Cited by 184Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Aβ-independent processes—rethinking preclinical AD

Open access
Chételat, Gaël·2013·Nature Reviews Neurology

Abstract

The amyloid cascade hypothesis, which posits that amyloid-β accumulation is the key event in Alzheimer disease neurodegeneration, has dominated the field for 20 years. Recent findings, however, show that neuronal-injury biomarkers are independent of amyloid-β, calling for reconsideration of the pathological cascade and assessment of alternative therapeutic strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.21

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For many subjects with suspected AD or increased risk, what are currently considered downstream biomarker changes potentially precede upstream biomarker changes.

    “Our hypothesis, therefore, can accommodate a growing realization that for many subjects with suspected AD, or who have an increased risk of developing AD, what are currently considered downstream biomarker changes potentially precede upstream biomarker changes [206-213].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chételat, G.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Chételat, Gaël
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2013-02-12
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
123-124
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W2065174137
Cited by
184
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11
FWCI
16.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, amyloid hypothesis, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloidosis, Brain, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review