Cited by 313Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Racism and Cardiovascular Disease in African Americans

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the evidence on the ways racism can affect the disproportionate rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in African Americans. It describes the significant health disparities in CVD for blacks and whites and suggests that racial disparities should be understood within the context of persistent inequities in societal institutions and relations. Evidence and potential pathways for exploring effects of 3 levels of racism on cardiovascular health risk factors and outcomes are reviewed. First, institutional racism can lead to limited opportunities for socioeconomic mobility, differential access to goods and resources, and poor living conditions that can adversely affect cardiovascular health. Second, perceived/personally mediated racism acts as a stressor and can induce psychophysiological reactions that negatively affect cardiovascular health. Third, in race-conscious societies, such as the United States, the negative self-evaluations of accepting negative cultural stereotypes as true (internalized racism) can have deleterious effects on cardiovascular health. Few population-based studies have examined the relationship between racism and CVD. The findings, though suggestive of a positive association, are neither consistent nor clear. The research agenda of the Jackson Heart Study in addressing the role of racism in CVD is presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000441-200306000-00003

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvin, R., Winters, K., Wyatt, S. B., Williams, D. R., Henderson, F. C., & Walker, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Alcorn State University (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wyatt, Sharon B.
Venue
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
325
Issue
6
Pages
315-331
ISSN
0002-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994293871
Cited by
313
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 27
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of the Medical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC9571)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
racism, cardiovascular disease, African Americans, racial disparities in health, institutional racism, perceived racism, internalized racism, socioeconomic inequities, psychophysiological stress, cardiovascular risk factors, Jackson Heart Study, structural racism
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Prejudice, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review