevated in PTEN KO organoids (Fig. 2K).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Takao et al., 2018 source
  • Findingown data

    The optimal electroporation condition for human intestinal organoids was 100,000 cells with the DS-138 programme using Lonza P3 buffer.

    “The optimal condition was the use of 100,000 cells with the DS-138 programme using Lonza P3 buffer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    PTEN KO nuclei were larger than WT nuclei.

    “The size of a cell is known to be proportionate to the size of its nucleus (Edens et al., 2013), and, indeed, PTEN KO nuclei were found to be larger than WT nuclei (Fig. S2E), in line with the predicted effect of mTORC1 activation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Even with NGS, the frequency of WT alleles across edited samples was only up to 3%.

    “Even with this more sensitive sequencing method, the frequency of WT alleles across the edited samples was only up to 3% (Fig. 2F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims. 28
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Viral methods for introducing genome editing components into cells could traditionally reach efficiencies of 30-50%, but recent modifications have achieved 80-100%.

    “Viral methods could traditionally reach efficiencies of 30-50%, but more recent modifications of the transduction method have achieved efficiencies of 80-100% (Pirona et al., 2020; Gu et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pirona et al., 2020 source
    • cites Gu et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Germline variants in PTEN are causative of PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome.

    “It is an important tumour suppressor gene mutated in 6% of colorectal cancers (CRCs), and germline variants in PTEN are causative of PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome (Hobert and Eng, 2009; Cerami et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hobert and Eng, 2009 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    mTORC1 is important for controlling cell size, with activated mTORC1 leading to larger cells.

    “mTORC1 is also known to be important for controlling cell size, with activated mTORC1 leading to larger cells (Fingar et al., 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fingar et al., 2002 source

      The Discussion reports that inhibiting mTOR reduces cell size, and the section “mTOR- and PI3K-mediated cell growth continues when cell cycle progression is blocked” reports that mTOR-dependent signaling is needed for cells to grow larger. The paper does not identify the signaling complex as mTORC1 or show that activating it makes cells larger; its direct evidence concerns inhibition and restoration of mTOR signaling. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    PTEN is an important tumour suppressor gene mutated in 6% of colorectal cancers.

    “It is an important tumour suppressor gene mutated in 6% of colorectal cancers (CRCs), and germline variants in PTEN are causative of PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome (Hobert and Eng, 2009; Cerami et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hobert and Eng, 2009 source

      The overview identifies PTEN as a tumor suppressor and says germline PTEN mutations cause Cowden syndrome, a PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (opening section; page not specified). It does not report that PTEN is mutated in 6% of colorectal cancers; searches for that figure and colorectal cancer mutation frequency found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cerami et al., 2012 source

      The indexed passage on protein and phosphoprotein analysis (page unavailable) discusses PTEN deletion in ovarian cancer and notes that colorectal cancer data are available, but gives no PTEN mutation frequency for colorectal cancer. Searches for PTEN, colorectal cancer, and 6% found no passage calling PTEN a tumour suppressor or supporting the claimed 6% figure. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Viral methods have associated biosafety and permanent integration issues, whereas non-viral methods are simpler and minimise the time required for production of viral particles.

    “However, viral methods have associated biosafety and permanent integration issues, whereas non-viral methods are simpler, minimising the time required for the production of the viral particles, which can take up to 2-3 months (Lin et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2022 source

      The Introduction’s “Comparison with other genome modification methods” section says electroporation avoids the labor and time needed to produce lentivirus. It does not identify biosafety or permanent integration as problems, and says lentiviral transduction can be easier in laboratories without the specified screening methods. The Timing section gives lentivirus packaging and concentration steps lasting days, not 2–3 months (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    mTORC1 is an important regulator of cell proliferation and metabolism.

    “This pathway is an important regulator of cell proliferation and metabolism (Hay and Sonenberg, 2004; Guertin and Sabatini, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hay and Sonenberg, 2004 source

      The Abstract and the section on mTOR translational control, cell growth, and proliferation describe mTOR as a regulator of cell proliferation. The sections on upstream regulators and control by energy metabolism chiefly describe nutrients and cellular energy regulating mTOR, rather than establishing that mTORC1 regulates metabolism. Our copy therefore supports the proliferation part but not the metabolism part as stated. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Guertin and Sabatini, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    RNP-based CRISPR eliminates the need to translate Cas9 and has reduced off-target effects.

    “This approach eliminates the need to translate the Cas9 protein and has reduced off-target effects (Kim et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Three guide RNAs were designed per target using Benchling and Indelphi, and guides with predicted high on-target (>40), off-target (>80) and frameshift (>80%) scores were selected, preferentially targeting an early exon of the gene.

    “Three guide RNAs were designed per target using Benchling and Indelphi (Shen et al., 2018). Guides with predicted high on-target (>40), off-target (>80) and frameshift (>80%) scores were selected, preferentially targeting an early exon of the gene.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shen et al., 2018 source

      The Introduction and Results describe using inDelphi to design and select guide RNAs based on predicted editing outcomes. Our copy does not say that the guides were designed using Benchling or that three were designed per target. The score thresholds and early-exon preference appear in a separate, uncited sentence and are not part of this verdict. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Enrichment of mammary branching during breast development was implicated in PTEN KO organoids, with three of six genes (AREG, PHB2 and TGFB1) known to be involved being differentially expressed.

