Cited by 2,007Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 225 of the 225 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective

Open access
Grupe, Dan W., Nitschke, Jack B.·2013·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Uncertainty about a possible future threat disrupts our ability to avoid it or to mitigate its negative impact and thus results in anxiety. Here, we focus the broad literature on the neurobiology of anxiety through the lens of uncertainty. We identify five processes that are essential for adaptive anticipatory responses to future threat uncertainty and propose that alterations in the neural instantiation of these processes result in maladaptive responses to uncertainty in pathological anxiety. This framework has the potential to advance the classification, diagnosis and treatment of clinical anxiety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn3524

Cites

225 of 225 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 223 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edn (American Psychiatric Press, 2000).
  2. Beck, A. T. & Emery, G. Anxiety Dsorders and Phobias: a Cognitive Perspective (Basic Books, 1985).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,007

Metadata

Authors
Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Nitschke, Jack B.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
488-501
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2004873925
Cited by
2,007
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 243 · 2025: 207 · 2024: 199 · 2023: 174 · 2022: 232 · 2021: 255 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 3
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh082130-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K02‑MH082130, R01MH074847, R01-MH74847)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety, uncertainty, anticipation, threat anticipation, neurobiology of anxiety, anticipatory responses, anxiety treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Attention, Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Neurobiology, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review