Cited by 155Visual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceFace Recognition and Perception

Imaging implicit perception: promise and pitfalls

Hannula, Deborah E., Simons, Daniel J., Cohen, Neal J.·2005·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The study of implicit perception - perception in the absence of awareness - has a long history. Decades of behavioural work have identified crucial theoretical and methodological issues that must be considered when evaluating claims of implicit perception. Neuroimaging methods provide an important new avenue for illuminating our understanding of perception both with and without awareness, but most imaging experiments have not met the rigorous conditions that the behavioural work has shown are necessary for inferring implicit perception. Here, we review the literature of both behavioural and neuroimaging studies, and note the pitfalls of studying implicit perception as well as the promise that neuroimaging studies have for providing insights about implicit perception when combined with appropriately rigorous behavioural measures of awareness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1630

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies supporting the existence of unconscious priming rely on a dissociation procedure, i.e., showing that prime awareness is not significantly different from chance while also showing a significant priming effect.

    “Most studies supporting the existence of unconscious priming rely on what is usually referred to as a dissociation procedure (Reingold and Merikle 1988, Hannula et al. 2005, Schmidt and Vorberg 2006), i.e. showing that prime awareness is not significantly different from chance, while also showing a significant priming effect.”

    From Evidence for unconscious priming using a Bayesian single-subject approach (2026) · cites this paper as Hannula et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hannula, D. E., Simons, D. J., & Cohen, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Hannula, Deborah E.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2005-03
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
247-255
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2095270828
Cited by
155
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
implicit perception, awareness, methodological quality, unconscious perception, visual awareness
MeSH terms
Animals, Awareness, Brain Mapping, Consciousness, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Functional Laterality, Neuropsychological Tests, Perception, Perceptual Masking, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review