Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition in the amygdala anxiety circuitry

Open access
Babaev, Olga, Piletti Chatain, Carolina, Krueger-Burg, Dilja·2018·Experimental & Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Inhibitory neurotransmission plays a key role in anxiety disorders, as evidenced by the anxiolytic effect of the benzodiazepine class of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists and the recent discovery of anxiety-associated variants in the molecular components of inhibitory synapses. Accordingly, substantial interest has focused on understanding how inhibitory neurons and synapses contribute to the circuitry underlying adaptive and pathological anxiety behaviors. A key element of the anxiety circuitry is the amygdala, which integrates information from cortical and thalamic sensory inputs to generate fear and anxiety-related behavioral outputs. Information processing within the amygdala is heavily dependent on inhibitory control, although the specific mechanisms by which amygdala GABAergic neurons and synapses regulate anxiety-related behaviors are only beginning to be uncovered. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge and highlight open questions regarding the role of inhibition in the amygdala anxiety circuitry. We discuss the inhibitory neuron subtypes that contribute to the processing of anxiety information in the basolateral and central amygdala, as well as the molecular determinants, such as GABA receptors and synapse organizer proteins, that shape inhibitory synaptic transmission within the anxiety circuitry. Finally, we conclude with an overview of current and future approaches for converting this knowledge into successful treatment strategies for anxiety disorders. Understanding inhibitory neurotransmission in the amygdala is key to developing more effective therapeutics against anxiety. Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent group of psychiatric diseases, yet they are often under-treated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of current treatment approaches. Dilja Krueger-Burg and colleagues at the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine in Göttingen, Germany, review current knowledge of the inhibitory neuronal circuits and molecular mechanisms that contribute to anxiety behaviors in the amygdala, a key brain region for processing emotions. It is well established that alterations in inhibitory neurotransmission and excessive excitatory neurotransmission underlie anxiety disorders. Using the latest technologies to identify the neuronal populations and synaptic components implicated in the regulation of anxiety-related behaviors should help to develop new targeted treatments with fewer side-effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s12276-018-0063-8

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 129 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Babaev, O., Piletti Chatain, C., & Krueger-Burg, D.
Venue
Experimental & Molecular Medicine
Published
2018-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1226-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 2092-6413
OpenAlex
W2797632989
Cited by
308
References
129
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition in the amygdala anxiety circuitry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s12276-018-0063-8
The paper
Babaev, O., Piletti Chatain, C., & Krueger-Burg, D. (2018). Inhibition in the amygdala anxiety circuitry. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-018-0063-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.