    “Finally, in terms of processes that might relate to the increased budding phenotype, enrichment of the mammary branching during breast development was implicated in the PTEN KO organoids, with three of six genes (AREG, PHB2 and TGFB1) known to be involved in the process being differentially expressed (Fig. S2F).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PTEN editing efficiencies of up to 98% were seen in three different patients and gut segments-duodenum, terminal ileum and sigmoid colon-and remained stable over 3 weeks in culture.

    “Efficiencies of up to 98% were seen in three different patients and gut segments – duodenum, terminal ileum and sigmoid colon – and remained stable over 3 weeks in culture (Fig. 2C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Protein levels of BRM, but not BRG1, were reduced in ARID1A KO organoids, demonstrating a functional consequence of ARID1A loss.

    “Of note, protein levels of BRM, but not BRG1, were reduced, demonstrating a functional consequence of ARID1A loss (Fig. 2N).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: ARID1A acts to regulate ATPases BRM and BRG1 of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complexes, which are present in mutually exclusive complexes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Gene edits remained constant over time in culture, and editing was restricted to regions with 100% sequence homology with the guide RNA.

    “Gene edits remained constant over time in culture, and the editing was restricted to regions with 100% sequence homology with the guide RNA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a general enrichment of regulation of cell proliferation processes, with TGFB1 and GCNT2 differentially expressed.

    “There was a general enrichment of the regulation of cell proliferation processes, with some important genes, such as TGFB1 and GCNT2, being differentially expressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Anticipated editing of the PTEN pseudogene PTENP1 was observed, but none of the other tested predicted off-target areas were targeted, with all reads being WT.

    “The anticipated editing of the PTEN pseudogene was observed, but none of the other areas were targeted by the guide RNA, with all the reads being of the WT sequence (Fig. 2H).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The generation of an ARID1A genetic KO demonstrated a reduction in BRM but not BRG1, which has not, to our knowledge, been previously identified.

    “The generation of an ARID1A genetic KO demonstrated a reduction in the levels of one of the two downstream active mediators, BRM but not BRG1, which has not, to our knowledge, been previously identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: ARID1A acts to regulate ATPases BRM and BRG1 of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complexes, which are present in mutually exclusive complexes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Focal adhesion was the top downregulated pathway in PTEN KO organoids (log FC <−0.7), while fatty acid degradation and tyrosine metabolism were among the most highly upregulated pathways (log FC >0.7).

    “When focusing on the genes with the highest fold changes, focal adhesion was the top downregulated pathway in PTEN KO organoids (log FC <−0.7), while alternative metabolic pathways, such as fatty acid degradation and tyrosine metabolism, were included in the most highly upregulated pathways (log FC >0.7) (Fig. 4H; Fig. S2A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Previous studies described downregulation of focal adhesion formations in NIH3T3 cell lines engineered to overexpress PTEN, in apparent contradiction to the effect shown here, where the same effect resulted from PTEN loss.

    “These studies described the downregulation of focal adhesion formations in NIH3T3 cell lines engineered to overexpress PTEN, in apparent contradiction to the effect shown here, where the same effect resulted from PTEN loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tamura et al., 1998 source
    • cites Tamura et al., 1999
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    For non-viral methods, electroporation results in higher organoid-editing efficiencies.

    “For the non-viral methods, electroporation has been found to result in higher organoid-editing efficiencies (Fujii et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fujii et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The RNP-based CRISPR method was extremely robust, working with similar efficiencies for organoids from different gut segments, developmental timepoints, multiple patients and different target genes.

    “The RNP-based CRISPR method was shown to be extremely robust, working with similar efficiencies for organoids taken from gut segments of different anatomical locations and developmental timepoints from multiple patients and for different target genes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    PTEN contains a highly conserved pseudogene, PTENP1, located at chromosome 9p21, with 98% sequence homology with the coding region of functional PTEN.

    “Of note, PTEN contains a highly conserved pseudogene, PTENP1, located at chromosome 9p21, with 98% sequence homology with the coding region of functional PTEN (Dahia et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dahia et al., 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    PTEN KO cells outcompete WT cells in a cell-autonomous way, with a likely contribution from increased proliferation.

    “No effect on the WT organoid numbers or their size was observed, suggesting that PTEN KO cells outcompete WT cells in a cell-autonomous way, with a likely contribution from increased proliferation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The findings confirmed high KO efficiency with different gut segments, organoids from different developmental timings and different guide RNAs.

    “These findings confirmed high KO efficiency with different gut segments, organoids from different developmental timings and different guide RNAs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The efficiency of the genome editing method described here was similar to viral delivery methods, without the associated biohazard and mutagenesis issues.

    “The efficiency of the genome editing method described here was similar to viral delivery methods, without the associated biohazard and mutagenesis issues.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Principal component analysis clustered organoids based on originating patient rather than genotype, suggesting a strong patient effect.

