Cited by 68Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Posterior and anterior cortex—where is the difference that makes the difference?

Open access
Koch, Christof, Massimini, Marcello, Boly, Melanie, Tononi, Giulio·2016·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn.2016.105

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A substrate of maximum phi is hypothesized to reside primarily in the posterior cerebral cortex, including parietal, occipital and lateral temporal lobes, referred to as the posterior hot zone.

    “Based on theoretical and neuroanatomical considerations, a substrate of maximum ϕ is hypothesized to reside primarily [although possibly not exclusively; 30] in the posterior cerebral cortex, characterized by ‘pyramid-of-grids’-like connectivity. These regions, including the parietal, occipital and lateral temporal lobes, are referred to as the posterior “hot zone” [30].”

    From An adversarial collaboration protocol for testing contrasting predictions of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory (2023) · cites this paper as [30]

    In the main text (page unavailable), the paper calls the posterior ‘hot zone’ the likely substrate of many aspects of phenomenal experience and describes a physical substrate of consciousness as a maximum of intrinsic cause–effect power. It does not explicitly locate that maximum in the posterior cortex or specify parietal, occipital and lateral temporal lobes or ‘pyramid-of-grids’ connectivity. It also cautions that the hot zone is not necessarily the full neural correlate of consciousness. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Tononi, Giulio
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
666-666
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2485538883
Cited by
68
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neural correlates of consciousness, integrated information theory, posterior cortex, anterior cortex, consciousness, brain regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review