Cited by 1,117Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsFace recognition and analysis

Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions

Open access
Vuilleumier, Patrik, Armony, Jorge L, Driver, Jon, Dolan, Raymond J·2003·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

High and low spatial frequency information in visual images is processed by distinct neural channels. Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans, we show dissociable roles of such visual channels for processing faces and emotional fearful expressions. Neural responses in fusiform cortex, and effects of repeating the same face identity upon fusiform activity, were greater with intact or high-spatial-frequency face stimuli than with low-frequency faces, regardless of emotional expression. In contrast, amygdala responses to fearful expressions were greater for intact or low-frequency faces than for high-frequency faces. An activation of pulvinar and superior colliculus by fearful expressions occurred specifically with low-frequency faces, suggesting that these subcortical pathways may provide coarse fear-related inputs to the amygdala.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1057

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Vuilleumier, Patrik
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2003-05-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
624-631
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2144016834
Cited by
1,117
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 67
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
spatial frequency, face processing, emotional facial expressions, fear, fusiform gyrus, amygdala, pulvinar, superior colliculus
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Face, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Sex Characteristics, Visual Pathways, Observer Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review