Cited by 269Cardiac Health and Mental HealthPersonality Traits and PsychologyCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: pooled analysis of three cohort studies

Jokela, Markus, Pulkki-Råback, Laura, Elovainio, Marko, Kivimäki, Mika·2014·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

We examined whether personality traits are differently associated with coronary heart disease and stroke mortality. Participants were pooled from three prospective cohort studies (Health and Retirement Study, Wisconsin Longitudinal Study graduate and sibling samples; n = 24,543 men and women, mean age 61.4 years, mortality follow-up between 3 and 15 years). There were 423 coronary heart disease deaths and 88 stroke deaths during 212,542 person-years at risk. Higher extraversion was associated with an increased risk of stroke (hazard ratio per each standard deviation increase in personality trait HR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.10-1.80) but not with coronary heart disease mortality (HR = 0.93, 0.83-1.05). High neuroticism, in turn, was more strongly related to the risk of coronary heart disease (HR = 1.16, 1.04-1.29) than stroke deaths (HR = 0.95, 0.78-1.17). High conscientiousness was associated with lower mortality risk from both coronary heart disease (HR = 0.74, 0.67-0.81) and stroke (HR = 0.78, 0.63-0.97). Cardiovascular risk associated with personality traits appears to vary between main cardiac and cerebral disease endpoints.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-013-9548-z

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jokela, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., Elovainio, M., & Kivimäki, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Corresponding author
Jokela, Markus
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2013-11-08
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
881-889
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2023153771
Cited by
269
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/13/2/30098)
  • Juho Vainion Säätiö
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K013351/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J023299/1)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034454)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL036310)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
personality traits, stroke mortality, coronary heart disease mortality, extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, Big Five personality traits, cardiovascular risk, older adults
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Coronary Disease, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review