The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Self‐directed Stigma: Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The present study developed the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS), an 11‐item measure assessing internalized weight bias among the overweight and obese. Methods and Procedures: An Internet sample was recruited through online community discussion groups and snowball sampling via e‐mail. Women (n = 164) and men (n = 34) with a BMI >25 kg/m 2 completed the WBIS and the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire (AAQ), as well as measures of self‐esteem, body image, mood disturbance, drive for thinness, and binge eating. Results: Results indicate that the WBIS had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.90) and correlated significantly with antifat attitudes but was not a completely overlapping construct (r = 0.31). The scale showed strong partial correlations with self‐esteem (r = −0.67), drive for thinness (r = 0.47), and body image concern (r = 0.75), controlling for BMI. Internalized weight bias was also significantly correlated with measures of mood and eating disturbance. Multiple regression analyses were conducted using WBIS scores, antifat attitudes, and BMI as predictor variables of body image, mood, self‐esteem, and binge eating. WBIS scores were found to significantly predict scores on each of these measures. Discussion: The WBIS showed excellent psychometric properties and construct validity. The study highlights the importance of distinguishing antifat attitudes toward others from internalized weight bias, a construct that may be closely linked with psychopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 · Cited by 4,874
Minority Stress and Mental Health in Gay Men
Meyer, I. H. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137286 · Cited by 4,264 · cited 1×
“These items were modeled after questions from previously established measures of antifat attitudes (11) and internalized homonegativity (18–21), or the degree to which a gay person directs negative societal attitudes about homosexuality toward the self (22).”
BackgroundFactor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932 · cited 1×
“The ability of the Internet to provide adequately random samples has been justified in previous research (17).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1177/002214650504600303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/oby.2005.105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/oby.2001.108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.60 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800765 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/oby.2007.521 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/1098-108X(199401)15:1<53::AID-EAT2260150107>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.beem.2005.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.882 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00555.x · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-108X(199109)10:5<599::AID-EAT2260100512>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
- Crandall CS, 2005, Attributions and Weight‐Based Prejudice
- 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802730 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.557 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2466/pms.1994.78.3c.1168 · DOI
- Herek GM, 1997, Correlates of internalized homophobia in a community sample of lesbians and gay men, J Gay Les Med Assoc, 2, 17
- 10.1080/07481756.2000.12068999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199601)52:1<15::AID-JCLP2>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- 10.1300/J082v41n02_03 · DOI
- Rosenberg M., 1979, Conceiving the Self
- 10.1016/S0165-1781(01)00254-2 · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-108X(198707)6:4<485::AID-EAT2260060405>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/1098-108X(198321)2:2<15::AID-EAT2260020203>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199611)20:3<315::AID-EAT11>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1077727X06289430 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000441-200306000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Weight bias internalization and health: a systematic review
Pearl, R. L., & Puhl, R. M. (2018) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12701 · Cited by 642
Wu, Y., & Berry, D. C. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13511 · Cited by 536
Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity.
Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Pearl, R. L. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000538 · Cited by 452
Internalized Societal Attitudes Moderate the Impact of Weight Stigma on Avoidance of Exercise
Vartanian, L. R., & Novak, S. A. (2011) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2010.234 · Cited by 381
Correlates of weight stigma in adults with overweight and obesity: A systematic literature review
Papadopoulos, S., & Brennan, L. (2015) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.21187 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Durso, L. E., & Latner, J. D.
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- S2
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W2086509357
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Self‐directed Stigma: Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2008.448
- The paper
- Durso, L. E., & Latner, J. D. (2008). Understanding Self‐directed Stigma: Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.