Cited by 604Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The RNA World: molecular cooperation at the origins of life

Higgs, Paul G., Lehman, Niles·2015·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

The RNA World concept posits that there was a period of time in primitive Earth's history - about 4 billion years ago - when the primary living substance was RNA or something chemically similar. In the past 50 years, this idea has gone from speculation to a prevailing idea. In this Review, we summarize the key logic behind the RNA World and describe some of the most important recent advances that have been made to support and expand this logic. We also discuss the ways in which molecular cooperation involving RNAs would facilitate the emergence and early evolution of life. The immediate future of RNA World research should be a very dynamic one.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3841

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The key argument against the RNA World hypothesis has been the non-demonstration of a self-copying RNA replicase.

    “The key argument against the RNA World hypothesis has so far been the non-demonstration of the existence of a self-copying RNA replicase”

    From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Higgs and Lehman 2015

  • The alternative option, self-replicating RNA, does not fare better than catalytic networks regarding empirical evidence for spontaneous self-assembly in a prebiotic environment.

    “Second, because the alternative option, self-replicating RNA, does not fare better than catalytic networks regarding empirical evidence for spontaneous self-assembly in a prebiotic environment [6].”
  • Cooperative systems are generally more stable towards parasites than autocatalytic self-replicators and are, in principle, able to gain in complexity.

    “Moreover, cooperative systems are generally more stable towards parasites then autocatalytic self-replicators and are, in principle, able to gain in complexity [46–47].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgs, P. G., & Lehman, N.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lehman, Niles
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2014-11-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
7-17
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W1970977492
Cited by
604
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
RNA world, origin of life, RNA self-replication, RNA synthesis, early evolution of life, prebiotic chemistry, early Earth
MeSH terms
Origin of Life, Models, Biological, RNA, RNA, Catalytic, Evolution, Molecular, Base Pairing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review