Cited by 280Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchStress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome

Papadopoulos, Andrew S., Cleare, Anthony J.·2012·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Abstract

The weight of current evidence supports the presence of the following factors related to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): mild hypocortisolism; attenuated diurnal variation of cortisol; enhanced negative feedback to the HPA axis; and blunted HPA axis responsiveness. Furthermore, HPA axis changes seem clinically relevant, as they are associated with worse symptoms and/or disability and with poorer outcomes to standard treatments for CFS. Regarding etiology, women with CFS are more likely to have reduced cortisol levels. Studies published in the past 8 years provide further support for a multifactorial model in which several factors interact to moderate HPA axis changes. In particular, low activity levels, depression and early-life stress appear to reduce cortisol levels, whereas the use of psychotropic medication can increase cortisol. Addressing these factors-for example, with cognitive behavioral therapy-can increase cortisol levels and is probably the first-line approach for correcting HPA axis dysfunction at present, as steroid replacement is not recommended. Given what is now a fairly consistent pattern of findings for the type of HPA axis changes found in CFS, we recommend that future work focuses on improving our understanding of the cause and relevance of these observed changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2011.153

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, A. S., & Cleare, A. J.
Corresponding author
Cleare, Anthony J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2011-09-27
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
22-32
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W2010485769
Cited by
280
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, cortisol, adrenal insufficiency, diurnal cortisol rhythm, depression, early life stress, psychotropic drugs, cognitive behavioral therapy, steroid replacement therapy, disability
MeSH terms
Dehydroepiandrosterone, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamic Diseases, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Models, Biological, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review