Cited by 1,139Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture

Open access
Mumbach, Maxwell R, Rubin, Adam J, Flynn, Ryan A, Dai, Chao, Khavari, Paul A, Greenleaf, William J, Chang, Howard Y·2016·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Genome conformation is central to gene control but challenging to interrogate. Here we present HiChIP, a protein-centric chromatin conformation method. HiChIP improves the yield of conformation-informative reads by over 10-fold and lowers the input requirement over 100-fold relative to that of ChIA-PET. HiChIP of cohesin reveals multiscale genome architecture with greater signal-to-background ratios than those of in situ Hi-C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.3999

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enhancer function requires physical contacts between enhancers and promoters in three dimensions.

    “The activity of enhancers depends on three-dimensional enhancer-promoter interactions (8)”

    From Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Main Text reports that certain Oct4–Smc1a chromatin loops are associated with active enhancers and promoters. It does not establish that enhancer activity depends on, or requires, those physical interactions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In each cell type, a single promoter can connect to multiple enhancers.

    “We identified putative active promoters and enhancers in each cell type and found a one-to many relationship between promoters and enhancers (8).”

    From Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Main Text (page not provided) associates some HiChIP loops with active enhancers and promoters, but does not report how many enhancers connect to a promoter in each cell type. Searches for a one-to-many promoter–enhancer relationship and for multiple enhancers per promoter found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Acute depletion of CTCF in mouse embryonic stem cells causes loss of chromatin loops between CTCF-bound sites genome-wide.

    “CTCF is absolutely and dose-dependently required for looping between CTCF target sites and insulation of topologically associating domains (TADs).”
  • At stringent boundary thresholds, 62% of called boundaries matched previously identified loop anchors within ±1 20-kb bin.

    “This comparison revealed that at high threshold values, corresponding to stricter boundary selection, up to 62% of detected boundaries co-aligned with the previously detected loop anchors within +-1 20kb bin precision.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mumbach, M. R., Rubin, A. J., Flynn, R. A., Dai, C., Khavari, P. A., Greenleaf, W. J., & Chang, H. Y.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Howard Y
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2016-09-19
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
919-922
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2523285811
Cited by
1,139
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
37.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od018220-01, NIH P50, HG007735)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG007735, P50HG007735, T32HG000044)
  • National Cancer Institute (F30CA189514, P30CA124435)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
HiChIP, 3D genome organization, chromosome conformation capture, tagmentation, cohesin, signal-to-background ratio
MeSH terms
Cohesins, Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Cell Line, Cell Nucleus, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Chromosome Mapping, DNA, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cell Cycle Proteins, Genomics, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review