Cited by 356Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence

Open access
Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L.·2004·Psychological Science

Abstract

Fluent readers recognize visual words across changes in case and retinal location, while maintaining a high sensitivity to the arrangement of letters. To evaluate the automaticity and functional anatomy of invariant word recognition, we measured brain activity during subliminal masked priming. By preceding target words with an unrelated prime, a repeated prime, or an anagram made of the same letters, we separated letter-level and whole-word codes. By changing the case and the retinal location of primes and targets, we evaluated the invariance of those codes. Our results indicate that an invariant binding of letters into words is achieved unconsciously through a series of increasingly invariant stages in the left occipito-temporal pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The VWFA is generally insensitive to factors that influence lexical access, such as contrasts between high- and low-frequency words, or between real and pseudowords.

    “TheVWFAisgenerallyinsensitive to factors that influence lexical access, such as contrasts between high- and lowfrequency words [24], or between real and pseudowords, as revealed by event-related fMRI analyses [11,23,25].”
  • Case invariance holds even for upper and lowercase letters that share no visual similarity but are related only by arbitrary cultural convention.

    “Case invariance holds even for upper and lowercase letters that share no visual similarity but are related only by arbitrary cultural convention (e.g. a and A, g and G) [22,23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Unité de Neuroimagerie Anatomo-Fonctionnelle, Institut Fédératif de Recherches 49, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Orsay, France
Corresponding author
Dehaene, S.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
307-313
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2146819315
Cited by
356
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 26
FWCI
38.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
word recognition, visual word recognition, unconscious processes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Occipital Lobe, Perceptual Masking, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review