    “Principal component analysis clustered organoids based on the originating patient rather than the genotype, suggesting a strong patient effect, which was incorporated in the differential expression model (Fig. 4F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The takeover of PTEN KO cells suggests a direct proliferative advantage or possibly that they act to inhibit the growth of WT organoids.

    “Indeed, after mixing PTEN KO cells with WT cells in a 50:50 ratio, the KO cells completely took over within 3 weeks in culture, suggesting a direct proliferative advantage or possibly that they act to inhibit the growth of WT organoids.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    PTENP1 was predicted to be targeted by the designed PTEN guide RNAs owing to high sequence homology.

    “Based on the online design tool, PTENP1 was also predicted to be targeted with the designed guide RNAs owing to this high sequence homology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The knockout efficiency of guide RNAs was first assessed in cells, and the guide yielding the highest knockout per gene was taken forward for use in organoids.

    “Their KO efficiency was first assessed in cells. The guide yielding the highest KO per gene was taken forward for use in organoids.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The guide RNA that yields the highest knockout efficiency in cells will also yield the highest knockout efficiency in organoids.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All clinical investigations were conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “All clinical investigations were conducted in accordance to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A negative, no-Cas9 control and at least three technical replicates were always included in electroporation experiments.

    “A negative, no-Cas9, control and at least three technical replicates were always included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Morphological and transcriptomic characterisation of PTEN KO organoids validated the editing event, with previously reported changes in signalling pathways and processes associated with loss of PTEN also seen in the organoid model.

    “The morphological and transcriptomic characterisation of the PTEN KO organoids validated the editing event, with previously reported changes in signalling pathways and processes associated with loss of PTEN also seen in the organoid model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    DNA from three patients and two technical replicates, over three timepoints, was subjected to targeted amplicon NGS.

    “DNA from three patients and two technical replicates, over three timepoints, was subjected to targeted amplicon NGS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Avoiding the need for selection following gene editing serves to minimise the time required for expansion and retains more of this biological diversity.

    “Avoiding the need for selection following gene editing serves to minimise the time required for expansion and retains more of this biological diversity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Primary organoid cultures contain much of the diversity present in the donor.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    One of the WT samples (T561) consistently failed the library preparation and was excluded from RNA-seq analysis.

    “One of the WT samples (T561) consistently failed the library preparation and was excluded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Loss of PTEN was associated with a proliferative advantage, metabolic rewiring and reduction in the process of focal adhesion.

    “Loss of PTEN was associated with a proliferative advantage, metabolic rewiring and reduction in the process of focal adhesion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was conducted with informed patient and/or carer consent as appropriate and with full ethical approval (REC-12/EE/0265).

    “This study was conducted with informed patient and/or carer consent as appropriate, and with full ethical approval (REC-12/EE/0265).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This difference demonstrates the need to test gene, and cancer driver, functions in biologically relevant contexts, such as primary organoids that can be efficiently gene edited.

    “This difference demonstrates the need to test gene, and cancer driver, functions in biologically relevant contexts, such as those provided by primary organoids that can be efficiently gene edited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Foetal intestine was obtained with informed consent and ethical approval (REC-96/085) from elective terminations at 8-12 weeks' gestational age.

    “Foetal intestine was obtained with informed consent, and with ethical approval (REC-96/085), from elective terminations at 8-12 weeks’ gestational age.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The method employed here avoids the need for clonal selection, so any tumour suppressor gene can be mutated to determine its functional role at different stages of the neoplastic process.

    “The method employed here avoids the need for clonal selection, thus changing the calculus; now any tumour suppressor gene can be mutated to determine its functional role at different stages of the neoplastic process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Primary organoid cultures contain much of the diversity present in the donor.

    “Primary organoid cultures contain much of the diversity present in the donor.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ARID1A acts to regulate ATPases BRM and BRG1 of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complexes, which are present in mutually exclusive complexes.

    “ARID1A acts to regulate ATPases (BRM and BRG1) of the large ATP-dependent SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complexes involved in transcriptional regulation of gene expression and that are present in mutually exclusive complexes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The guide RNA that yields the highest knockout efficiency in cells will also yield the highest knockout efficiency in organoids.

    “Their KO efficiency was first assessed in cells. The guide yielding the highest KO per gene was taken forward for use in organoids.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure caption assigns PTENP1 coordinates to different chromosomes

    Minor

    The Results locate PTENP1 on chromosome 9, whereas the Fig. 2 caption labels coordinates on chromosomes 8 and 19 as coordinates for PTENP1.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skoufou-Papoutsaki, N., Adler, S., D'Santos, P., Mannion, L., Mehmed, S., Kemp, R., Smith, A., Perrone, F., Nayak, K., Russell, A., Zilbauer, M., & Winton, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • CRUK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK 1
Venue
Disease Models & Mechanisms
Published
2023-10-01
Volume
16
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-8411
OpenAlex
W4387157817
Cited by
22
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (103805, 102160/Z/13/Z)
  • Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge (A24456)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
intestinal organoids, genome editing efficiency, electroporation, PTEN, tumour suppressor, cell proliferation, mTORC1 signaling, gene expression profiling
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Humans, Organoids, Ribonucleoproteins, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review