Cited by 543Adipose Tissue and MetabolismAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Biology of upper-body and lower-body adipose tissue—link to whole-body phenotypes.

Karpe, Fredrik, Pinnick, Katherine E.·2015·Nature Reviews Endocrinology

Abstract

The distribution of adipose tissue in the body has wide-ranging and reproducible associations with health and disease. Accumulation of adipose tissue in the upper body (abdominal obesity) is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus and even all-cause mortality. Conversely, accumulation of fat in the lower body (gluteofemoral obesity) shows opposite associations with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus when adjusted for overall fat mass. The abdominal depots are characterized by rapid uptake of predominantly diet-derived fat and a high lipid turnover that is easily stimulated by adrenergic receptor activation. The lower-body fat stores have a reduced lipid turnover with a capacity to accommodate fat undergoing redistribution. Lower-body adipose tissue also seems to retain the capacity to recruit additional adipocytes as a result of weight gain and demonstrates fewer signs of inflammatory insult. New data suggest that the profound functional differences between the upper-body and lower-body tissues are controlled by site-specific sets of developmental genes, such as HOXA6, HOXA5, HOXA3, IRX2 and TBX5 in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue and HOTAIR, SHOX2 and HOXC11 in gluteofemoral adipose tissue, which are under epigenetic control. This Review discusses the developmental and functional differences between upper-body and lower-body fat depots and provides mechanistic insight into the disease-prot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrendo.2014.185

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karpe, F., & Pinnick, K. E.
Affiliations
Churchill Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Karpe, Fredrik
  • Pinnick, Katherine E.
Venue
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Published
2014-11-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
90-100
ISSN
  • 1759-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5037
OpenAlex
W1980719167
Cited by
543
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/12/78/29862)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Keywords
body fat distribution, abdominal obesity, upper body fat, adipose tissue development, adipose tissue inflammation, epigenetic regulation, cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, all-cause mortality
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review